@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static const struct pci_id_table pci_dev_table[] = {
PCI_ID_TABLE_ENTRY(pci_dev_descr_i7core_nehalem),
PCI_ID_TABLE_ENTRY(pci_dev_descr_lynnfield),
PCI_ID_TABLE_ENTRY(pci_dev_descr_i7core_westmere),
- {0,} /* 0 terminated list. */
+ {NULL,} /* NULL terminated list. */
};
/*
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static const struct pci_id_descr pci_dev_descr_sbridge[] = {
static const struct pci_id_table pci_dev_descr_sbridge_table[] = {
PCI_ID_TABLE_ENTRY(pci_dev_descr_sbridge, ARRAY_SIZE(pci_dev_descr_sbridge), 1, SANDY_BRIDGE),
- {0,} /* 0 terminated list. */
+ {NULL,} /* NULL terminated list. */
};
/* This changes depending if 1HA or 2HA:
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static const struct pci_id_descr pci_dev_descr_ibridge[] = {
static const struct pci_id_table pci_dev_descr_ibridge_table[] = {
PCI_ID_TABLE_ENTRY(pci_dev_descr_ibridge, 12, 2, IVY_BRIDGE),
- {0,} /* 0 terminated list. */
+ {NULL,} /* NULL terminated list. */
};
/* Haswell support */
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static const struct pci_id_descr pci_dev_descr_haswell[] = {
static const struct pci_id_table pci_dev_descr_haswell_table[] = {
PCI_ID_TABLE_ENTRY(pci_dev_descr_haswell, 13, 2, HASWELL),
- {0,} /* 0 terminated list. */
+ {NULL,} /* NULL terminated list. */
};
/* Knight's Landing Support */
@@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static const struct pci_id_descr pci_dev_descr_knl[] = {
static const struct pci_id_table pci_dev_descr_knl_table[] = {
PCI_ID_TABLE_ENTRY(pci_dev_descr_knl, ARRAY_SIZE(pci_dev_descr_knl), 1, KNIGHTS_LANDING),
- {0,}
+ {NULL,}
};
/*
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static const struct pci_id_descr pci_dev_descr_broadwell[] = {
static const struct pci_id_table pci_dev_descr_broadwell_table[] = {
PCI_ID_TABLE_ENTRY(pci_dev_descr_broadwell, 10, 2, BROADWELL),
- {0,} /* 0 terminated list. */
+ {NULL,} /* NULL terminated list. */
};
Sparse static analysis tools generate a warning with this message "Using plain integer as NULL pointer". In this case this warning is being shown because we are trying to initialize pointer to NULL using integer value 0. The reason for this change is that use of numeric 0 for a null pointer is unacceptable. See this link for the long description why: Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sparse/msg10066.html Signed-off-by: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com> --- v1 -> v2: 1. Fixed the comment section descrbing the current code. 2. Added a reason for why this change is required. v2 -> v3: 1. Reversed change made in comments by mistake. drivers/edac/i7core_edac.c | 2 +- drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 10 +++++----- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)