diff mbox series

[net-next,v9,1/7] net: introduce rstreason to detect why the RST is sent

Message ID 20240425031340.46946-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Implement reset reason mechanism to detect | expand

Commit Message

Jason Xing April 25, 2024, 3:13 a.m. UTC
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>

Add a new standalone file for the easy future extension to support
both active reset and passive reset in the TCP/DCCP/MPTCP protocols.

This patch only does the preparations for reset reason mechanism,
nothing else changes.

The reset reasons are divided into three parts:
1) reuse drop reasons for passive reset in TCP
2) our own independent reasons which aren't relying on other reasons at all
3) reuse MP_TCPRST option for MPTCP

The benefits of a standalone reset reason are listed here:
1) it can cover more than one case, such as reset reasons in MPTCP,
active reset reasons.
2) people can easily/fastly understand and maintain this mechanism.
3) we get unified format of output with prefix stripped.
4) more new reset reasons are on the way
...

I will implement the basic codes of active/passive reset reason in
those three protocols, which are not complete for this moment. For
passive reset part in TCP, I only introduce the NO_SOCKET common case
which could be set as an example.

After this series applied, it will have the ability to open a new
gate to let other people contribute more reasons into it :)

Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
---
 include/net/rstreason.h | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 include/net/rstreason.h

Comments

Eric Dumazet April 26, 2024, 7:09 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 5:13 AM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
>
> Add a new standalone file for the easy future extension to support
> both active reset and passive reset in the TCP/DCCP/MPTCP protocols.
>
> This patch only does the preparations for reset reason mechanism,
> nothing else changes.
>
> The reset reasons are divided into three parts:
> 1) reuse drop reasons for passive reset in TCP
> 2) our own independent reasons which aren't relying on other reasons at all
> 3) reuse MP_TCPRST option for MPTCP
>
> The benefits of a standalone reset reason are listed here:
> 1) it can cover more than one case, such as reset reasons in MPTCP,
> active reset reasons.
> 2) people can easily/fastly understand and maintain this mechanism.
> 3) we get unified format of output with prefix stripped.
> 4) more new reset reasons are on the way
> ...
>
> I will implement the basic codes of active/passive reset reason in
> those three protocols, which are not complete for this moment. For
> passive reset part in TCP, I only introduce the NO_SOCKET common case
> which could be set as an example.
>
> After this series applied, it will have the ability to open a new
> gate to let other people contribute more reasons into it :)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
> Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/net/rstreason.h b/include/net/rstreason.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..bc53b5a24505
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/net/rstreason.h
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ 
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
+
+#ifndef _LINUX_RSTREASON_H
+#define _LINUX_RSTREASON_H
+#include <net/dropreason-core.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/mptcp.h>
+
+#define DEFINE_RST_REASON(FN, FNe)	\
+	FN(NOT_SPECIFIED)		\
+	FN(NO_SOCKET)			\
+	FN(MPTCP_RST_EUNSPEC)		\
+	FN(MPTCP_RST_EMPTCP)		\
+	FN(MPTCP_RST_ERESOURCE)		\
+	FN(MPTCP_RST_EPROHIBIT)		\
+	FN(MPTCP_RST_EWQ2BIG)		\
+	FN(MPTCP_RST_EBADPERF)		\
+	FN(MPTCP_RST_EMIDDLEBOX)	\
+	FN(ERROR)			\
+	FNe(MAX)
+
+/**
+ * enum sk_rst_reason - the reasons of socket reset
+ *
+ * The reasons of sk reset, which are used in DCCP/TCP/MPTCP protocols.
+ *
+ * There are three parts in order:
+ * 1) skb drop reasons: relying on drop reasons for such as passive reset
+ * 2) independent reset reasons: such as active reset reasons
+ * 3) reset reasons in MPTCP: only for MPTCP use
+ */
+enum sk_rst_reason {
+	/* Refer to include/net/dropreason-core.h
+	 * Rely on skb drop reasons because it indicates exactly why RST
+	 * could happen.
+	 */
+	/** @SK_RST_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED: reset reason is not specified */
+	SK_RST_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED,
+	/** @SK_RST_REASON_NO_SOCKET: no valid socket that can be used */
+	SK_RST_REASON_NO_SOCKET,
+
+	/* Copy from include/uapi/linux/mptcp.h.
+	 * These reset fields will not be changed since they adhere to
+	 * RFC 8684. So do not touch them. I'm going to list each definition
+	 * of them respectively.
+	 */
+	/**
+	 * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EUNSPEC: Unspecified error.
+	 * This is the default error; it implies that the subflow is no
+	 * longer available. The presence of this option shows that the
+	 * RST was generated by an MPTCP-aware device.
+	 */
+	SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EUNSPEC,
+	/**
+	 * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EMPTCP: MPTCP-specific error.
+	 * An error has been detected in the processing of MPTCP options.
+	 * This is the usual reason code to return in the cases where a RST
+	 * is being sent to close a subflow because of an invalid response.
+	 */
+	SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EMPTCP,
+	/**
+	 * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_ERESOURCE: Lack of resources.
+	 * This code indicates that the sending host does not have enough
+	 * resources to support the terminated subflow.
+	 */
+	SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_ERESOURCE,
+	/**
+	 * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EPROHIBIT: Administratively prohibited.
+	 * This code indicates that the requested subflow is prohibited by
+	 * the policies of the sending host.
+	 */
+	SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EPROHIBIT,
+	/**
+	 * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EWQ2BIG: Too much outstanding data.
+	 * This code indicates that there is an excessive amount of data
+	 * that needs to be transmitted over the terminated subflow while
+	 * having already been acknowledged over one or more other subflows.
+	 * This may occur if a path has been unavailable for a short period
+	 * and it is more efficient to reset and start again than it is to
+	 * retransmit the queued data.
+	 */
+	SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EWQ2BIG,
+	/**
+	 * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EBADPERF: Unacceptable performance.
+	 * This code indicates that the performance of this subflow was
+	 * too low compared to the other subflows of this Multipath TCP
+	 * connection.
+	 */
+	SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EBADPERF,
+	/**
+	 * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EMIDDLEBOX: Middlebox interference.
+	 * Middlebox interference has been detected over this subflow,
+	 * making MPTCP signaling invalid. For example, this may be sent
+	 * if the checksum does not validate.
+	 */
+	SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EMIDDLEBOX,
+
+	/** @SK_RST_REASON_ERROR: unexpected error happens */
+	SK_RST_REASON_ERROR,
+
+	/**
+	 * @SK_RST_REASON_MAX: Maximum of socket reset reasons.
+	 * It shouldn't be used as a real 'reason'.
+	 */
+	SK_RST_REASON_MAX,
+};
+#endif