Message ID | 20240430091740.1826862-14-vschneid@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | context_tracking, rcu: Spring cleaning renaming | expand |
Le Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:17:17AM +0200, Valentin Schneider a écrit : > The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to > RCU_WATCHING, and the 'dynticks' prefix can be dropped without losing any > meaning. > > Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Le Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:17:17AM +0200, Valentin Schneider a écrit : > The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to > RCU_WATCHING, and the 'dynticks' prefix can be dropped without losing any > meaning. > > Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> > --- > kernel/context_tracking.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/context_tracking.c b/kernel/context_tracking.c > index 647939b0befd9..9c8f7b9191cd4 100644 > --- a/kernel/context_tracking.c > +++ b/kernel/context_tracking.c > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(context_tracking); > #define TPS(x) tracepoint_string(x) > > /* Record the current task on dyntick-idle entry. */ > -static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(void) > +static __always_inline void rcu_task_enter(void) On a second thought, this should be the reverse. We are not telling anymore that we are entering dynticks mode from an RCU-task perspective. We are telling that we are exiting RCU-tasks because we are in eqs mode (even though this is mostly a concern for nohz_full here, as idle tasks are entirely quiescent states but anyway...). So this should be s/rcu_dynticks_task_enter/rcu_task_exit > { > #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) > WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu, smp_processor_id()); > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(void) > } > > /* Record no current task on dyntick-idle exit. */ > -static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(void) > +static __always_inline void rcu_task_exit(void) And s/rcu_dynticks_task_exit/rcu_task_enter > { > #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) > WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu, -1); > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(void) > } > > /* Turn on heavyweight RCU tasks trace readers on idle/user entry. */ > -static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_trace_enter(void) > +static __always_inline void rcu_task_trace_enter(void) The same reverse naming goes for task_trace (even though I can't make sense right now of what the barrier it implies orders exactly, but that's another story) > { > #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB)) > @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_trace_enter(void) > } > > /* Turn off heavyweight RCU tasks trace readers on idle/user exit. */ > -static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_trace_exit(void) > +static __always_inline void rcu_task_trace_exit(void) > { > #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB)) > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static noinstr void ct_kernel_exit_state(int offset) > * critical sections, and we also must force ordering with the > * next idle sojourn. > */ > - rcu_dynticks_task_trace_enter(); // Before ->dynticks update! > + rcu_task_trace_enter(); // Before ->dynticks update! s/->dynticks/->state > seq = ct_state_inc(offset); > // RCU is no longer watching. Better be in extended quiescent state! > WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG) && (seq & CT_RCU_WATCHING)); > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static noinstr void ct_kernel_enter_state(int offset) > */ > seq = ct_state_inc(offset); > // RCU is now watching. Better not be in an extended quiescent state! > - rcu_dynticks_task_trace_exit(); // After ->dynticks update! > + rcu_task_trace_exit(); // After ->dynticks update! ditto Thanks!
On 08/05/24 16:39, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Le Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:17:17AM +0200, Valentin Schneider a écrit : >> The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to >> RCU_WATCHING, and the 'dynticks' prefix can be dropped without losing any >> meaning. >> >> Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> >> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> >> --- >> kernel/context_tracking.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/kernel/context_tracking.c b/kernel/context_tracking.c >> index 647939b0befd9..9c8f7b9191cd4 100644 >> --- a/kernel/context_tracking.c >> +++ b/kernel/context_tracking.c >> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(context_tracking); >> #define TPS(x) tracepoint_string(x) >> >> /* Record the current task on dyntick-idle entry. */ >> -static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(void) >> +static __always_inline void rcu_task_enter(void) > > On a second thought, this should be the reverse. We are not > telling anymore that we are entering dynticks mode from an > RCU-task perspective. We are telling that we are exiting RCU-tasks > because we are in eqs mode (even though this is mostly a concern > for nohz_full here, as idle tasks are entirely quiescent states > but anyway...). > > So this should be s/rcu_dynticks_task_enter/rcu_task_exit > That definitely makes more sense, thanks! >> { >> #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) >> WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu, smp_processor_id()); >> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(void) >> } >> >> /* Record no current task on dyntick-idle exit. */ >> -static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(void) >> +static __always_inline void rcu_task_exit(void) > > And s/rcu_dynticks_task_exit/rcu_task_enter > >> { >> #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) >> WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu, -1); >> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(void) >> } >> >> /* Turn on heavyweight RCU tasks trace readers on idle/user entry. */ >> -static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_trace_enter(void) >> +static __always_inline void rcu_task_trace_enter(void) > > The same reverse naming goes for task_trace (even though I can't make > sense right now of what the barrier it implies orders exactly, but that's > another story) Ack. > >> { >> #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU >> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB)) >> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_trace_enter(void) >> } >> >> /* Turn off heavyweight RCU tasks trace readers on idle/user exit. */ >> -static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_trace_exit(void) >> +static __always_inline void rcu_task_trace_exit(void) >> { >> #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU >> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB)) >> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static noinstr void ct_kernel_exit_state(int offset) >> * critical sections, and we also must force ordering with the >> * next idle sojourn. >> */ >> - rcu_dynticks_task_trace_enter(); // Before ->dynticks update! >> + rcu_task_trace_enter(); // Before ->dynticks update! > > s/->dynticks/->state > >> seq = ct_state_inc(offset); >> // RCU is no longer watching. Better be in extended quiescent state! >> WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG) && (seq & CT_RCU_WATCHING)); >> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static noinstr void ct_kernel_enter_state(int offset) >> */ >> seq = ct_state_inc(offset); >> // RCU is now watching. Better not be in an extended quiescent state! >> - rcu_dynticks_task_trace_exit(); // After ->dynticks update! >> + rcu_task_trace_exit(); // After ->dynticks update! > > ditto I've got these fixed in 25/27, but I can fold it down into the patches that touch the related areas. > > Thanks!
diff --git a/kernel/context_tracking.c b/kernel/context_tracking.c index 647939b0befd9..9c8f7b9191cd4 100644 --- a/kernel/context_tracking.c +++ b/kernel/context_tracking.c @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(context_tracking); #define TPS(x) tracepoint_string(x) /* Record the current task on dyntick-idle entry. */ -static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(void) +static __always_inline void rcu_task_enter(void) { #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu, smp_processor_id()); @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(void) } /* Record no current task on dyntick-idle exit. */ -static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(void) +static __always_inline void rcu_task_exit(void) { #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu, -1); @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(void) } /* Turn on heavyweight RCU tasks trace readers on idle/user entry. */ -static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_trace_enter(void) +static __always_inline void rcu_task_trace_enter(void) { #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB)) @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_trace_enter(void) } /* Turn off heavyweight RCU tasks trace readers on idle/user exit. */ -static __always_inline void rcu_dynticks_task_trace_exit(void) +static __always_inline void rcu_task_trace_exit(void) { #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB)) @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static noinstr void ct_kernel_exit_state(int offset) * critical sections, and we also must force ordering with the * next idle sojourn. */ - rcu_dynticks_task_trace_enter(); // Before ->dynticks update! + rcu_task_trace_enter(); // Before ->dynticks update! seq = ct_state_inc(offset); // RCU is no longer watching. Better be in extended quiescent state! WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG) && (seq & CT_RCU_WATCHING)); @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static noinstr void ct_kernel_enter_state(int offset) */ seq = ct_state_inc(offset); // RCU is now watching. Better not be in an extended quiescent state! - rcu_dynticks_task_trace_exit(); // After ->dynticks update! + rcu_task_trace_exit(); // After ->dynticks update! WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG) && !(seq & CT_RCU_WATCHING)); } @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static void noinstr ct_kernel_exit(bool user, int offset) // RCU is watching here ... ct_kernel_exit_state(offset); // ... but is no longer watching here. - rcu_dynticks_task_enter(); + rcu_task_enter(); } /* @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static void noinstr ct_kernel_enter(bool user, int offset) ct->nesting++; return; } - rcu_dynticks_task_exit(); + rcu_task_exit(); // RCU is not watching here ... ct_kernel_enter_state(offset); // ... but is watching here. @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ void noinstr ct_nmi_exit(void) // ... but is no longer watching here. if (!in_nmi()) - rcu_dynticks_task_enter(); + rcu_task_enter(); } /** @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void noinstr ct_nmi_enter(void) if (rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs()) { if (!in_nmi()) - rcu_dynticks_task_exit(); + rcu_task_exit(); // RCU is not watching here ... ct_kernel_enter_state(CT_RCU_WATCHING);
The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to RCU_WATCHING, and the 'dynticks' prefix can be dropped without losing any meaning. Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> --- kernel/context_tracking.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)