diff mbox

[1/1] iwmc3200: add more SDIO device ids

Message ID 1251149659-32212-1-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Winkler, Tomas Aug. 24, 2009, 9:34 p.m. UTC
add WiFi BGN SKU and WiMAX 2.4GHz SKU device ids

Cc:inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com
Cc:cindy.h.kao@intel.com
Cc:yi.zhu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
---
 include/linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Comments

Luis Rodriguez Aug. 24, 2009, 9:36 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Tomas Winkler<tomas.winkler@intel.com> wrote:
> add WiFi BGN SKU and WiMAX 2.4GHz SKU device ids
>
> Cc:inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com
> Cc:cindy.h.kao@intel.com
> Cc:yi.zhu@intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>

Since it seems we are preferring to not do this for PCI for cases
where the ID will only be used for 1 device perhaps its best to remove
all those ids and stuff them directly into the intel driver itself
that will use it.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tomas Winkler Aug. 24, 2009, 10:20 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez<mcgrof@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Tomas Winkler<tomas.winkler@intel.com> wrote:
>> add WiFi BGN SKU and WiMAX 2.4GHz SKU device ids
>>
>> Cc:inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com
>> Cc:cindy.h.kao@intel.com
>> Cc:yi.zhu@intel.com
>> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
>
> Since it seems we are preferring to not do this for PCI for cases
> where the ID will only be used for 1 device perhaps its best to remove
> all those ids and stuff them directly into the intel driver itself
> that will use it.
>
I don't have strong opinion about it but this is the current habit
IIRC there was a mail thread that explicitly asked to move SDIO IDs
there,  of course I cannot locate it right now :(

Thanks
Tomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Luis Rodriguez Aug. 24, 2009, 10:29 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Tomas Winkler<tomasw@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez<mcgrof@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Tomas Winkler<tomas.winkler@intel.com> wrote:
>>> add WiFi BGN SKU and WiMAX 2.4GHz SKU device ids
>>>
>>> Cc:inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com
>>> Cc:cindy.h.kao@intel.com
>>> Cc:yi.zhu@intel.com
>>> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
>>
>> Since it seems we are preferring to not do this for PCI for cases
>> where the ID will only be used for 1 device perhaps its best to remove
>> all those ids and stuff them directly into the intel driver itself
>> that will use it.
>>
> I don't have strong opinion about it but this is the current habit
> IIRC there was a mail thread that explicitly asked to move SDIO IDs
> there,  of course I cannot locate it right now :(

Sure, understood, whoever maintains this should decide.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Bob Copeland Aug. 24, 2009, 10:37 p.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Tomas Winkler<tomasw@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't have strong opinion about it but this is the current habit
> IIRC there was a mail thread that explicitly asked to move SDIO IDs
> there,  of course I cannot locate it right now :(

This one:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=124489211911222&w=2

Of course, Pierre is no longer maintainer and there are only a few
IDs there, so I don't think anyone will shout either way.
Marcel Holtmann Aug. 24, 2009, 11:21 p.m. UTC | #5
Hi Tomas,

> >> add WiFi BGN SKU and WiMAX 2.4GHz SKU device ids
> >>
> >> Cc:inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com
> >> Cc:cindy.h.kao@intel.com
> >> Cc:yi.zhu@intel.com
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
> >
> > Since it seems we are preferring to not do this for PCI for cases
> > where the ID will only be used for 1 device perhaps its best to remove
> > all those ids and stuff them directly into the intel driver itself
> > that will use it.
> >
> I don't have strong opinion about it but this is the current habit
> IIRC there was a mail thread that explicitly asked to move SDIO IDs
> there,  of course I cannot locate it right now :(

first thing is that IDs should only be added if there are users for it.
I am missing the patches that are actually using them. Send them all
together.

Second, we have to establish what is the preferred method of IDs for the
SDIO subsystem. In general I would prefer we have a global policy for
this, but in reality it is up to the subsystem maintainers.

My personal vote is for keeping all IDs inside the drivers. And I also
prefer to keep the plain hex values and just put a comment above them
which device this is. Something like this:

static struct usb_device_id btusb_table[] = {
	/* Generic Bluetooth USB device */
	{ USB_DEVICE_INFO(0xe0, 0x01, 0x01) },

	/* AVM BlueFRITZ! USB v2.0 */
	{ USB_DEVICE(0x057c, 0x3800) },

	{ }	/* Terminating entry */
};

Regards

Marcel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Holger Schurig Aug. 26, 2009, 7:25 a.m. UTC | #6
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 01:21:58 Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> My personal vote is for keeping all IDs inside the drivers.
> And I also prefer to keep the plain hex values and just put a
> comment above them which device this is. Something like this:
>
> static struct usb_device_id btusb_table[] = {
> 	/* Generic Bluetooth USB device */
> 	{ USB_DEVICE_INFO(0xe0, 0x01, 0x01) },

+1

When I have an unknown device (and not compiled all modules) it's 
so much easier to do an

grep -ri 057c drivers/usb

then to do the same on include/ and then again to find the driver 
that uses this id. For the same reason, I prefer 0x057c in the 
source and not 0x57c.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h b/include/linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h
index 2dbfb5a..addd456 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ 
 #define SDIO_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IWMC3200TOP	0x1404
 #define SDIO_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IWMC3200GPS	0x1405
 #define SDIO_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IWMC3200BT		0x1406
+#define SDIO_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IWMC3200WIMAX_24	0x1407
+#define SDIO_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IWMC3200WIFI_BGN	0x1408
 
 #define SDIO_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL			0x02df
 #define SDIO_DEVICE_ID_MARVELL_LIBERTAS		0x9103