| Message ID | 1412246294-27370-1-git-send-email-alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi, On 02/10/2014 at 12:38:14 +0200, Alexander Stein wrote : > Add the missing CAN devices node including their pin muxing and clocks. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> > --- > I could actually only test CAN1 due to the hardware I had available. Also > CAN0 conflicts with DBGU pins, which I had to use. > > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi > index e1a5c70..0a2164e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi > @@ -763,6 +795,22 @@ > }; > }; > > + can0 { > + pinctrl_can0_rx_tx: can0_rx_tx { > + atmel,pins = > + <AT91_PIOA 9 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_NONE /* PA9 periph B RX */ > + AT91_PIOA 10 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_NONE>; /* PA10 periph B TX */ I would stop adding that comment as this is pretty clear that your are setting PA9 and P10 to periph B. A more useful kind of comment is what pin it conflicts with. Maybe something like: <AT91_PIOA 9 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_NONE /* CANRX0, conflicts with DRXD */ > + }; > + }; > + > + can1 { > + pinctrl_can1_rx_tx: can1_rx_tx { > + atmel,pins = > + <AT91_PIOA 6 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_NONE /* PA6 periph B RX */ > + AT91_PIOA 5 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_NONE>; /* PA5 periph B TX */ ditto > + }; > + }; > + > pioA: gpio@fffff400 { > compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-gpio", "atmel,at91rm9200-gpio"; > reg = <0xfffff400 0x200>; > -- > 2.0.4 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi index e1a5c70..0a2164e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi @@ -363,6 +363,16 @@ #clock-cells = <0>; reg = <28>; }; + + can0_clk: can0_clk { + #clock-cells = <0>; + reg = <29>; + }; + + can1_clk: can1_clk { + #clock-cells = <0>; + reg = <30>; + }; }; }; @@ -407,6 +417,28 @@ }; }; + can0: can@f8000000 { + compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-can"; + reg = <0xf8000000 0x300>; + interrupts = <29 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 3>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_can0_rx_tx>; + clocks = <&can0_clk>; + clock-names = "can_clk"; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + can1: can@f8004000 { + compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-can"; + reg = <0xf8004000 0x300>; + interrupts = <30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 3>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_can1_rx_tx>; + clocks = <&can1_clk>; + clock-names = "can_clk"; + status = "disabled"; + }; + tcb0: timer@f8008000 { compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-tcb"; reg = <0xf8008000 0x100>; @@ -763,6 +795,22 @@ }; }; + can0 { + pinctrl_can0_rx_tx: can0_rx_tx { + atmel,pins = + <AT91_PIOA 9 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_NONE /* PA9 periph B RX */ + AT91_PIOA 10 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_NONE>; /* PA10 periph B TX */ + }; + }; + + can1 { + pinctrl_can1_rx_tx: can1_rx_tx { + atmel,pins = + <AT91_PIOA 6 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_NONE /* PA6 periph B RX */ + AT91_PIOA 5 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_NONE>; /* PA5 periph B TX */ + }; + }; + pioA: gpio@fffff400 { compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-gpio", "atmel,at91rm9200-gpio"; reg = <0xfffff400 0x200>;
Add the missing CAN devices node including their pin muxing and clocks. Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> --- I could actually only test CAN1 due to the hardware I had available. Also CAN0 conflicts with DBGU pins, which I had to use. arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)