Message ID | 20090916011554.GD32194@mag.az.mvista.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
"Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com> writes: > From: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> > > Add RTC support for the da830/omap-l137 and da850/omap-l138 > SoC's by leveraging existing the rtc-omap driver. > > Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Can you re-send this rtc-omap patch and Cc linux-omap@vger.kernel.org? http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/msg/4b688b755bf93cb4?dmode=source This will probably have to be Ack'd by omap folks since some omap code will have to be changed to update platform drivers. Thanks, Kevin > --- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c | 4 +++ > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c | 4 +++ > arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h | 1 + > drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 7 +++-- > 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c > index dfc4897..fb76721 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c > @@ -217,6 +217,10 @@ static __init void da830_evm_init(void) > if (ret) > pr_warning("da830_evm_init: lcd setup failed: %d\n", ret); > #endif > + > + ret = da8xx_register_rtc(); > + if (ret) > + pr_warning("da830_evm_init: rtc setup failed: %d\n", ret); > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c > index da1a6fb..47619a9 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c > @@ -381,6 +381,10 @@ static __init void da850_evm_init(void) > if (ret) > pr_warning("da850_evm_init: lcdc registration failed: %d\n", > ret); > + > + ret = da8xx_register_rtc(); > + if (ret) > + pr_warning("da850_evm_init: rtc setup failed: %d\n", ret); > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c > index 5595613..dd0ea08 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ > #define DA8XX_TPTC1_BASE 0x01c08400 > #define DA8XX_WDOG_BASE 0x01c21000 /* DA8XX_TIMER64P1_BASE */ > #define DA8XX_I2C0_BASE 0x01c22000 > +#define DA8XX_RTC_BASE 0x01C23000 > #define DA8XX_EMAC_CPPI_PORT_BASE 0x01e20000 > #define DA8XX_EMAC_CPGMACSS_BASE 0x01e22000 > #define DA8XX_EMAC_CPGMAC_BASE 0x01e23000 > @@ -453,3 +454,37 @@ int __init da8xx_register_mmcsd0(struct davinci_mmc_config *config) > da8xx_mmcsd0_device.dev.platform_data = config; > return platform_device_register(&da8xx_mmcsd0_device); > } > + > +static struct resource da8xx_rtc_resources[] = { > + { > + .start = DA8XX_RTC_BASE, > + .end = DA8XX_RTC_BASE + SZ_4K - 1, > + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM, > + }, > + { /* timer irq */ > + .start = IRQ_DA8XX_RTC, > + .end = IRQ_DA8XX_RTC, > + .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ, > + }, > + { /* alarm irq */ > + .start = IRQ_DA8XX_RTC, > + .end = IRQ_DA8XX_RTC, > + .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ, > + }, > +}; > + > +static struct platform_device da8xx_rtc_device = { > + .name = "omap_rtc", > + .id = -1, > + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_rtc_resources), > + .resource = da8xx_rtc_resources, > +}; > + > +int da8xx_register_rtc(void) > +{ > + /* Unlock the rtc's registers */ > + __raw_writel(0x83e70b13, IO_ADDRESS(DA8XX_RTC_BASE + 0x6c)); > + __raw_writel(0x95a4f1e0, IO_ADDRESS(DA8XX_RTC_BASE + 0x70)); > + > + return platform_device_register(&da8xx_rtc_device); > +} > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h > index 375a3f7..a152261 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ int da8xx_register_emac(void); > int da8xx_register_lcdc(struct da8xx_lcdc_platform_data *pdata); > int da8xx_register_mmcsd0(struct davinci_mmc_config *config); > void __init da8xx_register_mcasp(int id, struct snd_platform_data *pdata); > +int da8xx_register_rtc(void); > > extern struct platform_device da8xx_serial_device; > extern struct emac_platform_data da8xx_emac_pdata; > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig > index e104be3..b79320d 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig > @@ -548,10 +548,11 @@ comment "on-CPU RTC drivers" > > config RTC_DRV_OMAP > tristate "TI OMAP1" > - depends on ARCH_OMAP15XX || ARCH_OMAP16XX || ARCH_OMAP730 > + depends on ARCH_OMAP15XX || ARCH_OMAP16XX || ARCH_OMAP730 || ARCH_DAVINCI_DA8XX > help > - Say "yes" here to support the real time clock on TI OMAP1 chips. > - This driver can also be built as a module called rtc-omap. > + Say "yes" here to support the real time clock on TI OMAP1 and > + DA8xx/OMAP-L13x chips. This driver can also be built as a > + module called rtc-omap. > > config RTC_DRV_S3C > tristate "Samsung S3C series SoC RTC" > -- > 1.6.2.5.182.ga808d > > > _______________________________________________ > Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list > Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com > http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 08:01:27AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com> writes: > > > From: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> > > > > Add RTC support for the da830/omap-l137 and da850/omap-l138 > > SoC's by leveraging existing the rtc-omap driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> > > Can you re-send this rtc-omap patch and Cc linux-omap@vger.kernel.org? > > http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/msg/4b688b755bf93cb4?dmode=source > > This will probably have to be Ack'd by omap folks since some omap code > will have to be changed to update platform drivers. I've already submitted a patch there for the driver changes, http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/browse_thread/thread/e3f5de9551453d92# I guess I messed up and should have put the Kconfig changes in that patch instead of this one. Let me resubmit both patches with all the drivers/rtc/ changes in one patch that goes to rtc-linux. Mark --
"Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com> writes: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 08:01:27AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com> writes: >> >> > From: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> >> > >> > Add RTC support for the da830/omap-l137 and da850/omap-l138 >> > SoC's by leveraging existing the rtc-omap driver. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> >> >> Can you re-send this rtc-omap patch and Cc linux-omap@vger.kernel.org? >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/msg/4b688b755bf93cb4?dmode=source >> >> This will probably have to be Ack'd by omap folks since some omap code >> will have to be changed to update platform drivers. > > I've already submitted a patch there for the driver changes, > > http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/browse_thread/thread/e3f5de9551453d92# When you re-send it and Cc linux-omap? The OMAP folks will have to do some platform_device rework before this can go upstream. > I guess I messed up and should have put the Kconfig changes in that > patch instead of this one. Let me resubmit both patches with all the > drivers/rtc/ changes in one patch that goes to rtc-linux. I'll just drop the Kconfig change in $SUBJECT patch before pushing upstream. No need to resend. Thanks, Kevin
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:01:16AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 08:01:27AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com> writes: > >> > >> > From: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> > >> > > >> > Add RTC support for the da830/omap-l137 and da850/omap-l138 > >> > SoC's by leveraging existing the rtc-omap driver. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> > >> > >> Can you re-send this rtc-omap patch and Cc linux-omap@vger.kernel.org? > >> > >> http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/msg/4b688b755bf93cb4?dmode=source > >> > >> This will probably have to be Ack'd by omap folks since some omap code > >> will have to be changed to update platform drivers. > > > > I've already submitted a patch there for the driver changes, > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/browse_thread/thread/e3f5de9551453d92# > > When you re-send it and Cc linux-omap? The OMAP folks will have to do > some platform_device rework before this can go upstream. It shouldn't be necessary. The only other user of "omap_rtc" is arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c which has the platform_device already set up. I'll cc them, though. Mark --
"Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com> writes: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:01:16AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 08:01:27AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> >> "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com> writes: >> >> >> >> > From: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> >> >> > >> >> > Add RTC support for the da830/omap-l137 and da850/omap-l138 >> >> > SoC's by leveraging existing the rtc-omap driver. >> >> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> >> >> >> >> Can you re-send this rtc-omap patch and Cc linux-omap@vger.kernel.org? >> >> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/msg/4b688b755bf93cb4?dmode=source >> >> >> >> This will probably have to be Ack'd by omap folks since some omap code >> >> will have to be changed to update platform drivers. >> > >> > I've already submitted a patch there for the driver changes, >> > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/browse_thread/thread/e3f5de9551453d92# >> >> When you re-send it and Cc linux-omap? The OMAP folks will have to do >> some platform_device rework before this can go upstream. > > It shouldn't be necessary. The only other user of "omap_rtc" > is arch/arm/mach-omap1/devices.c which has the platform_device > already set up. Ah, ok. I didn't look, but assumed there would be others. You might want to mention that in the changelog so folks like me who are too lazy to look wont get paranoid. ;) Kevin
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c index dfc4897..fb76721 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-evm.c @@ -217,6 +217,10 @@ static __init void da830_evm_init(void) if (ret) pr_warning("da830_evm_init: lcd setup failed: %d\n", ret); #endif + + ret = da8xx_register_rtc(); + if (ret) + pr_warning("da830_evm_init: rtc setup failed: %d\n", ret); } #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c index da1a6fb..47619a9 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c @@ -381,6 +381,10 @@ static __init void da850_evm_init(void) if (ret) pr_warning("da850_evm_init: lcdc registration failed: %d\n", ret); + + ret = da8xx_register_rtc(); + if (ret) + pr_warning("da850_evm_init: rtc setup failed: %d\n", ret); } #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c index 5595613..dd0ea08 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #define DA8XX_TPTC1_BASE 0x01c08400 #define DA8XX_WDOG_BASE 0x01c21000 /* DA8XX_TIMER64P1_BASE */ #define DA8XX_I2C0_BASE 0x01c22000 +#define DA8XX_RTC_BASE 0x01C23000 #define DA8XX_EMAC_CPPI_PORT_BASE 0x01e20000 #define DA8XX_EMAC_CPGMACSS_BASE 0x01e22000 #define DA8XX_EMAC_CPGMAC_BASE 0x01e23000 @@ -453,3 +454,37 @@ int __init da8xx_register_mmcsd0(struct davinci_mmc_config *config) da8xx_mmcsd0_device.dev.platform_data = config; return platform_device_register(&da8xx_mmcsd0_device); } + +static struct resource da8xx_rtc_resources[] = { + { + .start = DA8XX_RTC_BASE, + .end = DA8XX_RTC_BASE + SZ_4K - 1, + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM, + }, + { /* timer irq */ + .start = IRQ_DA8XX_RTC, + .end = IRQ_DA8XX_RTC, + .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ, + }, + { /* alarm irq */ + .start = IRQ_DA8XX_RTC, + .end = IRQ_DA8XX_RTC, + .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ, + }, +}; + +static struct platform_device da8xx_rtc_device = { + .name = "omap_rtc", + .id = -1, + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da8xx_rtc_resources), + .resource = da8xx_rtc_resources, +}; + +int da8xx_register_rtc(void) +{ + /* Unlock the rtc's registers */ + __raw_writel(0x83e70b13, IO_ADDRESS(DA8XX_RTC_BASE + 0x6c)); + __raw_writel(0x95a4f1e0, IO_ADDRESS(DA8XX_RTC_BASE + 0x70)); + + return platform_device_register(&da8xx_rtc_device); +} diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h index 375a3f7..a152261 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ int da8xx_register_emac(void); int da8xx_register_lcdc(struct da8xx_lcdc_platform_data *pdata); int da8xx_register_mmcsd0(struct davinci_mmc_config *config); void __init da8xx_register_mcasp(int id, struct snd_platform_data *pdata); +int da8xx_register_rtc(void); extern struct platform_device da8xx_serial_device; extern struct emac_platform_data da8xx_emac_pdata; diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig index e104be3..b79320d 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig @@ -548,10 +548,11 @@ comment "on-CPU RTC drivers" config RTC_DRV_OMAP tristate "TI OMAP1" - depends on ARCH_OMAP15XX || ARCH_OMAP16XX || ARCH_OMAP730 + depends on ARCH_OMAP15XX || ARCH_OMAP16XX || ARCH_OMAP730 || ARCH_DAVINCI_DA8XX help - Say "yes" here to support the real time clock on TI OMAP1 chips. - This driver can also be built as a module called rtc-omap. + Say "yes" here to support the real time clock on TI OMAP1 and + DA8xx/OMAP-L13x chips. This driver can also be built as a + module called rtc-omap. config RTC_DRV_S3C tristate "Samsung S3C series SoC RTC"