| Message ID | 1412872737-624-5-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hello, On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 06:38:40PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Before this change it was only possible to set get_temp() and get_trend() > methods to be used in the common code handling passing parameters via > device tree to "cpu-thermal" CPU thermal zone device. > > Now it is possible to also set emulated value of temperature for debug > purposes. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- > include/linux/thermal.h | 6 ++++-- > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c > index cd74e64..f206375 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c > @@ -98,10 +98,22 @@ struct __thermal_zone { > void *sensor_data; > int (*get_temp)(void *, long *); > int (*get_trend)(void *, long *); > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long); > }; > > /*** DT thermal zone device callbacks ***/ > > +static int of_thermal_set_emul_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, > + unsigned long temp) > +{ > + struct __thermal_zone *data = tz->devdata; > + > + if (!data->set_emul_temp) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + return data->set_emul_temp(data->sensor_data, temp); > +} > + > static int of_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, > unsigned long *temp) > { > @@ -352,7 +364,8 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device * > thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node *zone, > struct device_node *sensor, void *data, > int (*get_temp)(void *, long *), > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)) > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long)) Thanks for improving the API. However, looking at what is above, it starts to be pretty ugly. And for sure, this is not the last callback to be added. I believe it is time to add a .ops in the of-thermal. While in here, do you mind adding the .ops in a separated patch, then add the .set_emul_temp in the .ops field? > { > struct thermal_zone_device *tzd; > struct __thermal_zone *tz; > @@ -366,10 +379,12 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node *zone, > mutex_lock(&tzd->lock); > tz->get_temp = get_temp; > tz->get_trend = get_trend; > + tz->set_emul_temp = set_emul_temp; > tz->sensor_data = data; > > tzd->ops->get_temp = of_thermal_get_temp; > tzd->ops->get_trend = of_thermal_get_trend; > + tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = of_thermal_set_emul_temp; > mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock); > > return tzd; > @@ -411,7 +426,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node *zone, > struct thermal_zone_device * > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int sensor_id, > void *data, int (*get_temp)(void *, long *), > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)) > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long)) > { > struct device_node *np, *child, *sensor_np; > > @@ -453,7 +469,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int sensor_id, > return thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(child, sensor_np, > data, > get_temp, > - get_trend); > + get_trend, > + set_emul_temp); > } > } > of_node_put(np); > @@ -494,9 +511,11 @@ void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct device *dev, > mutex_lock(&tzd->lock); > tzd->ops->get_temp = NULL; > tzd->ops->get_trend = NULL; > + tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = NULL; > > tz->get_temp = NULL; > tz->get_trend = NULL; > + tz->set_emul_temp = NULL; > tz->sensor_data = NULL; > mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock); > } > diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h > index 0305cde..36010e9 100644 > --- a/include/linux/thermal.h > +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h > @@ -290,14 +290,16 @@ struct thermal_genl_event { > struct thermal_zone_device * > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id, > void *data, int (*get_temp)(void *, long *), > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)); > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long)); > void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct device *dev, > struct thermal_zone_device *tz); > #else > static inline struct thermal_zone_device * > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id, > void *data, int (*get_temp)(void *, long *), > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)) > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long)) > { > return NULL; > } > -- > 2.0.0.rc2 >
Hi Eduardo, > Hello, > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 06:38:40PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Before this change it was only possible to set get_temp() and > > get_trend() methods to be used in the common code handling passing > > parameters via device tree to "cpu-thermal" CPU thermal zone device. > > > > Now it is possible to also set emulated value of temperature for > > debug purposes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> > > --- > > drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > include/linux/thermal.h | 6 ++++-- > > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c > > b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c index cd74e64..f206375 100644 > > --- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c > > @@ -98,10 +98,22 @@ struct __thermal_zone { > > void *sensor_data; > > int (*get_temp)(void *, long *); > > int (*get_trend)(void *, long *); > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long); > > }; > > > > /*** DT thermal zone device callbacks ***/ > > > > +static int of_thermal_set_emul_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, > > + unsigned long temp) > > +{ > > + struct __thermal_zone *data = tz->devdata; > > + > > + if (!data->set_emul_temp) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + return data->set_emul_temp(data->sensor_data, temp); > > +} > > + > > static int of_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, > > unsigned long *temp) > > { > > @@ -352,7 +364,8 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device * > > thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node *zone, > > struct device_node *sensor, void *data, > > int (*get_temp)(void *, long *), > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)) > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned > > long)) > > Thanks for improving the API. However, looking at what is above, it > starts to be pretty ugly. And for sure, this is not the last callback > to be added. Presumably there would be some more callbacks. > I believe it is time to add a .ops in the of-thermal. > While in here, do you mind adding the .ops in a separated patch, then > add the .set_emul_temp in the .ops field? I will add an option to pass .ops with thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(). I'm only concerned a bit about testing other users of of-thermal. I have only beaglebone black (BBB) for testing, which on-soc bandgap thermal sensor is very inaccurate and hence not supported even at BBB github linux kernel repository (v3.14). Because of above I would need your support for testing. > > > { > > struct thermal_zone_device *tzd; > > struct __thermal_zone *tz; > > @@ -366,10 +379,12 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node > > *zone, mutex_lock(&tzd->lock); > > tz->get_temp = get_temp; > > tz->get_trend = get_trend; > > + tz->set_emul_temp = set_emul_temp; > > tz->sensor_data = data; > > > > tzd->ops->get_temp = of_thermal_get_temp; > > tzd->ops->get_trend = of_thermal_get_trend; > > + tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = of_thermal_set_emul_temp; > > mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock); > > > > return tzd; > > @@ -411,7 +426,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node > > *zone, struct thermal_zone_device * > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int sensor_id, > > void *data, int (*get_temp)(void > > *, long *), > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)) > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, > > unsigned long)) { > > struct device_node *np, *child, *sensor_np; > > > > @@ -453,7 +469,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device > > *dev, int sensor_id, return thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(child, > > sensor_np, data, > > get_temp, > > - > > get_trend); > > + > > get_trend, > > + > > set_emul_temp); } > > } > > of_node_put(np); > > @@ -494,9 +511,11 @@ void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct > > device *dev, mutex_lock(&tzd->lock); > > tzd->ops->get_temp = NULL; > > tzd->ops->get_trend = NULL; > > + tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = NULL; > > > > tz->get_temp = NULL; > > tz->get_trend = NULL; > > + tz->set_emul_temp = NULL; > > tz->sensor_data = NULL; > > mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock); > > } > > diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h > > index 0305cde..36010e9 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/thermal.h > > +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h > > @@ -290,14 +290,16 @@ struct thermal_genl_event { > > struct thermal_zone_device * > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id, > > void *data, int (*get_temp)(void > > *, long *), > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)); > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, > > unsigned long)); void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct > > device *dev, struct thermal_zone_device *tz); > > #else > > static inline struct thermal_zone_device * > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id, > > void *data, int (*get_temp)(void > > *, long *), > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)) > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, > > unsigned long)) { > > return NULL; > > } > > -- > > 2.0.0.rc2 > >
Lukasz, On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 12:20:35PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Eduardo, > > > Hello, > > > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 06:38:40PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > Before this change it was only possible to set get_temp() and > > > get_trend() methods to be used in the common code handling passing > > > parameters via device tree to "cpu-thermal" CPU thermal zone device. > > > > > > Now it is possible to also set emulated value of temperature for > > > debug purposes. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > > include/linux/thermal.h | 6 ++++-- > > > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c > > > b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c index cd74e64..f206375 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c > > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c > > > @@ -98,10 +98,22 @@ struct __thermal_zone { > > > void *sensor_data; > > > int (*get_temp)(void *, long *); > > > int (*get_trend)(void *, long *); > > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long); > > > }; > > > > > > /*** DT thermal zone device callbacks ***/ > > > > > > +static int of_thermal_set_emul_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, > > > + unsigned long temp) > > > +{ > > > + struct __thermal_zone *data = tz->devdata; > > > + > > > + if (!data->set_emul_temp) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > + return data->set_emul_temp(data->sensor_data, temp); > > > +} > > > + > > > static int of_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, > > > unsigned long *temp) > > > { > > > @@ -352,7 +364,8 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device * > > > thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node *zone, > > > struct device_node *sensor, void *data, > > > int (*get_temp)(void *, long *), > > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)) > > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), > > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned > > > long)) > > > > Thanks for improving the API. However, looking at what is above, it > > starts to be pretty ugly. And for sure, this is not the last callback > > to be added. > > Presumably there would be some more callbacks. > > > I believe it is time to add a .ops in the of-thermal. > > While in here, do you mind adding the .ops in a separated patch, then > > add the .set_emul_temp in the .ops field? > > I will add an option to pass .ops with thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(). > > I'm only concerned a bit about testing other users of of-thermal. > I have only beaglebone black (BBB) for testing, which on-soc bandgap > thermal sensor is very inaccurate and hence not supported even at BBB > github linux kernel repository (v3.14). > > Because of above I would need your support for testing. > I did the .ops part that is required for your patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5329801/ As you already reviewed it. Do you mind refreshing your series on top of it? Cheers, > > > > > { > > > struct thermal_zone_device *tzd; > > > struct __thermal_zone *tz; > > > @@ -366,10 +379,12 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node > > > *zone, mutex_lock(&tzd->lock); > > > tz->get_temp = get_temp; > > > tz->get_trend = get_trend; > > > + tz->set_emul_temp = set_emul_temp; > > > tz->sensor_data = data; > > > > > > tzd->ops->get_temp = of_thermal_get_temp; > > > tzd->ops->get_trend = of_thermal_get_trend; > > > + tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = of_thermal_set_emul_temp; > > > mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock); > > > > > > return tzd; > > > @@ -411,7 +426,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node > > > *zone, struct thermal_zone_device * > > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int sensor_id, > > > void *data, int (*get_temp)(void > > > *, long *), > > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)) > > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), > > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, > > > unsigned long)) { > > > struct device_node *np, *child, *sensor_np; > > > > > > @@ -453,7 +469,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device > > > *dev, int sensor_id, return thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(child, > > > sensor_np, data, > > > get_temp, > > > - > > > get_trend); > > > + > > > get_trend, > > > + > > > set_emul_temp); } > > > } > > > of_node_put(np); > > > @@ -494,9 +511,11 @@ void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct > > > device *dev, mutex_lock(&tzd->lock); > > > tzd->ops->get_temp = NULL; > > > tzd->ops->get_trend = NULL; > > > + tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = NULL; > > > > > > tz->get_temp = NULL; > > > tz->get_trend = NULL; > > > + tz->set_emul_temp = NULL; > > > tz->sensor_data = NULL; > > > mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock); > > > } > > > diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h > > > index 0305cde..36010e9 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/thermal.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h > > > @@ -290,14 +290,16 @@ struct thermal_genl_event { > > > struct thermal_zone_device * > > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id, > > > void *data, int (*get_temp)(void > > > *, long *), > > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)); > > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), > > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, > > > unsigned long)); void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct > > > device *dev, struct thermal_zone_device *tz); > > > #else > > > static inline struct thermal_zone_device * > > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id, > > > void *data, int (*get_temp)(void > > > *, long *), > > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)) > > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), > > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, > > > unsigned long)) { > > > return NULL; > > > } > > > -- > > > 2.0.0.rc2 > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > Lukasz Majewski > > Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:23:29 -0400 Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> wrote: > Lukasz, > > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 12:20:35PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Hi Eduardo, > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 06:38:40PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > > Before this change it was only possible to set get_temp() and > > > > get_trend() methods to be used in the common code handling > > > > passing parameters via device tree to "cpu-thermal" CPU thermal > > > > zone device. > > > > > > > > Now it is possible to also set emulated value of temperature for > > > > debug purposes. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > > > include/linux/thermal.h | 6 ++++-- > > > > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c > > > > b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c index cd74e64..f206375 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c > > > > @@ -98,10 +98,22 @@ struct __thermal_zone { > > > > void *sensor_data; > > > > int (*get_temp)(void *, long *); > > > > int (*get_trend)(void *, long *); > > > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long); > > > > }; > > > > > > > > /*** DT thermal zone device callbacks ***/ > > > > > > > > +static int of_thermal_set_emul_temp(struct thermal_zone_device > > > > *tz, > > > > + unsigned long temp) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct __thermal_zone *data = tz->devdata; > > > > + > > > > + if (!data->set_emul_temp) > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > + > > > > + return data->set_emul_temp(data->sensor_data, temp); > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > static int of_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, > > > > unsigned long *temp) > > > > { > > > > @@ -352,7 +364,8 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device * > > > > thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node *zone, > > > > struct device_node *sensor, void > > > > *data, int (*get_temp)(void *, long *), > > > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)) > > > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), > > > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, > > > > unsigned long)) > > > > > > Thanks for improving the API. However, looking at what is above, > > > it starts to be pretty ugly. And for sure, this is not the last > > > callback to be added. > > > > Presumably there would be some more callbacks. > > > > > I believe it is time to add a .ops in the of-thermal. > > > While in here, do you mind adding the .ops in a separated patch, > > > then add the .set_emul_temp in the .ops field? > > > > I will add an option to pass .ops with thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(). > > > > I'm only concerned a bit about testing other users of of-thermal. > > I have only beaglebone black (BBB) for testing, which on-soc bandgap > > thermal sensor is very inaccurate and hence not supported even at > > BBB github linux kernel repository (v3.14). > > > > Because of above I would need your support for testing. > > > > I did the .ops part that is required for your patch: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5329801/ > > As you already reviewed it. Do you mind refreshing your series on top > of it? Yours patches were almost identical to mine. I will wait maybe two more days, and if nobody opposed to your concept, I send my work on top of your patch. Best regards, Lukasz Majewski > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > { > > > > struct thermal_zone_device *tzd; > > > > struct __thermal_zone *tz; > > > > @@ -366,10 +379,12 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct > > > > device_node *zone, mutex_lock(&tzd->lock); > > > > tz->get_temp = get_temp; > > > > tz->get_trend = get_trend; > > > > + tz->set_emul_temp = set_emul_temp; > > > > tz->sensor_data = data; > > > > > > > > tzd->ops->get_temp = of_thermal_get_temp; > > > > tzd->ops->get_trend = of_thermal_get_trend; > > > > + tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = of_thermal_set_emul_temp; > > > > mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock); > > > > > > > > return tzd; > > > > @@ -411,7 +426,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct > > > > device_node *zone, struct thermal_zone_device * > > > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int > > > > sensor_id, void *data, int (*get_temp)(void > > > > *, long *), > > > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long > > > > *)) > > > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long > > > > *), > > > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, > > > > unsigned long)) { > > > > struct device_node *np, *child, *sensor_np; > > > > > > > > @@ -453,7 +469,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct > > > > device *dev, int sensor_id, return > > > > thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(child, sensor_np, data, > > > > get_temp, > > > > - > > > > get_trend); > > > > + > > > > get_trend, > > > > + > > > > set_emul_temp); } > > > > } > > > > of_node_put(np); > > > > @@ -494,9 +511,11 @@ void > > > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct device *dev, > > > > mutex_lock(&tzd->lock); tzd->ops->get_temp = NULL; > > > > tzd->ops->get_trend = NULL; > > > > + tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = NULL; > > > > > > > > tz->get_temp = NULL; > > > > tz->get_trend = NULL; > > > > + tz->set_emul_temp = NULL; > > > > tz->sensor_data = NULL; > > > > mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock); > > > > } > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h > > > > index 0305cde..36010e9 100644 > > > > --- a/include/linux/thermal.h > > > > +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h > > > > @@ -290,14 +290,16 @@ struct thermal_genl_event { > > > > struct thermal_zone_device * > > > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id, > > > > void *data, int > > > > (*get_temp)(void *, long *), > > > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long > > > > *)); > > > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long > > > > *), > > > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, > > > > unsigned long)); void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct > > > > device *dev, struct thermal_zone_device *tz); > > > > #else > > > > static inline struct thermal_zone_device * > > > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id, > > > > void *data, int > > > > (*get_temp)(void *, long *), > > > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long > > > > *)) > > > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long > > > > *), > > > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, > > > > unsigned long)) { > > > > return NULL; > > > > } > > > > -- > > > > 2.0.0.rc2 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > Lukasz Majewski > > > > Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c index cd74e64..f206375 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c @@ -98,10 +98,22 @@ struct __thermal_zone { void *sensor_data; int (*get_temp)(void *, long *); int (*get_trend)(void *, long *); + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long); }; /*** DT thermal zone device callbacks ***/ +static int of_thermal_set_emul_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, + unsigned long temp) +{ + struct __thermal_zone *data = tz->devdata; + + if (!data->set_emul_temp) + return -EINVAL; + + return data->set_emul_temp(data->sensor_data, temp); +} + static int of_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, unsigned long *temp) { @@ -352,7 +364,8 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device * thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node *zone, struct device_node *sensor, void *data, int (*get_temp)(void *, long *), - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)) + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long)) { struct thermal_zone_device *tzd; struct __thermal_zone *tz; @@ -366,10 +379,12 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node *zone, mutex_lock(&tzd->lock); tz->get_temp = get_temp; tz->get_trend = get_trend; + tz->set_emul_temp = set_emul_temp; tz->sensor_data = data; tzd->ops->get_temp = of_thermal_get_temp; tzd->ops->get_trend = of_thermal_get_trend; + tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = of_thermal_set_emul_temp; mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock); return tzd; @@ -411,7 +426,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node *zone, struct thermal_zone_device * thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int sensor_id, void *data, int (*get_temp)(void *, long *), - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)) + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long)) { struct device_node *np, *child, *sensor_np; @@ -453,7 +469,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int sensor_id, return thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(child, sensor_np, data, get_temp, - get_trend); + get_trend, + set_emul_temp); } } of_node_put(np); @@ -494,9 +511,11 @@ void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct device *dev, mutex_lock(&tzd->lock); tzd->ops->get_temp = NULL; tzd->ops->get_trend = NULL; + tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = NULL; tz->get_temp = NULL; tz->get_trend = NULL; + tz->set_emul_temp = NULL; tz->sensor_data = NULL; mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock); } diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h index 0305cde..36010e9 100644 --- a/include/linux/thermal.h +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h @@ -290,14 +290,16 @@ struct thermal_genl_event { struct thermal_zone_device * thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id, void *data, int (*get_temp)(void *, long *), - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)); + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long)); void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct device *dev, struct thermal_zone_device *tz); #else static inline struct thermal_zone_device * thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id, void *data, int (*get_temp)(void *, long *), - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *)) + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *), + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long)) { return NULL; }
Before this change it was only possible to set get_temp() and get_trend() methods to be used in the common code handling passing parameters via device tree to "cpu-thermal" CPU thermal zone device. Now it is possible to also set emulated value of temperature for debug purposes. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> --- drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- include/linux/thermal.h | 6 ++++-- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)