| Message ID | 20141224055521.GA16313@epbyminw1710.minsk.epam.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 08:55:21AM +0300, Aliaskei Tulia wrote: > drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_xmit.c:2375 warning: symbol > 'rtw_ack_tx_done23a' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Function 'rtw_ack_tx_done23a' seems to be unused in current staging > code. > > Signed-off-by: Aliaskei Tulia <Aliaksei_Tulia@epam.com> This email address doesn't match your From: line :( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_xmit.c index 7a5e6bf..1c82dff 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_xmit.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_xmit.c @@ -2372,12 +2372,3 @@ int rtw_ack_tx_wait23a(struct xmit_priv *pxmitpriv, u32 timeout_ms) return rtw_sctx_wait23a(pack_tx_ops); } -void rtw_ack_tx_done23a(struct xmit_priv *pxmitpriv, int status) -{ - struct submit_ctx *pack_tx_ops = &pxmitpriv->ack_tx_ops; - - if (pxmitpriv->ack_tx) - rtw23a_sctx_done_err(&pack_tx_ops, status); - else - DBG_8723A("%s ack_tx not set\n", __func__); -}
drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_xmit.c:2375 warning: symbol 'rtw_ack_tx_done23a' was not declared. Should it be static? Function 'rtw_ack_tx_done23a' seems to be unused in current staging code. Signed-off-by: Aliaskei Tulia <Aliaksei_Tulia@epam.com> --- drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_xmit.c | 9 --------- 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-) -- 2.1.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html