| Message ID | 1254248019-9572-1-git-send-email-khilman@deeprootsystems.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
"Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com> writes: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:13:39AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Newer revs of da830 silicon report variant 0x8 in JTAG id and >> are not correctly detected. >> >> This patch adds support for the new variant of da830 SoC. >> >> Reported-by: Nick Thompson <Nick.Thompson@gefanuc.com> >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> > > FWIW and if its necessary... > > Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Thanks. Do you know rev name this SoC spin should have? The box that my da830 EVM recently arrived in calls it rev C, but not sure if that's rev C of the board, or rev C of the SoC. > The only thing I don't like is that I/we don't know what else changed on > that part. Hmm, that's not encouraging. Sounds like we need someone from TI to share some info. Kevin
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c index f0b2f96..518c3ff 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c @@ -1145,6 +1145,13 @@ static struct davinci_id da830_ids[] = { .cpu_id = DAVINCI_CPU_ID_DA830, .name = "da830/omap l137", }, + { + .variant = 0x8, + .part_no = 0xb7df, + .manufacturer = 0x017, /* 0x02f >> 1 */ + .cpu_id = DAVINCI_CPU_ID_DA830, + .name = "da830/omap l137 revX", + }, }; static struct davinci_timer_instance da830_timer_instance[2] = {