Message ID | 3cd3c664adb2877317c8f684ee344749b2915e45.1423703861.git.dledford@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Rejected |
Headers | show |
On 02/12/2015 03:43 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: > During the various work I've done on this, some extra locking has crept > in when things weren't working right. This is one of those spots. > Remove the unneeded spinlocks. we need a more concrete/precise text here explaining why these locking spots can be removed. What you wrote is too high level and can not really be used in future debugging/bisection and maintenance, sorry. > The mutex is enough to protect against what we need to protect against. but this is the very same mutex you are removing in a downstream patch of the series, isn't that?! Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_multicast.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_multicast.c index a03b6a04203..424c602d5a0 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_multicast.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_multicast.c @@ -497,12 +497,10 @@ static int ipoib_mcast_join_complete(int status, __ipoib_mcast_continue_join_thread(priv, mcast, 1); } out: - spin_lock_irq(&priv->lock); clear_bit(IPOIB_MCAST_FLAG_BUSY, &mcast->flags); if (status) mcast->mc = NULL; complete(&mcast->done); - spin_unlock_irq(&priv->lock); mutex_unlock(&mcast_mutex); return status;
During the various work I've done on this, some extra locking has crept in when things weren't working right. This is one of those spots. Remove the unneeded spinlocks. The mutex is enough to protect against what we need to protect against. Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_multicast.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)