Message ID | 1423992723-5028-7-git-send-email-wuyun.wu@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Yun, On 15/02/15 09:32, Yun Wu wrote: > There is one more condition that needs to be considered when judging > whether LPI feature is enabled or not, which is whether there is any > ITS available and correctly enabled. > > This patch will fix this by caching ITS enabling status in the GIC > chip data structure. I posted patch for that before [1] and it landed in Marc's tree (irq/gic-fixes). It is not clear from the commit message what the "one more condition" is, but I guess it is the same dts stuff. Do you see issue without your patch applied? [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/314752.html Thanks Vladimir > > Signed-off-by: Yun Wu <wuyun.wu@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > index 1a146cc..e17faca 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data { > u64 redist_stride; > u32 nr_redist_regions; > unsigned int irq_nr; > + int lpi_enabled; > }; > > static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly; > @@ -390,11 +391,6 @@ static void gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(void) > gic_write_grpen1(1); > } > > -static int gic_dist_supports_lpis(void) > -{ > - return !!(readl_relaxed(gic_data.dist_base + GICD_TYPER) & GICD_TYPER_LPIS); > -} > - > static void gic_cpu_init(void) > { > void __iomem *rbase; > @@ -410,7 +406,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(void) > gic_cpu_config(rbase, gic_redist_wait_for_rwp); > > /* Give LPIs a spin */ > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && gic_dist_supports_lpis()) > + if (gic_data.lpi_enabled) > its_cpu_init(); > > /* initialise system registers */ > @@ -629,7 +625,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq, > } > /* LPIs */ > if (hw >= 8192 && hw < GIC_ID_NR) { > - if (!gic_dist_supports_lpis()) > + if (!gic_data.lpi_enabled) > return -EPERM; > irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hw, &gic_chip, d->host_data, > handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL); > @@ -785,8 +781,12 @@ static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *pare > > set_handle_irq(gic_handle_irq); > > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && gic_dist_supports_lpis()) > - its_init(node, &gic_data.rdists, gic_data.domain); > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && > + !!(readl_relaxed(dist_base + GICD_TYPER) & GICD_TYPER_LPIS) && > + !its_init(node, &gic_data.rdists, gic_data.domain)) > + gic_data.lpi_enabled = 1; > + else > + gic_data.lpi_enabled = 0; > > gic_smp_init(); > gic_dist_init(); > -- > 1.8.0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > >
Hi Murzin, On 2015/2/16 18:05, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > Hi Yun, > > On 15/02/15 09:32, Yun Wu wrote: >> There is one more condition that needs to be considered when judging >> whether LPI feature is enabled or not, which is whether there is any >> ITS available and correctly enabled. >> >> This patch will fix this by caching ITS enabling status in the GIC >> chip data structure. > > I posted patch for that before [1] and it landed in Marc's tree > (irq/gic-fixes). It is not clear from the commit message what the "one > more condition" is, but I guess it is the same dts stuff. Do you see > issue without your patch applied? Oh yes, your patch perfectly solved this problem, so this one is no longer needed. And sorry for not noticing your patch. :) Thanks, Abel > > [1] > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/314752.html > > Thanks > Vladimir > >> >> Signed-off-by: Yun Wu <wuyun.wu@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 18 +++++++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c >> index 1a146cc..e17faca 100644 >> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c >> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c >> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data { >> u64 redist_stride; >> u32 nr_redist_regions; >> unsigned int irq_nr; >> + int lpi_enabled; >> }; >> >> static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly; >> @@ -390,11 +391,6 @@ static void gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(void) >> gic_write_grpen1(1); >> } >> >> -static int gic_dist_supports_lpis(void) >> -{ >> - return !!(readl_relaxed(gic_data.dist_base + GICD_TYPER) & GICD_TYPER_LPIS); >> -} >> - >> static void gic_cpu_init(void) >> { >> void __iomem *rbase; >> @@ -410,7 +406,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(void) >> gic_cpu_config(rbase, gic_redist_wait_for_rwp); >> >> /* Give LPIs a spin */ >> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && gic_dist_supports_lpis()) >> + if (gic_data.lpi_enabled) >> its_cpu_init(); >> >> /* initialise system registers */ >> @@ -629,7 +625,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq, >> } >> /* LPIs */ >> if (hw >= 8192 && hw < GIC_ID_NR) { >> - if (!gic_dist_supports_lpis()) >> + if (!gic_data.lpi_enabled) >> return -EPERM; >> irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hw, &gic_chip, d->host_data, >> handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL); >> @@ -785,8 +781,12 @@ static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *pare >> >> set_handle_irq(gic_handle_irq); >> >> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && gic_dist_supports_lpis()) >> - its_init(node, &gic_data.rdists, gic_data.domain); >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && >> + !!(readl_relaxed(dist_base + GICD_TYPER) & GICD_TYPER_LPIS) && >> + !its_init(node, &gic_data.rdists, gic_data.domain)) >> + gic_data.lpi_enabled = 1; >> + else >> + gic_data.lpi_enabled = 0; >> >> gic_smp_init(); >> gic_dist_init(); >> -- >> 1.8.0 >>
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c index 1a146cc..e17faca 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data { u64 redist_stride; u32 nr_redist_regions; unsigned int irq_nr; + int lpi_enabled; }; static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly; @@ -390,11 +391,6 @@ static void gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(void) gic_write_grpen1(1); } -static int gic_dist_supports_lpis(void) -{ - return !!(readl_relaxed(gic_data.dist_base + GICD_TYPER) & GICD_TYPER_LPIS); -} - static void gic_cpu_init(void) { void __iomem *rbase; @@ -410,7 +406,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(void) gic_cpu_config(rbase, gic_redist_wait_for_rwp); /* Give LPIs a spin */ - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && gic_dist_supports_lpis()) + if (gic_data.lpi_enabled) its_cpu_init(); /* initialise system registers */ @@ -629,7 +625,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq, } /* LPIs */ if (hw >= 8192 && hw < GIC_ID_NR) { - if (!gic_dist_supports_lpis()) + if (!gic_data.lpi_enabled) return -EPERM; irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hw, &gic_chip, d->host_data, handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL); @@ -785,8 +781,12 @@ static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *pare set_handle_irq(gic_handle_irq); - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && gic_dist_supports_lpis()) - its_init(node, &gic_data.rdists, gic_data.domain); + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && + !!(readl_relaxed(dist_base + GICD_TYPER) & GICD_TYPER_LPIS) && + !its_init(node, &gic_data.rdists, gic_data.domain)) + gic_data.lpi_enabled = 1; + else + gic_data.lpi_enabled = 0; gic_smp_init(); gic_dist_init();
There is one more condition that needs to be considered when judging whether LPI feature is enabled or not, which is whether there is any ITS available and correctly enabled. This patch will fix this by caching ITS enabling status in the GIC chip data structure. Signed-off-by: Yun Wu <wuyun.wu@huawei.com> --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 1.8.0