Message ID | 1424938344-4017-17-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:12:10PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: > Should pass pci_bus * instead of pci_dev * to pci_domain_nr(). > > Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> > CC: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> > CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> > CC: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org > --- > arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c | 6 +++--- > arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c > index 0640739..2fd7414 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c > +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c > @@ -364,12 +364,12 @@ sn_acpi_get_pcidev_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pcidev_info **pcidev_info, > status = acpi_evaluate_integer(rootbus_handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL, > &segment); > if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) { > - if (segment != pci_domain_nr(dev)) { > + if (segment != pci_domain_nr(dev->bus)) { This is completely unrelated to the series, isn't it? It looks like this is a bug fix that should be handled separately and marked for stable. > acpi_get_name(rootbus_handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, > &name_buffer); > printk(KERN_ERR > "%s: Segment number mismatch, 0x%llx vs 0x%x for: %s\n", > - __func__, segment, pci_domain_nr(dev), > + __func__, segment, pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), > (char *)name_buffer.pointer); > kfree(name_buffer.pointer); > return 1; > @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ sn_acpi_get_pcidev_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pcidev_info **pcidev_info, > /* Build up the pcidev_info.pdi_slot_host_handle */ > host_devfn = get_host_devfn(pcidev_match.handle, rootbus_handle); > (*pcidev_info)->pdi_slot_host_handle = > - ((unsigned long) pci_domain_nr(dev) << 40) | > + ((unsigned long) pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) << 40) | > /* bus == 0 */ > host_devfn; > return 0; > diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c > index bcdc5b8..a97fad4 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c > +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c > @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ sn_io_slot_fixup(struct pci_dev *dev) > panic("%s: Unable to alloc memory for sn_irq_info", __func__); > > /* Call to retrieve pci device information needed by kernel. */ > - status = sal_get_pcidev_info((u64) pci_domain_nr(dev), > + status = sal_get_pcidev_info((u64) pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), > (u64) dev->bus->number, > dev->devfn, > (u64) __pa(pcidev_info), > -- > 1.7.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2015/3/3 10:56, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:12:10PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: >> Should pass pci_bus * instead of pci_dev * to pci_domain_nr(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> >> CC: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> >> CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> >> CC: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org >> --- >> arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c | 6 +++--- >> arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c >> index 0640739..2fd7414 100644 >> --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c >> +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c >> @@ -364,12 +364,12 @@ sn_acpi_get_pcidev_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pcidev_info **pcidev_info, >> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(rootbus_handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL, >> &segment); >> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) { >> - if (segment != pci_domain_nr(dev)) { >> + if (segment != pci_domain_nr(dev->bus)) { > > This is completely unrelated to the series, isn't it? It looks like this > is a bug fix that should be handled separately and marked for stable. Yes, it's a separate patch, I would move it out of this series, and post it out separately. Thanks! Yijing. > >> acpi_get_name(rootbus_handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, >> &name_buffer); >> printk(KERN_ERR >> "%s: Segment number mismatch, 0x%llx vs 0x%x for: %s\n", >> - __func__, segment, pci_domain_nr(dev), >> + __func__, segment, pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), >> (char *)name_buffer.pointer); >> kfree(name_buffer.pointer); >> return 1; >> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ sn_acpi_get_pcidev_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pcidev_info **pcidev_info, >> /* Build up the pcidev_info.pdi_slot_host_handle */ >> host_devfn = get_host_devfn(pcidev_match.handle, rootbus_handle); >> (*pcidev_info)->pdi_slot_host_handle = >> - ((unsigned long) pci_domain_nr(dev) << 40) | >> + ((unsigned long) pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) << 40) | >> /* bus == 0 */ >> host_devfn; >> return 0; >> diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c >> index bcdc5b8..a97fad4 100644 >> --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c >> +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c >> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ sn_io_slot_fixup(struct pci_dev *dev) >> panic("%s: Unable to alloc memory for sn_irq_info", __func__); >> >> /* Call to retrieve pci device information needed by kernel. */ >> - status = sal_get_pcidev_info((u64) pci_domain_nr(dev), >> + status = sal_get_pcidev_info((u64) pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), >> (u64) dev->bus->number, >> dev->devfn, >> (u64) __pa(pcidev_info), >> -- >> 1.7.1 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > . >
diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c index 0640739..2fd7414 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c @@ -364,12 +364,12 @@ sn_acpi_get_pcidev_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pcidev_info **pcidev_info, status = acpi_evaluate_integer(rootbus_handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL, &segment); if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) { - if (segment != pci_domain_nr(dev)) { + if (segment != pci_domain_nr(dev->bus)) { acpi_get_name(rootbus_handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &name_buffer); printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Segment number mismatch, 0x%llx vs 0x%x for: %s\n", - __func__, segment, pci_domain_nr(dev), + __func__, segment, pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), (char *)name_buffer.pointer); kfree(name_buffer.pointer); return 1; @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ sn_acpi_get_pcidev_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pcidev_info **pcidev_info, /* Build up the pcidev_info.pdi_slot_host_handle */ host_devfn = get_host_devfn(pcidev_match.handle, rootbus_handle); (*pcidev_info)->pdi_slot_host_handle = - ((unsigned long) pci_domain_nr(dev) << 40) | + ((unsigned long) pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) << 40) | /* bus == 0 */ host_devfn; return 0; diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c index bcdc5b8..a97fad4 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ sn_io_slot_fixup(struct pci_dev *dev) panic("%s: Unable to alloc memory for sn_irq_info", __func__); /* Call to retrieve pci device information needed by kernel. */ - status = sal_get_pcidev_info((u64) pci_domain_nr(dev), + status = sal_get_pcidev_info((u64) pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), (u64) dev->bus->number, dev->devfn, (u64) __pa(pcidev_info),
Should pass pci_bus * instead of pci_dev * to pci_domain_nr(). Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> CC: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> CC: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org --- arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c | 6 +++--- arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)