| Message ID | 1428499339-29569-5-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:22:15PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Replace duplicated const keyword for 'emc_parent_clk_names' with proper > array of const pointers to const strings. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) This would probably better go in via the Tegra tree since the patch that contains this has only made it to linux-next. Stephen, Mike, any objections to me taking this? Thierry > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c > index 615da43a508d..637798c3cc59 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ > #define CLK_SOURCE_EMC_EMC_2X_CLK_SRC(x) (((x) & CLK_SOURCE_EMC_EMC_2X_CLK_SRC_MASK) << \ > CLK_SOURCE_EMC_EMC_2X_CLK_SRC_SHIFT) > > -static const char const *emc_parent_clk_names[] = { > +static const char * const emc_parent_clk_names[] = { > "pll_m", "pll_c", "pll_p", "clk_m", "pll_m_ud", > "pll_c2", "pll_c3", "pll_c_ud" > }; > -- > 1.9.1 >
2015-04-09 12:00 GMT+02:00 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:22:15PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Replace duplicated const keyword for 'emc_parent_clk_names' with proper >> array of const pointers to const strings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > This would probably better go in via the Tegra tree since the patch that > contains this has only made it to linux-next. > > Stephen, Mike, any objections to me taking this? Applying this without the change for const-ness of parent_names (patch by Sascha Hauer sent before mine [1]) would introduce a warning - assign of const to non-const. Any idea to solve it? Immutable branch? [1] http://marc.info/?i=1427825817-26773-2-git-send-email-s.hauer%40pengutronix.de Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:07:59PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > 2015-04-09 12:00 GMT+02:00 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>: > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:22:15PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> Replace duplicated const keyword for 'emc_parent_clk_names' with proper > >> array of const pointers to const strings. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > This would probably better go in via the Tegra tree since the patch that > > contains this has only made it to linux-next. > > > > Stephen, Mike, any objections to me taking this? > > Applying this without the change for const-ness of parent_names (patch > by Sascha Hauer sent before mine [1]) would introduce a warning - > assign of const to non-const. Any idea to solve it? Immutable branch? Right, I had missed that. Immutable branch would work, though perhaps it'd be easier to just defer this until after v4.1-rc1. The warning shouldn't happen if we leave out this single patch and apply it later on, right? Alternatively the whole series could be deferred until after v4.1-rc1. Thierry
2015-04-09 12:19 GMT+02:00 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>: > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:07:59PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> 2015-04-09 12:00 GMT+02:00 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>: >> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:22:15PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> >> Replace duplicated const keyword for 'emc_parent_clk_names' with proper >> >> array of const pointers to const strings. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> >> >> --- >> >> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c | 2 +- >> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > This would probably better go in via the Tegra tree since the patch that >> > contains this has only made it to linux-next. >> > >> > Stephen, Mike, any objections to me taking this? >> >> Applying this without the change for const-ness of parent_names (patch >> by Sascha Hauer sent before mine [1]) would introduce a warning - >> assign of const to non-const. Any idea to solve it? Immutable branch? > > Right, I had missed that. Immutable branch would work, though perhaps > it'd be easier to just defer this until after v4.1-rc1. The warning > shouldn't happen if we leave out this single patch and apply it later > on, right? That would be fine with me. I think it would better to apply patches now if they are applicable. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 04/09, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:07:59PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > 2015-04-09 12:00 GMT+02:00 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>: > > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:22:15PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > >> Replace duplicated const keyword for 'emc_parent_clk_names' with proper > > >> array of const pointers to const strings. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> > > >> --- > > >> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c | 2 +- > > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > This would probably better go in via the Tegra tree since the patch that > > > contains this has only made it to linux-next. > > > > > > Stephen, Mike, any objections to me taking this? > > > > Applying this without the change for const-ness of parent_names (patch > > by Sascha Hauer sent before mine [1]) would introduce a warning - > > assign of const to non-const. Any idea to solve it? Immutable branch? > > Right, I had missed that. Immutable branch would work, though perhaps > it'd be easier to just defer this until after v4.1-rc1. The warning > shouldn't happen if we leave out this single patch and apply it later > on, right? > > Alternatively the whole series could be deferred until after v4.1-rc1. > Yeah I don't really care to make an immutable branch for this cleanup series. If everyone is ok with waiting until after -rc1 we can apply the Tegra patch then (or you can and we'll get it through a pull later). We should be able to apply the parts that go through clk tree though.
diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c index 615da43a508d..637798c3cc59 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ #define CLK_SOURCE_EMC_EMC_2X_CLK_SRC(x) (((x) & CLK_SOURCE_EMC_EMC_2X_CLK_SRC_MASK) << \ CLK_SOURCE_EMC_EMC_2X_CLK_SRC_SHIFT) -static const char const *emc_parent_clk_names[] = { +static const char * const emc_parent_clk_names[] = { "pll_m", "pll_c", "pll_p", "clk_m", "pll_m_ud", "pll_c2", "pll_c3", "pll_c_ud" };
Replace duplicated const keyword for 'emc_parent_clk_names' with proper array of const pointers to const strings. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> --- drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)