Message ID | 1431051856-22476-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | ff9174d57a8239c5a21d2a0c7e00dddd54953f6c |
Headers | show |
Fabio Estevam wrote: > The comment and the call to of_device_is_available() are not really > needed. > > It is the expected behaviour to probe only the ssi nodes that are > enabled in the device tree. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam<fabio.estevam@freescale.com> Acked-by: Timur Tabi <timur@tabi.org>
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 11:24:16PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> > > The comment and the call to of_device_is_available() are not really > needed. Applied, thanks.
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c index 0d48804..c7647e0 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c @@ -1292,13 +1292,6 @@ static int fsl_ssi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) void __iomem *iomem; char name[64]; - /* SSIs that are not connected on the board should have a - * status = "disabled" - * property in their device tree nodes. - */ - if (!of_device_is_available(np)) - return -ENODEV; - of_id = of_match_device(fsl_ssi_ids, &pdev->dev); if (!of_id || !of_id->data) return -EINVAL;