diff mbox

[v1,2/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: fix compilation warning if compiled as a module

Message ID 1432043231-31102-3-git-send-email-ygardi@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Yaniv Gardi May 19, 2015, 1:47 p.m. UTC
This change fixes a compilation warning that happens if SCSI_UFS_QCOM
is compiled as a module.

Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@codeaurora.org>

---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Paul Bolle May 20, 2015, 8:29 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 16:47 +0300, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ out:
>  
>  #define	ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX	30
>  static char android_boot_dev[ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX];
> -static int get_android_boot_dev(char *str)
> +static int __maybe_unused get_android_boot_dev(char *str)
>  {
>  	strlcpy(android_boot_dev, str, ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX);
>  	return 1;

Wouldn't it be clearer to wrap these few lines (until after the
__setup() macro) with #ifndef MODULE?

And I think get_android_boot_dev() could be marked __init. Because if
it's built-in it will never be called after the kernel has finished
booting, right?


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Yaniv Gardi May 20, 2015, 1:49 p.m. UTC | #2
> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 16:47 +0300, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
>> @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ out:
>>
>>  #define	ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX	30
>>  static char android_boot_dev[ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX];
>> -static int get_android_boot_dev(char *str)
>> +static int __maybe_unused get_android_boot_dev(char *str)
>>  {
>>  	strlcpy(android_boot_dev, str, ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX);
>>  	return 1;
>
> Wouldn't it be clearer to wrap these few lines (until after the
> __setup() macro) with #ifndef MODULE?
>
> And I think get_android_boot_dev() could be marked __init. Because if
> it's built-in it will never be called after the kernel has finished
> booting, right?
>

That's correct. I will upload an update to this patch.
I accept both comments
#ifndef MODULE is indeed clearer
and __init flag as well, since get_android_boot_dev() will not be called
again after booting finished.

>
> Paul Bolle
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
index 6652a81..2e4ad21 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@  out:
 
 #define	ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX	30
 static char android_boot_dev[ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX];
-static int get_android_boot_dev(char *str)
+static int __maybe_unused get_android_boot_dev(char *str)
 {
 	strlcpy(android_boot_dev, str, ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX);
 	return 1;