Message ID | CAHp75VeoCQSUCeswTCzUyKbV_e4RTt5t0yjEJLSzAvtX8jFvNw@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Delegated to: | Herbert Xu |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 03:21:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com> wrote: > > Building with the attached random configuration file, > > Hit the very same error against next-20150605. > > The issue with that file we have no compiler optimization enabled. So, > guys, how you would recommend to fix it? Stephan, can we get rid of the no optimisation requirement? Thanks,
Adding Stephan to Cc. On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 20:25 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 03:21:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Building with the attached random configuration file, > > > > Hit the very same error against next-20150605. > > > > The issue with that file we have no compiler optimization enabled. So, > > guys, how you would recommend to fix it? > > Stephan, can we get rid of the no optimisation requirement? Would something like #pragma GCC push_options #pragma GCC optimize ("-O0") static __u64 jent_fold_time(struct rand_data *ec, __u64 time, __u64 *folded, __u64 loop_cnt) { ... } #pragma GCC pop_options Be an option to allow the file to be compiled with regular optimizations enabled? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Am Montag, 8. Juni 2015, 14:36:30 schrieb Peter Zijlstra: Hi Peter, > Adding Stephan to Cc. > > On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 20:25 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 03:21:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Building with the attached random configuration file, > > > > > > Hit the very same error against next-20150605. > > > > > > The issue with that file we have no compiler optimization enabled. So, > > > guys, how you would recommend to fix it? > > > > Stephan, can we get rid of the no optimisation requirement? > > Would something like > > #pragma GCC push_options > #pragma GCC optimize ("-O0") > static __u64 jent_fold_time(struct rand_data *ec, __u64 time, > __u64 *folded, __u64 loop_cnt) > { > ... > } > #pragma GCC pop_options > > Be an option to allow the file to be compiled with regular optimizations > enabled? Yes, that is also possible. I was not aware of the fact that the optimization is the problem. I got another report fom Fengguang Wu about a compile issue on AVR32 which I found out relates to the same issue. I will prepare a patch shortly.
Am Monday 08 June 2015, 14:36:30 schrieb Peter Zijlstra: Hi Peter, > >Would something like > >#pragma GCC push_options >#pragma GCC optimize ("-O0") >static __u64 jent_fold_time(struct rand_data *ec, __u64 time, > __u64 *folded, __u64 loop_cnt) >{ > ... >} >#pragma GCC pop_options > >Be an option to allow the file to be compiled with regular optimizations >enabled? After doing some tests, I see that neither the min entropy nor the Shannon Entropy of the raw noise is affected by using the mentioned pragmas at the right locations. So I will prepare a patch tonight. Just for my edification: why does an -O0 on a self contained file break the compile run? Any why do the pragmas work? Thanks Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 17:52 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: > Am Monday 08 June 2015, 14:36:30 schrieb Peter Zijlstra: > > Hi Peter, > > > >Would something like > > > >#pragma GCC push_options > >#pragma GCC optimize ("-O0") > >static __u64 jent_fold_time(struct rand_data *ec, __u64 time, > > __u64 *folded, __u64 loop_cnt) > >{ > > ... > >} > >#pragma GCC pop_options > > > >Be an option to allow the file to be compiled with regular optimizations > >enabled? > > After doing some tests, I see that neither the min entropy nor the Shannon > Entropy of the raw noise is affected by using the mentioned pragmas at the > right locations. > > So I will prepare a patch tonight. > > Just for my edification: why does an -O0 on a self contained file break the > compile run? We rely on -finline-functions, which is disabled with -O0. By inlining some things, the compiler can do constant value propagation etc. and compile time evaluate things. We often (as is the case here) use this to generate compiler warns without generating actual code. > Any why do the pragmas work? They are placed such that the code affected by the above creativity is outside of the forced -O0 compile and life is good again. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 03:21:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com> wrote: > > Building with the attached random configuration file, > > Hit the very same error against next-20150605. > There are also several failing default configurations. Guenter --- um:defconfig: include/asm-generic/fixmap.h: In function 'fix_to_virt': include/asm-generic/fixmap.h:31:2: error: size of unnamed array is negative --- x86_64:defconfig: i386:defconfig: ./arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h: In function 'native_queued_spin_unlock': ./arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:17:2: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_17' declared with attribute error: Need native word sized stores/loads for atomicity. --- openrisc:defconfig: In file included from ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/timex.h:23:0, ... from crypto/jitterentropy.c:52: ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/spr.h: In function 'jent_loop_shuffle': ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/spr.h:30:2: warning: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/spr.h:30:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' --- nios2:3c120_defconfig: ERROR: "get_cycles" [crypto/jitterentropy.ko] undefined! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Am Monday 08 June 2015, 12:54:12 schrieb Guenter Roeck: Hi Guenter, Thanks for the note. ... > >--- > >openrisc:defconfig: > >In file included from ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/timex.h:23:0, > ... > from crypto/jitterentropy.c:52: >./arch/openrisc/include/asm/spr.h: In function 'jent_loop_shuffle': >./arch/openrisc/include/asm/spr.h:30:2: warning: asm operand 1 probably >doesn't match constraints >./arch/openrisc/include/asm/spr.h:30:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' I received this one also before. But that seems to be an error on the OpenRISC platform as the random_get_entropy() function or the get_cycles function is not implemented as defined. The crypto code uses the following which triggers the issue: __u64 tmp = 0; tmp = random_get_entropy(); That one seems to be an appropriate use of random_get_entropy() which on almost all arches is an alias for get_cycles(). > >--- > >nios2:3c120_defconfig: > >ERROR: "get_cycles" [crypto/jitterentropy.ko] undefined! Ciao Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig b/arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig index 315b861..363824f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig +++ b/arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig @@ -172,9 +172,11 @@ CONFIG_TIGON3=y CONFIG_NET_TULIP=y CONFIG_E100=y CONFIG_E1000=y +CONFIG_E1000E=y CONFIG_SKY2=y CONFIG_FORCEDETH=y CONFIG_8139TOO=y +CONFIG_R8169=y CONFIG_FDDI=y CONFIG_INPUT_POLLDEV=y # CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_PSAUX is not set @@ -198,7 +200,7 @@ CONFIG_HW_RANDOM=y # CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_INTEL is not set # CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_AMD is not set CONFIG_NVRAM=y -CONFIG_HPET=y +# CONFIG_HPET is not set # CONFIG_HPET_MMAP is not set CONFIG_I2C_I801=y CONFIG_WATCHDOG=y @@ -206,8 +208,8 @@ CONFIG_AGP=y CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=y CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=y CONFIG_DRM=y -CONFIG_DRM_I915=y -CONFIG_DRM_I915_KMS=y +# CONFIG_DRM_I915 is not set +CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_LCD_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS=y CONFIG_FB_TILEBLITTING=y CONFIG_FB_EFI=y @@ -224,8 +226,8 @@ CONFIG_SND_MIXER_OSS=y CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS=y CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER_OSS=y CONFIG_SND_HRTIMER=y -CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL=y -CONFIG_SND_HDA_HWDEP=y +# CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL is not set +# CONFIG_SND_HDA_HWDEP is not set CONFIG_HIDRAW=y CONFIG_HID_GYRATION=y CONFIG_LOGITECH_FF=y @@ -307,3 +309,56 @@ CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX=y CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM=y CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE=y # CONFIG_CRYPTO_ANSI_CPRNG is not set +CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER=y +CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_PCI=y +CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=m +CONFIG_GPIOLIB=y +CONFIG_GPIO_INTEL_MID=y +CONFIG_INTEL_MID_WATCHDOG=y +CONFIG_NOP_USB_XCEIV=y +CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA=y +CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA_UDC=y +CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA_HOST=y +CONFIG_X86_EXTENDED_PLATFORM=y +CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID=y +CONFIG_EFI_STUB=y +CONFIG_EFI_MIXED=y +CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK_EFI=y +CONFIG_FB=y +CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y +CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y +CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y +CONFIG_USB_DWC3=y +CONFIG_USB_DWC3_GADGET=y +CONFIG_USB_SERIAL=y +CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_PL2303=y +CONFIG_USB_USBNET=y +CONFIG_USB_NET_AX88179_178A=y +CONFIG_USB_NET_MCS7830=y +CONFIG_USB_NET_AX8817X=y +CONFIG_X86_INTEL_LPSS=y +CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME=y +CONFIG_DW_DMAC_CORE=m +CONFIG_DW_DMAC=m +CONFIG_DW_DMAC_PCI=m +CONFIG_DMATEST=m +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_DMA=y +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PCI=y +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_DW=m +CONFIG_MMC=m +CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI=m +CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ACPI=m +CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y +CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=y +CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG=y +CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y +CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ=y +CONFIG_PINCTRL=y +CONFIG_PINCTRL_BAYTRAIL=y +CONFIG_PWM=y +CONFIG_PWM_LPSS=m +CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PCI=m +CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PLATFORM=m +CONFIG_SPI=y +CONFIG_SPI_PXA2XX_PCI=m +CONFIG_SPI_PXA2XX=m