| Message ID | 1435738921-25027-6-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > When requested by a user, the PWM is assigned a default period and polarity > extracted from the DT, the platform data or statically set by the driver. > Those default values are currently stored in the period and polarity > fields of the pwm_device struct, but they will be stored somewhere else > once we have introduced the architecture allowing for hardware state > retrieval. > > The pwm_set_default_polarity and pwm_set_default_period should only be > used by PWM drivers or the PWM core infrastructure to specify the > default period and polarity values. Would it make sense to put the prototypes of pwm_set_default_p{olarity,eriod} into (say) drivers/pwm/pwm-private.h then? Best regards Uwe
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:44:45 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > When requested by a user, the PWM is assigned a default period and polarity > > extracted from the DT, the platform data or statically set by the driver. > > Those default values are currently stored in the period and polarity > > fields of the pwm_device struct, but they will be stored somewhere else > > once we have introduced the architecture allowing for hardware state > > retrieval. > > > > The pwm_set_default_polarity and pwm_set_default_period should only be > > used by PWM drivers or the PWM core infrastructure to specify the > > default period and polarity values. > Would it make sense to put the prototypes of > pwm_set_default_p{olarity,eriod} into (say) drivers/pwm/pwm-private.h > then? > Yes, definitely. I was thinking about moving those functions/prototypes into include/linux/pwm-provider.h, but I'm fine with drivers/pwm/pwm-private.h too. Thierry, any opinion ?
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:49:55AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:44:45 +0200 > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > When requested by a user, the PWM is assigned a default period and polarity > > > extracted from the DT, the platform data or statically set by the driver. > > > Those default values are currently stored in the period and polarity > > > fields of the pwm_device struct, but they will be stored somewhere else > > > once we have introduced the architecture allowing for hardware state > > > retrieval. > > > > > > The pwm_set_default_polarity and pwm_set_default_period should only be > > > used by PWM drivers or the PWM core infrastructure to specify the > > > default period and polarity values. > > Would it make sense to put the prototypes of > > pwm_set_default_p{olarity,eriod} into (say) drivers/pwm/pwm-private.h > > then? > > > > Yes, definitely. I was thinking about moving those functions/prototypes > into include/linux/pwm-provider.h, but I'm fine with > drivers/pwm/pwm-private.h too. > > Thierry, any opinion ? I'm not sure I see the need for this. If they are the default values and drivers have no need to change them, then storing them in the regular period and polarity fields seems just fine (they'll be propagated into new state objects as they get created). And if the driver has a need to change them, then why would it ever care about the default values? Thierry
Hi Thierry, On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:03:14 +0200 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:49:55AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:44:45 +0200 > > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > When requested by a user, the PWM is assigned a default period and polarity > > > > extracted from the DT, the platform data or statically set by the driver. > > > > Those default values are currently stored in the period and polarity > > > > fields of the pwm_device struct, but they will be stored somewhere else > > > > once we have introduced the architecture allowing for hardware state > > > > retrieval. > > > > > > > > The pwm_set_default_polarity and pwm_set_default_period should only be > > > > used by PWM drivers or the PWM core infrastructure to specify the > > > > default period and polarity values. > > > Would it make sense to put the prototypes of > > > pwm_set_default_p{olarity,eriod} into (say) drivers/pwm/pwm-private.h > > > then? > > > > > > > Yes, definitely. I was thinking about moving those functions/prototypes > > into include/linux/pwm-provider.h, but I'm fine with > > drivers/pwm/pwm-private.h too. > > > > Thierry, any opinion ? > > I'm not sure I see the need for this. If they are the default values and > drivers have no need to change them, then storing them in the regular > period and polarity fields seems just fine (they'll be propagated into > new state objects as they get created). > > And if the driver has a need to change them, then why would it ever care > about the default values? Because the period is often directly extracted from the DT, and this extracted period may not match the one configured by the bootloader. If the driver wants to display the current status without changing the PWM state, then the driver will use the current state. ITOH, if it has to apply a new config, the driver will use the default period value (extracted from the DT) and change the duty-cycle depending on its needs. This is the case we have with the pwm-regulator driver: we want to display the initial voltage value without changing the PWM config, and when someone decides to change the voltage, we want to use the default period instead of keeping the one configured by the bootloader. Best Regards, Boris
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:14:43AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:03:14 +0200 > Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:49:55AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:44:45 +0200 > > > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > When requested by a user, the PWM is assigned a default period and polarity > > > > > extracted from the DT, the platform data or statically set by the driver. > > > > > Those default values are currently stored in the period and polarity > > > > > fields of the pwm_device struct, but they will be stored somewhere else > > > > > once we have introduced the architecture allowing for hardware state > > > > > retrieval. > > > > > > > > > > The pwm_set_default_polarity and pwm_set_default_period should only be > > > > > used by PWM drivers or the PWM core infrastructure to specify the > > > > > default period and polarity values. > > > > Would it make sense to put the prototypes of > > > > pwm_set_default_p{olarity,eriod} into (say) drivers/pwm/pwm-private.h > > > > then? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, definitely. I was thinking about moving those functions/prototypes > > > into include/linux/pwm-provider.h, but I'm fine with > > > drivers/pwm/pwm-private.h too. > > > > > > Thierry, any opinion ? > > > > I'm not sure I see the need for this. If they are the default values and > > drivers have no need to change them, then storing them in the regular > > period and polarity fields seems just fine (they'll be propagated into > > new state objects as they get created). > > > > And if the driver has a need to change them, then why would it ever care > > about the default values? > > Because the period is often directly extracted from the DT, and this > extracted period may not match the one configured by the bootloader. > > If the driver wants to display the current status without changing the > PWM state, then the driver will use the current state. ITOH, if it > has to apply a new config, the driver will use the default period > value (extracted from the DT) and change the duty-cycle depending on its > needs. > This is the case we have with the pwm-regulator driver: we want to > display the initial voltage value without changing the PWM config, and > when someone decides to change the voltage, we want to use the default > period instead of keeping the one configured by the bootloader. Wouldn't it make more sense to postpone this until the introduction of the default state, then? That way we'd be getting a more consistent way of dealing with default vs. initial by looking only at state objects. Ideally initial state should be the same as the default state. Except maybe for the duty-cycle, which won't be encoded in the default state anyway. Thierry
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:22:42 +0200 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:14:43AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Hi Thierry, > > > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:03:14 +0200 > > Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:49:55AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:44:45 +0200 > > > > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > > When requested by a user, the PWM is assigned a default period and polarity > > > > > > extracted from the DT, the platform data or statically set by the driver. > > > > > > Those default values are currently stored in the period and polarity > > > > > > fields of the pwm_device struct, but they will be stored somewhere else > > > > > > once we have introduced the architecture allowing for hardware state > > > > > > retrieval. > > > > > > > > > > > > The pwm_set_default_polarity and pwm_set_default_period should only be > > > > > > used by PWM drivers or the PWM core infrastructure to specify the > > > > > > default period and polarity values. > > > > > Would it make sense to put the prototypes of > > > > > pwm_set_default_p{olarity,eriod} into (say) drivers/pwm/pwm-private.h > > > > > then? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, definitely. I was thinking about moving those functions/prototypes > > > > into include/linux/pwm-provider.h, but I'm fine with > > > > drivers/pwm/pwm-private.h too. > > > > > > > > Thierry, any opinion ? > > > > > > I'm not sure I see the need for this. If they are the default values and > > > drivers have no need to change them, then storing them in the regular > > > period and polarity fields seems just fine (they'll be propagated into > > > new state objects as they get created). > > > > > > And if the driver has a need to change them, then why would it ever care > > > about the default values? > > > > Because the period is often directly extracted from the DT, and this > > extracted period may not match the one configured by the bootloader. > > > > If the driver wants to display the current status without changing the > > PWM state, then the driver will use the current state. ITOH, if it > > has to apply a new config, the driver will use the default period > > value (extracted from the DT) and change the duty-cycle depending on its > > needs. > > This is the case we have with the pwm-regulator driver: we want to > > display the initial voltage value without changing the PWM config, and > > when someone decides to change the voltage, we want to use the default > > period instead of keeping the one configured by the bootloader. > > Wouldn't it make more sense to postpone this until the introduction of > the default state, then? That way we'd be getting a more consistent way > of dealing with default vs. initial by looking only at state objects. Hm, I was trying to keep the series bisectable. If we do that after introducing the default state concept, then some drivers will retrieve invalid values until the patches introducing the default helpers and changing the different drivers to call the default helpers where appropriate are introduced. > > Ideally initial state should be the same as the default state. Except > maybe for the duty-cycle, which won't be encoded in the default state > anyway. Yes, but we don't live in an ideal world ;-), and the value set in an old bootloaders might be considered wrong at some point, and new dts versions might decide to change a bit the period value.
diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c index 1d07e3e..2c564d1 100644 --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, if (led_data->can_sleep) INIT_WORK(&led_data->work, led_pwm_work); - led_data->period = pwm_get_period(led_data->pwm); + led_data->period = pwm_get_default_period(led_data->pwm); if (!led_data->period && (led->pwm_period_ns > 0)) led_data->period = led->pwm_period_ns; diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c index f7c11d2..7ffad2b 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/core.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c @@ -146,12 +146,12 @@ of_pwm_xlate_with_flags(struct pwm_chip *pc, const struct of_phandle_args *args) if (IS_ERR(pwm)) return pwm; - pwm_set_period(pwm, args->args[1]); + pwm_set_default_period(pwm, args->args[1]); if (args->args[2] & PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED) - pwm_set_polarity(pwm, PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED); + pwm_set_default_polarity(pwm, PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED); else - pwm_set_polarity(pwm, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL); + pwm_set_default_polarity(pwm, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL); return pwm; } @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ of_pwm_simple_xlate(struct pwm_chip *pc, const struct of_phandle_args *args) if (IS_ERR(pwm)) return pwm; - pwm_set_period(pwm, args->args[1]); + pwm_set_default_period(pwm, args->args[1]); return pwm; } @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ int pwmchip_add_with_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip, pwm->chip = chip; pwm->pwm = chip->base + i; pwm->hwpwm = i; - pwm->polarity = polarity; + pwm_set_default_polarity(pwm, polarity); radix_tree_insert(&pwm_tree, pwm->pwm, pwm); } @@ -704,8 +704,8 @@ struct pwm_device *pwm_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id) if (IS_ERR(pwm)) goto out; - pwm_set_period(pwm, chosen->period); - pwm_set_polarity(pwm, chosen->polarity); + pwm_set_default_period(pwm, chosen->period); + pwm_set_default_polarity(pwm, chosen->polarity); out: mutex_unlock(&pwm_lookup_lock); diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c index cb2f702..65b80aa 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ pxa_pwm_of_xlate(struct pwm_chip *pc, const struct of_phandle_args *args) if (IS_ERR(pwm)) return pwm; - pwm_set_period(pwm, args->args[0]); + pwm_set_default_period(pwm, args->args[0]); return pwm; } diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c index cd9dde5..a364fb7 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c @@ -333,7 +333,8 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) val = sun4i_pwm_readl(pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG); for (i = 0; i < pwm->chip.npwm; i++) if (!(val & BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, i))) - pwm->chip.pwms[i].polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED; + pwm_set_default_polarity(&pwm->chip.pwms[i], + PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED); clk_disable_unprepare(pwm->clk); return 0; diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c index ffa9612..12b4d9d 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static int pwm_regulator_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int dutycycle; int ret; - pwm_reg_period = pwm_get_period(drvdata->pwm); + pwm_reg_period = pwm_get_default_period(drvdata->pwm); dutycycle = (pwm_reg_period * drvdata->duty_cycle_table[selector].dutycycle) / 100; diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c index 35fe482..449ebc3 100644 --- a/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static int lm3630a_intr_config(struct lm3630a_chip *pchip) static void lm3630a_pwm_ctrl(struct lm3630a_chip *pchip, int br, int br_max) { - unsigned int period = pwm_get_period(pchip->pwmd); + unsigned int period = pwm_get_default_period(pchip->pwmd); unsigned int duty = br * period / br_max; pwm_config(pchip->pwmd, duty, period); @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static int lm3630a_probe(struct i2c_client *client, return PTR_ERR(pchip->pwmd); } } - pchip->pwmd->period = pdata->pwm_period; + pwm_set_default_period(pchip->pwmd, pdata->pwm_period); /* interrupt enable : irq 0 is not allowed */ pchip->irq = client->irq; diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c index eff379b..ae498c1 100644 --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) * set the period from platform data if it has not already been set * via the PWM lookup table. */ - pb->period = pwm_get_period(pb->pwm); + pb->period = pwm_get_default_period(pb->pwm); if (!pb->period && (data->pwm_period_ns > 0)) { pb->period = data->pwm_period_ns; pwm_set_period(pb->pwm, data->pwm_period_ns); diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c index 3e153c0..6949626 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static int ssd1307fb_init(struct ssd1307fb_par *par) return PTR_ERR(par->pwm); } - par->pwm_period = pwm_get_period(par->pwm); + par->pwm_period = pwm_get_default_period(par->pwm); /* Enable the PWM */ pwm_config(par->pwm, par->pwm_period / 2, par->pwm_period); pwm_enable(par->pwm); diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h index 6f286df..72a21d5 100644 --- a/include/linux/pwm.h +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h @@ -103,11 +103,21 @@ static inline void pwm_set_period(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int period) pwm->period = period; } +static inline void pwm_set_default_period(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int period) +{ + pwm_set_period(pwm, period); +} + static inline unsigned int pwm_get_period(const struct pwm_device *pwm) { return pwm ? pwm->period : 0; } +static inline unsigned int pwm_get_default_period(const struct pwm_device *pwm) +{ + return pwm_get_period(pwm); +} + static inline void pwm_set_duty_cycle(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int duty) { if (pwm) @@ -124,6 +134,11 @@ static inline unsigned int pwm_get_duty_cycle(const struct pwm_device *pwm) */ int pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_device *pwm, enum pwm_polarity polarity); +static inline void pwm_set_default_polarity(struct pwm_device *pwm, enum pwm_polarity polarity) +{ + pwm_set_polarity(pwm, polarity); +} + static inline enum pwm_polarity pwm_get_polarity(const struct pwm_device *pwm) { return pwm ? pwm->polarity : PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
When requested by a user, the PWM is assigned a default period and polarity extracted from the DT, the platform data or statically set by the driver. Those default values are currently stored in the period and polarity fields of the pwm_device struct, but they will be stored somewhere else once we have introduced the architecture allowing for hardware state retrieval. The pwm_set_default_polarity and pwm_set_default_period should only be used by PWM drivers or the PWM core infrastructure to specify the default period and polarity values. PWM users might call the pwm_get_default_period to query the default period value. There is currently no helper to query the default polarity, but it might be added later on if there is a need for it. This patch also modifies all the places where the default helpers should be used in place of the standard ones. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> --- drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 2 +- drivers/pwm/core.c | 14 +++++++------- drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c | 2 +- drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 3 ++- drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 2 +- drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c | 4 ++-- drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 2 +- drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 2 +- include/linux/pwm.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ 9 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)