Message ID | 1436445692-10656-4-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 06:11:32PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > This patch adds dev_info line at the end of probe function, to > clearly put status of regulator probe on console. Useful during > development, specially to check bootlog. > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator registered ...\n"); > return 0; No, this is pure noise - all you're doing is slowing down boot for users with no content. Think about what would happen if every driver did this. The core already displays the constraints when things are registered.
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:11:32 +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath said: > This patch adds dev_info line at the end of probe function, to > clearly put status of regulator probe on console. Useful during > development, specially to check bootlog. I can see that as a development thing... > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator registered ...\n"); In which case this should be 'dev_debug()' or similar so it doesn't clutter up and slow down a production boot.
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:36:54PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:11:32 +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath said: > > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator registered ...\n"); > In which case this should be 'dev_debug()' or similar so it doesn't > clutter up and slow down a production boot. It's not adding anything, there's plenty of debug messages you can turn on in the core for things like device enumeration.
On Friday 10 July 2015 12:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 06:11:32PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >> This patch adds dev_info line at the end of probe function, to >> clearly put status of regulator probe on console. Useful during >> development, specially to check bootlog. > >> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator registered ...\n"); >> return 0; > > No, this is pure noise - all you're doing is slowing down boot for users > with no content. Think about what would happen if every driver did > this. The core already displays the constraints when things are > registered. > I was just trying my luck here :) And honestly, this was useful for me atleast. Thanks, Vaibhav
On Friday 10 July 2015 01:06 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:11:32 +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath said: >> This patch adds dev_info line at the end of probe function, to >> clearly put status of regulator probe on console. Useful during >> development, specially to check bootlog. > > I can see that as a development thing... > >> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator registered ...\n"); > > In which case this should be 'dev_debug()' or similar so it doesn't > clutter up and slow down a production boot. > Yeup, Probably dev_debug would have been better here. Thanks, Vaibhav
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c b/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c index fdebd23..ee4b370 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static int pm800_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } } + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator registered ...\n"); return 0; }
This patch adds dev_info line at the end of probe function, to clearly put status of regulator probe on console. Useful during development, specially to check bootlog. Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> --- drivers/regulator/88pm800.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)