Message ID | 1436293469-25707-4-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | RFC |
Headers | show |
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 19:23 +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> > > To enable the parsing of clock frequency and cpu efficiency values > inside parse_dt_topology [arch/arm/kernel/topology.c] to scale the > relative capacity of the cpus, this property has to be provided within > the cpu nodes of the dts file. > > The patch is a copy of commit 8f15973ef8c3 ("ARM: vexpress: Add CPU > clock-frequencies to TC2 device-tree") taken from Linaro Stable Kernel > (LSK) massaged into mainline. Not sure you really need to mention commit hashes from outside of the mainline Linux tree and the values I added to that commit were probably copied from some patch originating from ARM or elsewhere anyway. So the second paragraph is this commit message is probably superfluous. But this is nitpicking I guess :-)
Hi Tixy, On 08/07/15 13:36, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 19:23 +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote: >> From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> >> >> To enable the parsing of clock frequency and cpu efficiency values >> inside parse_dt_topology [arch/arm/kernel/topology.c] to scale the >> relative capacity of the cpus, this property has to be provided within >> the cpu nodes of the dts file. >> >> The patch is a copy of commit 8f15973ef8c3 ("ARM: vexpress: Add CPU >> clock-frequencies to TC2 device-tree") taken from Linaro Stable Kernel >> (LSK) massaged into mainline. > > Not sure you really need to mention commit hashes from outside of the > mainline Linux tree and the values I added to that commit were probably > copied from some patch originating from ARM or elsewhere anyway. So the > second paragraph is this commit message is probably superfluous. But > this is nitpicking I guess :-) Agreed. In the meantime we agreed that we don't have to use the clock-frequency property for eas. Instead, we can derive the cpu capacity values directly from the energy model. This will free us from the dependency towards this dtb property and the cpu_efficiency for the arm arch. This patch won't be part of the next posting any more. -- Dietmar > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts index 107395c..a596d45 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ reg = <0>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; cpu-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_BIG>; + clock-frequency = <1000000000>; }; cpu1: cpu@1 { @@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ reg = <1>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; cpu-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_BIG>; + clock-frequency = <1000000000>; }; cpu2: cpu@2 { @@ -55,6 +57,7 @@ reg = <0x100>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>; cpu-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_LITTLE>; + clock-frequency = <800000000>; }; cpu3: cpu@3 { @@ -63,6 +66,7 @@ reg = <0x101>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>; cpu-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_LITTLE>; + clock-frequency = <800000000>; }; cpu4: cpu@4 { @@ -71,6 +75,7 @@ reg = <0x102>; cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>; cpu-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_LITTLE>; + clock-frequency = <800000000>; }; idle-states {