Message ID | fe6d862c640a3708e80c0cc4c694ab5d9079060b.1434632966.git.nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi, On 18/06/2015 at 15:18:28 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote : > diff --git a/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README b/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README > index c53a19b4aab2..6650a8ffaa64 100644 > --- a/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README > +++ b/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README > @@ -90,6 +90,12 @@ the Atmel website: http://www.atmel.com. > + Datasheet > http://www.atmel.com/Images/Atmel-11238-32-bit-Cortex-A5-Microcontroller-SAMA5D4_Datasheet.pdf > > + * ARM Cortex-A5 + NEON based SoCs > + - sama5d2 family > + - sama5d27 > + + Datasheet > + Coming soon Shouldn't that go directly before or after the sama5d4 family ? > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug > index f1b157971366..140228d033c2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug > @@ -141,6 +141,12 @@ choice > depends on ARCH_AT91 > depends on SOC_SAMA5 > > + config AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU3 > + bool "Kernel low-level debugging on sama5d2" > + select DEBUG_AT91_UART > + depends on ARCH_AT91 > + depends on SOC_SAMA5 > + I think that at some point we'll have to kill those AT91_DEBUG_LL_* which are actually board specific and not soc specific. I already have a patch for that that I need to rebase. > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > index 43ec794d1057..e53780a28605 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > @@ -8,6 +8,18 @@ menuconfig ARCH_AT91 > select SOC_BUS > > if ARCH_AT91 > +config SOC_SAMA5D2 > + bool "SAMA5D2 family" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 > + select SOC_SAMA5 > + select CACHE_L2X0 > + select HAVE_FB_ATMEL > + select HAVE_AT91_UTMI > + select HAVE_AT91_USB_CLK > + select HAVE_AT91_H32MX > + select HAVE_AT91_GENERATED Seeing that, I think HAVE_AT91_GENERATED should include CLK somewhere in the name as this is only related to clocks.
Le 18/06/2015 17:21, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : > Hi, > > On 18/06/2015 at 15:18:28 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote : >> diff --git a/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README b/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README >> index c53a19b4aab2..6650a8ffaa64 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README >> +++ b/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README >> @@ -90,6 +90,12 @@ the Atmel website: http://www.atmel.com. >> + Datasheet >> http://www.atmel.com/Images/Atmel-11238-32-bit-Cortex-A5-Microcontroller-SAMA5D4_Datasheet.pdf >> >> + * ARM Cortex-A5 + NEON based SoCs >> + - sama5d2 family >> + - sama5d27 >> + + Datasheet >> + Coming soon > > Shouldn't that go directly before or after the sama5d4 family ? This is "after" sama5d4: I sorted this file according to SoC release date whereas I sorted the other entries in alpa-numerial order (sama5d2 placed before sama5d3). Is it what you answered? >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug >> index f1b157971366..140228d033c2 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug >> @@ -141,6 +141,12 @@ choice >> depends on ARCH_AT91 >> depends on SOC_SAMA5 >> >> + config AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU3 >> + bool "Kernel low-level debugging on sama5d2" >> + select DEBUG_AT91_UART >> + depends on ARCH_AT91 >> + depends on SOC_SAMA5 >> + > > I think that at some point we'll have to kill those AT91_DEBUG_LL_* > which are actually board specific and not soc specific. I already have a > patch for that that I need to rebase. Ok, it could definitively simplify the last weird bits of our sub-architecture ;-) >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig >> index 43ec794d1057..e53780a28605 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig >> @@ -8,6 +8,18 @@ menuconfig ARCH_AT91 >> select SOC_BUS >> >> if ARCH_AT91 >> +config SOC_SAMA5D2 >> + bool "SAMA5D2 family" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 >> + select SOC_SAMA5 >> + select CACHE_L2X0 >> + select HAVE_FB_ATMEL >> + select HAVE_AT91_UTMI >> + select HAVE_AT91_USB_CLK >> + select HAVE_AT91_H32MX >> + select HAVE_AT91_GENERATED > > Seeing that, I think HAVE_AT91_GENERATED should include CLK somewhere in > the name as this is only related to clocks. Absolutely, I changed it to HAVE_AT91_GENERATED_CLK which is somehow better. Also changed in my "generated clock" series sent to Boris. Thanks for your review. Bye,
On 29/06/2015 at 14:46:51 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote : > Le 18/06/2015 17:21, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > On 18/06/2015 at 15:18:28 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote : > >> diff --git a/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README b/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README > >> index c53a19b4aab2..6650a8ffaa64 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README > >> +++ b/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README > >> @@ -90,6 +90,12 @@ the Atmel website: http://www.atmel.com. > >> + Datasheet > >> http://www.atmel.com/Images/Atmel-11238-32-bit-Cortex-A5-Microcontroller-SAMA5D4_Datasheet.pdf > >> > >> + * ARM Cortex-A5 + NEON based SoCs > >> + - sama5d2 family > >> + - sama5d27 > >> + + Datasheet > >> + Coming soon > > > > Shouldn't that go directly before or after the sama5d4 family ? > > This is "after" sama5d4: I sorted this file according to SoC release > date whereas I sorted the other entries in alpa-numerial order (sama5d2 > placed before sama5d3). > > Is it what you answered? > No, I meant doing something like: * ARM Cortex-A5 + NEON based SoCs - sama5d4 family - sama5d41 - sama5d42 - sama5d43 - sama5d44 (device superset) + Datasheet http://www.atmel.com/Images/Atmel-11238-32-bit-Cortex-A5-Microcontroller-SAMA5D4_Datasheet.pdf - sama5d2 family - sama5d27 + Datasheet Coming soon Else, you end up with two "ARM Cortex-A5 + NEON based SoCs" sections.
Le 29/06/2015 17:04, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : > On 29/06/2015 at 14:46:51 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote : >> Le 18/06/2015 17:21, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 18/06/2015 at 15:18:28 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote : >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README b/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README >>>> index c53a19b4aab2..6650a8ffaa64 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README >>>> +++ b/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README >>>> @@ -90,6 +90,12 @@ the Atmel website: http://www.atmel.com. >>>> + Datasheet >>>> http://www.atmel.com/Images/Atmel-11238-32-bit-Cortex-A5-Microcontroller-SAMA5D4_Datasheet.pdf >>>> >>>> + * ARM Cortex-A5 + NEON based SoCs >>>> + - sama5d2 family >>>> + - sama5d27 >>>> + + Datasheet >>>> + Coming soon >>> >>> Shouldn't that go directly before or after the sama5d4 family ? >> >> This is "after" sama5d4: I sorted this file according to SoC release >> date whereas I sorted the other entries in alpa-numerial order (sama5d2 >> placed before sama5d3). >> >> Is it what you answered? >> > > No, I meant doing something like: > > * ARM Cortex-A5 + NEON based SoCs > - sama5d4 family > - sama5d41 > - sama5d42 > - sama5d43 > - sama5d44 (device superset) > + Datasheet > http://www.atmel.com/Images/Atmel-11238-32-bit-Cortex-A5-Microcontroller-SAMA5D4_Datasheet.pdf > - sama5d2 family > - sama5d27 > + Datasheet > Coming soon > > Else, you end up with two "ARM Cortex-A5 + NEON based SoCs" sections. Oh, yes. Sure, I'll modify this. Do you think that it's worth sending another series or I can take it for the pull-request when it's modified? Bye,
Le 28/07/2015 10:54, Nicolas Ferre a écrit : > Le 29/06/2015 17:04, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : >> On 29/06/2015 at 14:46:51 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote : >>> Le 18/06/2015 17:21, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 18/06/2015 at 15:18:28 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote : >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README b/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README >>>>> index c53a19b4aab2..6650a8ffaa64 100644 >>>>> --- a/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README >>>>> @@ -90,6 +90,12 @@ the Atmel website: http://www.atmel.com. >>>>> + Datasheet >>>>> http://www.atmel.com/Images/Atmel-11238-32-bit-Cortex-A5-Microcontroller-SAMA5D4_Datasheet.pdf >>>>> >>>>> + * ARM Cortex-A5 + NEON based SoCs >>>>> + - sama5d2 family >>>>> + - sama5d27 >>>>> + + Datasheet >>>>> + Coming soon >>>> >>>> Shouldn't that go directly before or after the sama5d4 family ? >>> >>> This is "after" sama5d4: I sorted this file according to SoC release >>> date whereas I sorted the other entries in alpa-numerial order (sama5d2 >>> placed before sama5d3). >>> >>> Is it what you answered? >>> >> >> No, I meant doing something like: >> >> * ARM Cortex-A5 + NEON based SoCs >> - sama5d4 family >> - sama5d41 >> - sama5d42 >> - sama5d43 >> - sama5d44 (device superset) >> + Datasheet >> http://www.atmel.com/Images/Atmel-11238-32-bit-Cortex-A5-Microcontroller-SAMA5D4_Datasheet.pdf >> - sama5d2 family >> - sama5d27 >> + Datasheet >> Coming soon >> >> Else, you end up with two "ARM Cortex-A5 + NEON based SoCs" sections. > > Oh, yes. Sure, I'll modify this. > > Do you think that it's worth sending another series or I can take it for > the pull-request when it's modified? Actually, I realized that I have some more nodes to add to the DT descriptions, to it's worth sending a v2 of this series... Bye,
diff --git a/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README b/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README index c53a19b4aab2..6650a8ffaa64 100644 --- a/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README +++ b/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README @@ -90,6 +90,12 @@ the Atmel website: http://www.atmel.com. + Datasheet http://www.atmel.com/Images/Atmel-11238-32-bit-Cortex-A5-Microcontroller-SAMA5D4_Datasheet.pdf + * ARM Cortex-A5 + NEON based SoCs + - sama5d2 family + - sama5d27 + + Datasheet + Coming soon + Linux kernel information ------------------------ diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt index 424ac8cbfa08..7f04b8ae4ca9 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ compatible: must be one of: o "atmel,at91sam9xe" * "atmel,sama5" for SoCs using a Cortex-A5, shall be extended with the specific SoC family: + o "atmel,sama5d2" shall be extended with the specific SoC compatible: + - "atmel,sama5d27" o "atmel,sama5d3" shall be extended with the specific SoC compatible: - "atmel,sama5d31" - "atmel,sama5d33" diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug index f1b157971366..140228d033c2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug @@ -141,6 +141,12 @@ choice depends on ARCH_AT91 depends on SOC_SAMA5 + config AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU3 + bool "Kernel low-level debugging on sama5d2" + select DEBUG_AT91_UART + depends on ARCH_AT91 + depends on SOC_SAMA5 + config DEBUG_BCM2835 bool "Kernel low-level debugging on BCM2835 PL011 UART" depends on ARCH_BCM2835 diff --git a/arch/arm/include/debug/at91.S b/arch/arm/include/debug/at91.S index c3c45e628e33..2556a8801c8c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/debug/at91.S +++ b/arch/arm/include/debug/at91.S @@ -13,9 +13,12 @@ #define AT91_DBGU 0xfffff200 /* AT91_BASE_DBGU0 */ #elif defined(CONFIG_AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU1) #define AT91_DBGU 0xffffee00 /* AT91_BASE_DBGU1 */ -#else +#elif defined(CONFIG_AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU2) /* On sama5d4, use USART3 as low level serial console */ #define AT91_DBGU 0xfc00c000 /* SAMA5D4_BASE_USART3 */ +#else +/* On sama5d2, use UART1 as low level serial console */ +#define AT91_DBGU 0xf8020000 #endif #ifdef CONFIG_MMU diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig index 43ec794d1057..e53780a28605 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig @@ -8,6 +8,18 @@ menuconfig ARCH_AT91 select SOC_BUS if ARCH_AT91 +config SOC_SAMA5D2 + bool "SAMA5D2 family" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 + select SOC_SAMA5 + select CACHE_L2X0 + select HAVE_FB_ATMEL + select HAVE_AT91_UTMI + select HAVE_AT91_USB_CLK + select HAVE_AT91_H32MX + select HAVE_AT91_GENERATED + help + Select this if ou are using one of Atmel's SAMA5D2 family SoC. + config SOC_SAMA5D3 bool "SAMA5D3 family" if ARCH_MULTI_V7 select SOC_SAMA5 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5.c index 41d829d8e7d5..90c3c3051ae7 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5.c @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ #include "soc.h" static const struct at91_soc sama5_socs[] = { + AT91_SOC(SAMA5D2_CIDR_MATCH, SAMA5D27_EXID_MATCH, + "sama5d27", "sama5d2"), AT91_SOC(SAMA5D3_CIDR_MATCH, SAMA5D31_EXID_MATCH, "sama5d31", "sama5d3"), AT91_SOC(SAMA5D3_CIDR_MATCH, SAMA5D33_EXID_MATCH, @@ -64,6 +66,7 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(sama5_dt, "Atmel SAMA5") MACHINE_END static const char *sama5_alt_dt_board_compat[] __initconst = { + "atmel,sama5d2", "atmel,sama5d4", NULL }; diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h index be23c400596b..8ede0ef86172 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h @@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs); #define AT91SAM9XE256_CIDR_MATCH 0x329a93a0 #define AT91SAM9XE512_CIDR_MATCH 0x329aa3a0 +#define SAMA5D2_CIDR_MATCH 0x0a5c08c0 +#define SAMA5D27_EXID_MATCH 0x00000021 + #define SAMA5D3_CIDR_MATCH 0x0a5c07c0 #define SAMA5D31_EXID_MATCH 0x00444300 #define SAMA5D33_EXID_MATCH 0x00414300