Message ID | 1437478567-11339-1-git-send-email-vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
Headers | show |
Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com> writes: > Add vendor/device id of QCA99X0 V2.0 to pci id table and > QCA99X0_HW_2_0_CHIP_ID_REV to ath10k_pci_supp_chips[] for > QCA99X0 to get detected by the driver. > > Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com> Thanks, applied. I just modified the commit log to make it a bit clear that QCA99X0 is now working: ath10k: add QCA99X0 to supported device list Add vendor/device id of QCA99X0 V2.0 to pci id table and QCA99X0_HW_2_0_CHIP_ID_REV to ath10k_pci_supp_chips[] for QCA99X0 to get detected by the driver. kvalo: now QCA99X0 family of chipsets is supported by ath10k. Tested client, AP and monitor mode with QCA9990. Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
On 2015-07-21 13:36, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > Add vendor/device id of QCA99X0 V2.0 to pci id table and > QCA99X0_HW_2_0_CHIP_ID_REV to ath10k_pci_supp_chips[] for > QCA99X0 to get detected by the driver. > > Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com> I just tested a 99X0 card, and I'm getting this: [ 8.742514] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142) [ 8.747173] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: pci irq msi interrupts 1 irq_mode 0 reset_mode 0 [ 11.793314] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive initialized event from target: 00000000 [ 11.793344] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to wait for target after cold reset: -110 [ 11.800814] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to reset chip: -110 [ 11.809228] ath10k_pci: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -110 This is on an AP148 board with Linux 3.18, backports generated from latest wireless-testing (2015-08-03) + all patches from kvalo's ath tree. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wednesday 05 August 2015 05:51 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2015-07-21 13:36, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >> Add vendor/device id of QCA99X0 V2.0 to pci id table and >> QCA99X0_HW_2_0_CHIP_ID_REV to ath10k_pci_supp_chips[] for >> QCA99X0 to get detected by the driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com> > I just tested a 99X0 card, and I'm getting this: > > [ 8.742514] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142) > [ 8.747173] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: pci irq msi interrupts 1 irq_mode 0 reset_mode 0 > [ 11.793314] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive initialized event from target: 00000000 > [ 11.793344] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to wait for target after cold reset: -110 > [ 11.800814] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to reset chip: -110 > [ 11.809228] ath10k_pci: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -110 > > This is on an AP148 board with Linux 3.18, backports generated from > latest wireless-testing (2015-08-03) + all patches from kvalo's ath > tree. Any idea about the version of AP148 that you are using?. By any chance did you check if QCA988X is working on the same board?. Vasanth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2015-08-06 09:43, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > On Wednesday 05 August 2015 05:51 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> On 2015-07-21 13:36, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>> Add vendor/device id of QCA99X0 V2.0 to pci id table and >>> QCA99X0_HW_2_0_CHIP_ID_REV to ath10k_pci_supp_chips[] for >>> QCA99X0 to get detected by the driver. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com> >> I just tested a 99X0 card, and I'm getting this: >> >> [ 8.742514] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142) >> [ 8.747173] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: pci irq msi interrupts 1 irq_mode 0 reset_mode 0 >> [ 11.793314] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive initialized event from target: 00000000 >> [ 11.793344] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to wait for target after cold reset: -110 >> [ 11.800814] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to reset chip: -110 >> [ 11.809228] ath10k_pci: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -110 >> >> This is on an AP148 board with Linux 3.18, backports generated from >> latest wireless-testing (2015-08-03) + all patches from kvalo's ath >> tree. > > Any idea about the version of AP148 that you are using?. By any chance did > you check if QCA988X is working on the same board?. No idea about the version, but QCA988X is working in the same slot. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 08/06/2015 12:59 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2015-08-06 09:43, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >> On Wednesday 05 August 2015 05:51 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >>> On 2015-07-21 13:36, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>> Add vendor/device id of QCA99X0 V2.0 to pci id table and >>>> QCA99X0_HW_2_0_CHIP_ID_REV to ath10k_pci_supp_chips[] for >>>> QCA99X0 to get detected by the driver. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com> >>> I just tested a 99X0 card, and I'm getting this: >>> >>> [ 8.742514] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142) >>> [ 8.747173] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: pci irq msi interrupts 1 > irq_mode 0 reset_mode 0 >>> [ 11.793314] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive initialized > event from target: 00000000 >>> [ 11.793344] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to wait for target after > cold reset: -110 >>> [ 11.800814] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to reset chip: -110 >>> [ 11.809228] ath10k_pci: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -110 >>> >>> This is on an AP148 board with Linux 3.18, backports generated from >>> latest wireless-testing (2015-08-03) + all patches from kvalo's ath >>> tree. >> Any idea about the version of AP148 that you are using?. By any chance > did >> you check if QCA988X is working on the same board?. > No idea about the version, but QCA988X is working in the same slot. QCA99X0 uses a different version of firmware from QCA988X. Could you verify which firmware version or file name is using? > - Felix > > _______________________________________________ > ath10k mailing list > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k Thanks, Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2015-08-06 20:45, Peter Oh wrote: > > On 08/06/2015 12:59 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> On 2015-08-06 09:43, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>> On Wednesday 05 August 2015 05:51 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >>>> On 2015-07-21 13:36, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >>>>> Add vendor/device id of QCA99X0 V2.0 to pci id table and >>>>> QCA99X0_HW_2_0_CHIP_ID_REV to ath10k_pci_supp_chips[] for >>>>> QCA99X0 to get detected by the driver. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com> >>>> I just tested a 99X0 card, and I'm getting this: >>>> >>>> [ 8.742514] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142) >>>> [ 8.747173] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: pci irq msi interrupts 1 >> irq_mode 0 reset_mode 0 >>>> [ 11.793314] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive initialized >> event from target: 00000000 >>>> [ 11.793344] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to wait for target after >> cold reset: -110 >>>> [ 11.800814] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to reset chip: -110 >>>> [ 11.809228] ath10k_pci: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -110 >>>> >>>> This is on an AP148 board with Linux 3.18, backports generated from >>>> latest wireless-testing (2015-08-03) + all patches from kvalo's ath >>>> tree. >>> Any idea about the version of AP148 that you are using?. By any chance >> did >>> you check if QCA988X is working on the same board?. >> No idea about the version, but QCA988X is working in the same slot. > QCA99X0 uses a different version of firmware from QCA988X. > Could you verify which firmware version or file name is using? ath10k/QCA99X0/hw2.0/firmware-5.bin_10.4.1.00007-1 from git is /lib/firmware/ath10k/QCA99X0/hw2.0/firmware-5.bin on the device. However, this error shows up even before it gets to the point of loading the firmware. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c index 5778e52..cc0e897 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(reset_mode, "0: auto, 1: warm only (default: 0)"); static const struct pci_device_id ath10k_pci_id_table[] = { { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, QCA988X_2_0_DEVICE_ID) }, /* PCI-E QCA988X V2 */ { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, QCA6174_2_1_DEVICE_ID) }, /* PCI-E QCA6174 V2.1 */ + { PCI_VDEVICE(ATHEROS, QCA99X0_2_0_DEVICE_ID) }, /* PCI-E QCA99X0 V2 */ {0} }; @@ -78,6 +79,7 @@ static const struct ath10k_pci_supp_chip ath10k_pci_supp_chips[] = { { QCA6174_2_1_DEVICE_ID, QCA6174_HW_3_0_CHIP_ID_REV }, { QCA6174_2_1_DEVICE_ID, QCA6174_HW_3_1_CHIP_ID_REV }, { QCA6174_2_1_DEVICE_ID, QCA6174_HW_3_2_CHIP_ID_REV }, + { QCA99X0_2_0_DEVICE_ID, QCA99X0_HW_2_0_CHIP_ID_REV }, }; static void ath10k_pci_buffer_cleanup(struct ath10k *ar);
Add vendor/device id of QCA99X0 V2.0 to pci id table and QCA99X0_HW_2_0_CHIP_ID_REV to ath10k_pci_supp_chips[] for QCA99X0 to get detected by the driver. Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)