diff mbox

[03/14] lpfc: in sli3 use configured sg_seg_cnt for sg_tablesize

Message ID 55e4bd8a.9Holn3dFdEAEsMk9%james.smart@avagotech.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

James Smart Aug. 31, 2015, 8:48 p.m. UTC
From: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>

Hi James,

We had some performance problems with RAID systems connected to LPe12k.
AFAICS, the reason is a small bug in lpfc.ko, causing the IO-size to
be smaller than expected.

The patch below fixes it for us.

Please CC me, I'm not on the list.

Best regards
Bodo

------------------------------------------------------

Currently the module parameter lpfc_sg_seg_count does not have effect
for sli3 devices.

In lpfc_sli_driver_resource_setup(), which is used for sli3, the code
writes the configured sg_seg_cnt into lpfc_template.sg_tablesize.
But lpfc_template is the template used for sli4 only. Thus the value should
correctly be written to lpfc_template_s3->sg_tablesize.

This patch is for kernel 4.1-rc5, but is tested with lpfc 10.2.405.26 only.

Signed-off-by: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@avagotech.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Sebastian Herbszt Sept. 1, 2015, 9:27 p.m. UTC | #1
James Smart wrote:
> 
> From: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Hi James,
> 
> We had some performance problems with RAID systems connected to LPe12k.
> AFAICS, the reason is a small bug in lpfc.ko, causing the IO-size to
> be smaller than expected.
> 
> The patch below fixes it for us.
> 
> Please CC me, I'm not on the list.
> 
> Best regards
> Bodo
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Currently the module parameter lpfc_sg_seg_count does not have effect
> for sli3 devices.
> 
> In lpfc_sli_driver_resource_setup(), which is used for sli3, the code
> writes the configured sg_seg_cnt into lpfc_template.sg_tablesize.
> But lpfc_template is the template used for sli4 only. Thus the value should
> correctly be written to lpfc_template_s3->sg_tablesize.
> 
> This patch is for kernel 4.1-rc5, but is tested with lpfc 10.2.405.26 only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@avagotech.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> index da9b6fc..81bfb2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> @@ -4994,7 +4994,7 @@ lpfc_sli_driver_resource_setup(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>  
>  	/* Initialize the host templates the configured values. */
>  	lpfc_vport_template.sg_tablesize = phba->cfg_sg_seg_cnt;
> -	lpfc_template.sg_tablesize = phba->cfg_sg_seg_cnt;
> +	lpfc_template_s3.sg_tablesize = phba->cfg_sg_seg_cnt;
>  
>  	/* There are going to be 2 reserved BDEs: 1 FCP cmnd + 1 FCP rsp */
>  	if (phba->cfg_enable_bg) {

Reviewed-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hannes Reinecke Sept. 14, 2015, 7:34 a.m. UTC | #2
On 08/31/2015 10:48 PM, James Smart wrote:
> 
> From: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Hi James,
> 
> We had some performance problems with RAID systems connected to LPe12k.
> AFAICS, the reason is a small bug in lpfc.ko, causing the IO-size to
> be smaller than expected.
> 
> The patch below fixes it for us.
> 
> Please CC me, I'm not on the list.
> 
> Best regards
> Bodo
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Currently the module parameter lpfc_sg_seg_count does not have effect
> for sli3 devices.
> 
> In lpfc_sli_driver_resource_setup(), which is used for sli3, the code
> writes the configured sg_seg_cnt into lpfc_template.sg_tablesize.
> But lpfc_template is the template used for sli4 only. Thus the value should
> correctly be written to lpfc_template_s3->sg_tablesize.
> 
> This patch is for kernel 4.1-rc5, but is tested with lpfc 10.2.405.26 only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@avagotech.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> index da9b6fc..81bfb2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> @@ -4994,7 +4994,7 @@ lpfc_sli_driver_resource_setup(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>  
>  	/* Initialize the host templates the configured values. */
>  	lpfc_vport_template.sg_tablesize = phba->cfg_sg_seg_cnt;
> -	lpfc_template.sg_tablesize = phba->cfg_sg_seg_cnt;
> +	lpfc_template_s3.sg_tablesize = phba->cfg_sg_seg_cnt;
>  
>  	/* There are going to be 2 reserved BDEs: 1 FCP cmnd + 1 FCP rsp */
>  	if (phba->cfg_enable_bg) {
> 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>

Cheers,

Hannes
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
index da9b6fc..81bfb2d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -4994,7 +4994,7 @@  lpfc_sli_driver_resource_setup(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
 
 	/* Initialize the host templates the configured values. */
 	lpfc_vport_template.sg_tablesize = phba->cfg_sg_seg_cnt;
-	lpfc_template.sg_tablesize = phba->cfg_sg_seg_cnt;
+	lpfc_template_s3.sg_tablesize = phba->cfg_sg_seg_cnt;
 
 	/* There are going to be 2 reserved BDEs: 1 FCP cmnd + 1 FCP rsp */
 	if (phba->cfg_enable_bg) {