Message ID | 1738265.GZcYUZQGSy@vostro.rjw.lan (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:17:05PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, October 07, 2015 03:03:57 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > > > If the upcoming system suspend is not going to be handled by the > > platform firmware, like in the suspend-to-idle case, it is not > > necessary to reset the controller in i8042_pm_suspend(), so avoid > > doing that. > > > > Moreover, if the system resume currently in progress has not been > > started by the platform firmware, like in the suspend-to-idle case, > > i8042_controller_resume() need not be called by i8042_pm_resume(), > > so avoid doing that too in that case. > > > > Additionally, try to catch the event that woke up the system by > > calling the interrupt handler early during system resume if it has > > not been started by the platform firmware. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > If there are no more comments here, I'll tentatively queue it up for v4.4 > along with the [1-2/3] from this series. > > Please let me know if there are any problems with that. No problems from my POV. Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Thanks.
On Wednesday, October 07, 2015 03:03:57 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > If the upcoming system suspend is not going to be handled by the > platform firmware, like in the suspend-to-idle case, it is not > necessary to reset the controller in i8042_pm_suspend(), so avoid > doing that. > > Moreover, if the system resume currently in progress has not been > started by the platform firmware, like in the suspend-to-idle case, > i8042_controller_resume() need not be called by i8042_pm_resume(), > so avoid doing that too in that case. > > Additionally, try to catch the event that woke up the system by > calling the interrupt handler early during system resume if it has > not been started by the platform firmware. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> If there are no more comments here, I'll tentatively queue it up for v4.4 along with the [1-2/3] from this series. Please let me know if there are any problems with that. Thanks, Rafael > --- > drivers/input/serio/i8042.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/i8042.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/suspend.h> > > #include <asm/io.h> > > @@ -1170,7 +1171,8 @@ static int i8042_pm_suspend(struct devic > { > int i; > > - i8042_controller_reset(true); > + if (pm_suspend_via_firmware()) > + i8042_controller_reset(true); > > /* Set up serio interrupts for system wakeup. */ > for (i = 0; i < I8042_NUM_PORTS; i++) { > @@ -1183,8 +1185,17 @@ static int i8042_pm_suspend(struct devic > return 0; > } > > +static int i8042_pm_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) > +{ > + if (!pm_resume_via_firmware()) > + i8042_interrupt(0, NULL); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int i8042_pm_resume(struct device *dev) > { > + bool force_reset; > int i; > > for (i = 0; i < I8042_NUM_PORTS; i++) { > @@ -1195,11 +1206,21 @@ static int i8042_pm_resume(struct device > } > > /* > - * On resume from S2R we always try to reset the controller > - * to bring it in a sane state. (In case of S2D we expect > - * BIOS to reset the controller for us.) > + * If platform firmware was not going to be involved in suspend, we did > + * not restore the controller state to whatever it had been at boot > + * time, so we do not need to do anything. > */ > - return i8042_controller_resume(true); > + if (!pm_suspend_via_firmware()) > + return 0; > + > + /* > + * We only need to reset the controller if we are resuming after handing > + * off control to the platform firmware, otherwise we can simply restore > + * the mode. > + */ > + force_reset = pm_resume_via_firmware(); > + > + return i8042_controller_resume(force_reset); > } > > static int i8042_pm_thaw(struct device *dev) > @@ -1223,6 +1244,7 @@ static int i8042_pm_restore(struct devic > > static const struct dev_pm_ops i8042_pm_ops = { > .suspend = i8042_pm_suspend, > + .resume_noirq = i8042_pm_resume_noirq, > .resume = i8042_pm_resume, > .thaw = i8042_pm_thaw, > .poweroff = i8042_pm_reset, > > -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Monday, October 12, 2015 01:11:44 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:17:05PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 07, 2015 03:03:57 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > > > > > If the upcoming system suspend is not going to be handled by the > > > platform firmware, like in the suspend-to-idle case, it is not > > > necessary to reset the controller in i8042_pm_suspend(), so avoid > > > doing that. > > > > > > Moreover, if the system resume currently in progress has not been > > > started by the platform firmware, like in the suspend-to-idle case, > > > i8042_controller_resume() need not be called by i8042_pm_resume(), > > > so avoid doing that too in that case. > > > > > > Additionally, try to catch the event that woke up the system by > > > calling the interrupt handler early during system resume if it has > > > not been started by the platform firmware. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > > > If there are no more comments here, I'll tentatively queue it up for v4.4 > > along with the [1-2/3] from this series. > > > > Please let me know if there are any problems with that. > > No problems from my POV. > > Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Index: linux-pm/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/i8042.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/suspend.h> #include <asm/io.h> @@ -1170,7 +1171,8 @@ static int i8042_pm_suspend(struct devic { int i; - i8042_controller_reset(true); + if (pm_suspend_via_firmware()) + i8042_controller_reset(true); /* Set up serio interrupts for system wakeup. */ for (i = 0; i < I8042_NUM_PORTS; i++) { @@ -1183,8 +1185,17 @@ static int i8042_pm_suspend(struct devic return 0; } +static int i8042_pm_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) +{ + if (!pm_resume_via_firmware()) + i8042_interrupt(0, NULL); + + return 0; +} + static int i8042_pm_resume(struct device *dev) { + bool force_reset; int i; for (i = 0; i < I8042_NUM_PORTS; i++) { @@ -1195,11 +1206,21 @@ static int i8042_pm_resume(struct device } /* - * On resume from S2R we always try to reset the controller - * to bring it in a sane state. (In case of S2D we expect - * BIOS to reset the controller for us.) + * If platform firmware was not going to be involved in suspend, we did + * not restore the controller state to whatever it had been at boot + * time, so we do not need to do anything. */ - return i8042_controller_resume(true); + if (!pm_suspend_via_firmware()) + return 0; + + /* + * We only need to reset the controller if we are resuming after handing + * off control to the platform firmware, otherwise we can simply restore + * the mode. + */ + force_reset = pm_resume_via_firmware(); + + return i8042_controller_resume(force_reset); } static int i8042_pm_thaw(struct device *dev) @@ -1223,6 +1244,7 @@ static int i8042_pm_restore(struct devic static const struct dev_pm_ops i8042_pm_ops = { .suspend = i8042_pm_suspend, + .resume_noirq = i8042_pm_resume_noirq, .resume = i8042_pm_resume, .thaw = i8042_pm_thaw, .poweroff = i8042_pm_reset,