diff mbox

drm/radeon/kms: fix suspend on rv530 asics

Message ID 1302629607-11637-1-git-send-email-alexdeucher@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Alex Deucher April 12, 2011, 5:33 p.m. UTC
Apparently only rv515 asics need the workaround
added in f24d86f1a49505cdea56728b853a5d0a3f8e3d11
(drm/radeon/kms: fix resume regression for some r5xx laptops).

Fixes:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34709

Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c |    6 +++++-
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Comments

Jerome Glisse April 13, 2011, 2:46 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
> Apparently only rv515 asics need the workaround
> added in f24d86f1a49505cdea56728b853a5d0a3f8e3d11
> (drm/radeon/kms: fix resume regression for some r5xx laptops).
>
> Fixes:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34709
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c |    6 +++++-
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> index 258fa5e..d71d375 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>  #include "atom.h"
>  #include "atom-names.h"
>  #include "atom-bits.h"
> +#include "radeon.h"
>
>  #define ATOM_COND_ABOVE                0
>  #define ATOM_COND_ABOVEOREQUAL 1
> @@ -101,7 +102,9 @@ static void debug_print_spaces(int n)
>  static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base,
>                                 uint32_t index, uint32_t data)
>  {
> +       struct radeon_device *rdev = ctx->card->dev->dev_private;
>        uint32_t temp = 0xCDCDCDCD;
> +
>        while (1)
>                switch (CU8(base)) {
>                case ATOM_IIO_NOP:
> @@ -112,7 +115,8 @@ static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base,
>                        base += 3;
>                        break;
>                case ATOM_IIO_WRITE:
> -                       (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
> +                       if (rdev->family == CHIP_RV515)
> +                               (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
>                        ctx->card->ioreg_write(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1), temp);
>                        base += 3;
>                        break;
> --
> 1.7.1.1
>


So this patch enable io write only for one family ? This looks utterly strange.

Cheers,
Jerome
Alex Deucher April 13, 2011, 2:52 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Apparently only rv515 asics need the workaround
>> added in f24d86f1a49505cdea56728b853a5d0a3f8e3d11
>> (drm/radeon/kms: fix resume regression for some r5xx laptops).
>>
>> Fixes:
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34709
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
>> Cc: stable@kernel.org
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c |    6 +++++-
>>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
>> index 258fa5e..d71d375 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>>  #include "atom.h"
>>  #include "atom-names.h"
>>  #include "atom-bits.h"
>> +#include "radeon.h"
>>
>>  #define ATOM_COND_ABOVE                0
>>  #define ATOM_COND_ABOVEOREQUAL 1
>> @@ -101,7 +102,9 @@ static void debug_print_spaces(int n)
>>  static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base,
>>                                 uint32_t index, uint32_t data)
>>  {
>> +       struct radeon_device *rdev = ctx->card->dev->dev_private;
>>        uint32_t temp = 0xCDCDCDCD;
>> +
>>        while (1)
>>                switch (CU8(base)) {
>>                case ATOM_IIO_NOP:
>> @@ -112,7 +115,8 @@ static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base,
>>                        base += 3;
>>                        break;
>>                case ATOM_IIO_WRITE:
>> -                       (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
>> +                       if (rdev->family == CHIP_RV515)
>> +                               (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
>>                        ctx->card->ioreg_write(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1), temp);
>>                        base += 3;
>>                        break;
>> --
>> 1.7.1.1
>>
>
>
> So this patch enable io write only for one family ? This looks utterly strange.

No, it just does a read before write for rv515.  I don't know why it
needs it, but it seems to.

Alex

>
> Cheers,
> Jerome
>
Dave Airlie April 13, 2011, 8:16 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Apparently only rv515 asics need the workaround
>>> added in f24d86f1a49505cdea56728b853a5d0a3f8e3d11
>>> (drm/radeon/kms: fix resume regression for some r5xx laptops).
>>>
>>> Fixes:
>>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34709
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: stable@kernel.org
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c |    6 +++++-
>>>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
>>> index 258fa5e..d71d375 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
>>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>>>  #include "atom.h"
>>>  #include "atom-names.h"
>>>  #include "atom-bits.h"
>>> +#include "radeon.h"
>>>
>>>  #define ATOM_COND_ABOVE                0
>>>  #define ATOM_COND_ABOVEOREQUAL 1
>>> @@ -101,7 +102,9 @@ static void debug_print_spaces(int n)
>>>  static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base,
>>>                                 uint32_t index, uint32_t data)
>>>  {
>>> +       struct radeon_device *rdev = ctx->card->dev->dev_private;
>>>        uint32_t temp = 0xCDCDCDCD;
>>> +
>>>        while (1)
>>>                switch (CU8(base)) {
>>>                case ATOM_IIO_NOP:
>>> @@ -112,7 +115,8 @@ static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base,
>>>                        base += 3;
>>>                        break;
>>>                case ATOM_IIO_WRITE:
>>> -                       (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
>>> +                       if (rdev->family == CHIP_RV515)
>>> +                               (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
>>>                        ctx->card->ioreg_write(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1), temp);
>>>                        base += 3;
>>>                        break;
>>> --
>>> 1.7.1.1
>>>
>>
>>
>> So this patch enable io write only for one family ? This looks utterly strange.
>
> No, it just does a read before write for rv515.  I don't know why it
> needs it, but it seems to.
>

Yeah I really wish I knew why either,

Thinkpad T60 with X1300, no resume without this, it failed in the
memory initialisation table. this was the only thing I could find to
fix it.

My x1300 desktop card works fine without this.

Dave.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
index 258fa5e..d71d375 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ 
 #include "atom.h"
 #include "atom-names.h"
 #include "atom-bits.h"
+#include "radeon.h"
 
 #define ATOM_COND_ABOVE		0
 #define ATOM_COND_ABOVEOREQUAL	1
@@ -101,7 +102,9 @@  static void debug_print_spaces(int n)
 static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base,
 				 uint32_t index, uint32_t data)
 {
+	struct radeon_device *rdev = ctx->card->dev->dev_private;
 	uint32_t temp = 0xCDCDCDCD;
+
 	while (1)
 		switch (CU8(base)) {
 		case ATOM_IIO_NOP:
@@ -112,7 +115,8 @@  static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base,
 			base += 3;
 			break;
 		case ATOM_IIO_WRITE:
-			(void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
+			if (rdev->family == CHIP_RV515)
+				(void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
 			ctx->card->ioreg_write(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1), temp);
 			base += 3;
 			break;