diff mbox

[v3] drm/i915/skl: If needed sanitize bios programmed cdclk

Message ID 1445001533-28070-1-git-send-email-shobhit.kumar@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Kumar, Shobhit Oct. 16, 2015, 1:18 p.m. UTC
Especially in cases where pre-os does not enable display, cdclk might
not be in sane state. During sanitization initialize cdclk with maximum
value till we get dynamic cdclk support.

v2: Check if BIOS programmed correctly rather than always calling init
    - Do validation of programmed cdctl and what it is expected
    - Only do slk_init_cdclk if validation failed else reuse BIOS
      programmed value

v3: Move the validation logic in a separate sanitize function (Ville)

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c     | 12 ++++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  1 +
 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Shobhit Kumar Oct. 19, 2015, 7:43 a.m. UTC | #1
On 10/16/2015 06:48 PM, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
> Especially in cases where pre-os does not enable display, cdclk might
> not be in sane state. During sanitization initialize cdclk with maximum
> value till we get dynamic cdclk support.
>
> v2: Check if BIOS programmed correctly rather than always calling init
>      - Do validation of programmed cdctl and what it is expected
>      - Only do slk_init_cdclk if validation failed else reuse BIOS
>        programmed value
>
> v3: Move the validation logic in a separate sanitize function (Ville)

Ville, does  this come even close to what you had in mind ?

>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c     | 12 ++++++++----
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  1 +
>   3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index b25e99a..86d43e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -2949,10 +2949,14 @@ void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>
>   		cdclk_freq = dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev);
>   		dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = cdclk_freq;
> -		if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
> -			DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");
> -		else
> -			intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
> +		if (skl_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv))
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitized cdclk programmed by pre-os\n");
> +		else {
> +			if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
> +				DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");
> +			else
> +				intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
> +		}
>   	} else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
>   		broxton_init_cdclk(dev);
>   		broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 5f37f84..98333d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -5784,6 +5784,37 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n");
>   }
>
> +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	uint32_t lcpll1 = I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL);
> +	uint32_t cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
> +	int freq = dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk;
> +
> +	/* Is PLL enabled and locked ? */
> +	if (!((lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE) && (lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_LOCK)))
> +		goto sanitize;
> +
> +	/* DPLL okay; verify the cdclock
> +	 *
> +	 * Noticed in some instances that the freq selection is correct but
> +	 * decimal part is programmed wrong from BIOS where pre-os does not
> +	 * enable display. Verify the same as well.
> +	 */
> +	if (cdctl == ((cdctl & CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK) | skl_cdclk_decimal(freq)))
> +		/* All well; nothing to sanitize */
> +		return false;
> +sanitize:
> +	/*
> +	 * As of now initialize with max cdclk till
> +	 * we get dynamic cdclk support
> +	 * */
> +	dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = 675000;
> +	skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv);
> +
> +	/* we did have to sanitize */
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>   /* Adjust CDclk dividers to allow high res or save power if possible */
>   static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
>   {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 0598932..ec10e6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ void broxton_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_device *dev);
>   void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>   void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>   void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>   void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>   void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>   		      struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
>
Ville Syrjala Oct. 19, 2015, 1:48 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 06:48:53PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
> Especially in cases where pre-os does not enable display, cdclk might
> not be in sane state. During sanitization initialize cdclk with maximum
> value till we get dynamic cdclk support.
> 
> v2: Check if BIOS programmed correctly rather than always calling init
>     - Do validation of programmed cdctl and what it is expected
>     - Only do slk_init_cdclk if validation failed else reuse BIOS
>       programmed value
> 
> v3: Move the validation logic in a separate sanitize function (Ville)
> 
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c     | 12 ++++++++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index b25e99a..86d43e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -2949,10 +2949,14 @@ void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>  
>  		cdclk_freq = dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev);
>  		dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = cdclk_freq;
> -		if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
> -			DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");
> -		else
> -			intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
> +		if (skl_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv))
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitized cdclk programmed by pre-os\n");
> +		else {
> +			if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
> +				DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");

Since skl_sanitize_cdclk() will enable the PLL this shouldn't
happen anymore, right?

> +			else
> +				intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
> +		}
>  	} else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
>  		broxton_init_cdclk(dev);
>  		broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 5f37f84..98333d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -5784,6 +5784,37 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n");
>  }
>  
> +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	uint32_t lcpll1 = I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL);
> +	uint32_t cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
> +	int freq = dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk;
> +
> +	/* Is PLL enabled and locked ? */
> +	if (!((lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE) && (lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_LOCK)))
> +		goto sanitize;
> +
> +	/* DPLL okay; verify the cdclock
> +	 *
> +	 * Noticed in some instances that the freq selection is correct but
> +	 * decimal part is programmed wrong from BIOS where pre-os does not
> +	 * enable display. Verify the same as well.
> +	 */
> +	if (cdctl == ((cdctl & CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK) | skl_cdclk_decimal(freq)))
> +		/* All well; nothing to sanitize */
> +		return false;
> +sanitize:
> +	/*
> +	 * As of now initialize with max cdclk till
> +	 * we get dynamic cdclk support
> +	 * */
> +	dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = 675000;

Should be '= dev_priv->max_cdclk'

I think we end up doing the intel_update_cdclk() before this gets
called, so max_cdclk should already contain something sensible. The
whole init sequence is a bit messy currently, but I think we can put
off cleaning it up after the dc6 stuff gets sorted.

> +	skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv);
> +
> +	/* we did have to sanitize */
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /* Adjust CDclk dividers to allow high res or save power if possible */
>  static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 0598932..ec10e6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ void broxton_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_device *dev);
>  void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  		      struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
> -- 
> 2.4.3
Shobhit Kumar Oct. 20, 2015, 9:57 a.m. UTC | #3
On 10/19/2015 07:18 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 06:48:53PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
>> Especially in cases where pre-os does not enable display, cdclk might
>> not be in sane state. During sanitization initialize cdclk with maximum
>> value till we get dynamic cdclk support.
>>
>> v2: Check if BIOS programmed correctly rather than always calling init
>>      - Do validation of programmed cdctl and what it is expected
>>      - Only do slk_init_cdclk if validation failed else reuse BIOS
>>        programmed value
>>
>> v3: Move the validation logic in a separate sanitize function (Ville)
>>
>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c     | 12 ++++++++----
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  1 +
>>   3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> index b25e99a..86d43e6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> @@ -2949,10 +2949,14 @@ void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>
>>   		cdclk_freq = dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev);
>>   		dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = cdclk_freq;
>> -		if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
>> -			DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");
>> -		else
>> -			intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
>> +		if (skl_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv))
>> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitized cdclk programmed by pre-os\n");
>> +		else {
>> +			if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
>> +				DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");
>
> Since skl_sanitize_cdclk() will enable the PLL this shouldn't
> happen anymore, right?
>

Yeah right. Will remove.

>> +			else
>> +				intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
>> +		}
>>   	} else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
>>   		broxton_init_cdclk(dev);
>>   		broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 5f37f84..98333d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -5784,6 +5784,37 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>   		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n");
>>   }
>>
>> +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>> +	uint32_t lcpll1 = I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL);
>> +	uint32_t cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
>> +	int freq = dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk;
>> +
>> +	/* Is PLL enabled and locked ? */
>> +	if (!((lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE) && (lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_LOCK)))
>> +		goto sanitize;
>> +
>> +	/* DPLL okay; verify the cdclock
>> +	 *
>> +	 * Noticed in some instances that the freq selection is correct but
>> +	 * decimal part is programmed wrong from BIOS where pre-os does not
>> +	 * enable display. Verify the same as well.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (cdctl == ((cdctl & CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK) | skl_cdclk_decimal(freq)))
>> +		/* All well; nothing to sanitize */
>> +		return false;
>> +sanitize:
>> +	/*
>> +	 * As of now initialize with max cdclk till
>> +	 * we get dynamic cdclk support
>> +	 * */
>> +	dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = 675000;
>
> Should be '= dev_priv->max_cdclk'
>
> I think we end up doing the intel_update_cdclk() before this gets
> called, so max_cdclk should already contain something sensible. The
> whole init sequence is a bit messy currently, but I think we can put
> off cleaning it up after the dc6 stuff gets sorted.
>

Actually at the end of skl_init_cdclock, intel_update_cdclk will be 
called and initialize the max_cdclk correctly. In case there was no 
sanitization needed, the BIOS programmed cdclk is stored in 
skl_boot_cdclk and that is used inside the skl_init_cdclk. Same is 
invoked resume time, so we need to update this variable or else change 
the logic.

>> +	skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv);
>> +
>> +	/* we did have to sanitize */
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>> +
>>   /* Adjust CDclk dividers to allow high res or save power if possible */
>>   static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
>>   {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> index 0598932..ec10e6a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ void broxton_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_device *dev);
>>   void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>   void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>   void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>   void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>   void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>>   		      struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
>> --
>> 2.4.3
>
Ville Syrjala Oct. 20, 2015, 11:19 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 03:27:24PM +0530, Kumar, Shobhit wrote:
> On 10/19/2015 07:18 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 06:48:53PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
> >> Especially in cases where pre-os does not enable display, cdclk might
> >> not be in sane state. During sanitization initialize cdclk with maximum
> >> value till we get dynamic cdclk support.
> >>
> >> v2: Check if BIOS programmed correctly rather than always calling init
> >>      - Do validation of programmed cdctl and what it is expected
> >>      - Only do slk_init_cdclk if validation failed else reuse BIOS
> >>        programmed value
> >>
> >> v3: Move the validation logic in a separate sanitize function (Ville)
> >>
> >> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c     | 12 ++++++++----
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  1 +
> >>   3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> >> index b25e99a..86d43e6 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> >> @@ -2949,10 +2949,14 @@ void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> >>
> >>   		cdclk_freq = dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev);
> >>   		dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = cdclk_freq;
> >> -		if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
> >> -			DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");
> >> -		else
> >> -			intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
> >> +		if (skl_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv))
> >> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitized cdclk programmed by pre-os\n");
> >> +		else {
> >> +			if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
> >> +				DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");
> >
> > Since skl_sanitize_cdclk() will enable the PLL this shouldn't
> > happen anymore, right?
> >
> 
> Yeah right. Will remove.
> 
> >> +			else
> >> +				intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
> >> +		}
> >>   	} else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
> >>   		broxton_init_cdclk(dev);
> >>   		broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> index 5f37f84..98333d3 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> @@ -5784,6 +5784,37 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >>   		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n");
> >>   }
> >>
> >> +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >> +{
> >> +	uint32_t lcpll1 = I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL);
> >> +	uint32_t cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
> >> +	int freq = dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk;
> >> +
> >> +	/* Is PLL enabled and locked ? */
> >> +	if (!((lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE) && (lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_LOCK)))
> >> +		goto sanitize;
> >> +
> >> +	/* DPLL okay; verify the cdclock
> >> +	 *
> >> +	 * Noticed in some instances that the freq selection is correct but
> >> +	 * decimal part is programmed wrong from BIOS where pre-os does not
> >> +	 * enable display. Verify the same as well.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	if (cdctl == ((cdctl & CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK) | skl_cdclk_decimal(freq)))
> >> +		/* All well; nothing to sanitize */
> >> +		return false;
> >> +sanitize:
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * As of now initialize with max cdclk till
> >> +	 * we get dynamic cdclk support
> >> +	 * */
> >> +	dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = 675000;
> >
> > Should be '= dev_priv->max_cdclk'
> >
> > I think we end up doing the intel_update_cdclk() before this gets
> > called, so max_cdclk should already contain something sensible. The
> > whole init sequence is a bit messy currently, but I think we can put
> > off cleaning it up after the dc6 stuff gets sorted.
> >
> 
> Actually at the end of skl_init_cdclock, intel_update_cdclk will be 
> called and initialize the max_cdclk correctly.

It gets called already earlier from intel_modeset_init().

> In case there was no 
> sanitization needed, the BIOS programmed cdclk is stored in 
> skl_boot_cdclk and that is used inside the skl_init_cdclk. Same is 
> invoked resume time, so we need to update this variable or else change 
> the logic.
> 
> >> +	skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv);
> >> +
> >> +	/* we did have to sanitize */
> >> +	return true;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>   /* Adjust CDclk dividers to allow high res or save power if possible */
> >>   static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
> >>   {
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> >> index 0598932..ec10e6a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> >> @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ void broxton_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_device *dev);
> >>   void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> >>   void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> >>   void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> >> +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> >>   void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> >>   void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >>   		      struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
> >> --
> >> 2.4.3
> >
Shobhit Kumar Oct. 20, 2015, 12:27 p.m. UTC | #5
On 10/20/2015 04:49 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 03:27:24PM +0530, Kumar, Shobhit wrote:
>> On 10/19/2015 07:18 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 06:48:53PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
>>>> Especially in cases where pre-os does not enable display, cdclk might
>>>> not be in sane state. During sanitization initialize cdclk with maximum
>>>> value till we get dynamic cdclk support.
>>>>
>>>> v2: Check if BIOS programmed correctly rather than always calling init
>>>>       - Do validation of programmed cdctl and what it is expected
>>>>       - Only do slk_init_cdclk if validation failed else reuse BIOS
>>>>         programmed value
>>>>
>>>> v3: Move the validation logic in a separate sanitize function (Ville)
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c     | 12 ++++++++----
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  1 +
>>>>    3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>>>> index b25e99a..86d43e6 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>>>> @@ -2949,10 +2949,14 @@ void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>>
>>>>    		cdclk_freq = dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev);
>>>>    		dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = cdclk_freq;
>>>> -		if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
>>>> -			DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");
>>>> -		else
>>>> -			intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
>>>> +		if (skl_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv))
>>>> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitized cdclk programmed by pre-os\n");
>>>> +		else {
>>>> +			if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
>>>> +				DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");
>>>
>>> Since skl_sanitize_cdclk() will enable the PLL this shouldn't
>>> happen anymore, right?
>>>
>>
>> Yeah right. Will remove.
>>
>>>> +			else
>>>> +				intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
>>>> +		}
>>>>    	} else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
>>>>    		broxton_init_cdclk(dev);
>>>>    		broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>>>> index 5f37f84..98333d3 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>>>> @@ -5784,6 +5784,37 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>>>    		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n");
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	uint32_t lcpll1 = I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL);
>>>> +	uint32_t cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
>>>> +	int freq = dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* Is PLL enabled and locked ? */
>>>> +	if (!((lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE) && (lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_LOCK)))
>>>> +		goto sanitize;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* DPLL okay; verify the cdclock
>>>> +	 *
>>>> +	 * Noticed in some instances that the freq selection is correct but
>>>> +	 * decimal part is programmed wrong from BIOS where pre-os does not
>>>> +	 * enable display. Verify the same as well.
>>>> +	 */
>>>> +	if (cdctl == ((cdctl & CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK) | skl_cdclk_decimal(freq)))
>>>> +		/* All well; nothing to sanitize */
>>>> +		return false;
>>>> +sanitize:
>>>> +	/*
>>>> +	 * As of now initialize with max cdclk till
>>>> +	 * we get dynamic cdclk support
>>>> +	 * */
>>>> +	dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = 675000;
>>>
>>> Should be '= dev_priv->max_cdclk'
>>>
>>> I think we end up doing the intel_update_cdclk() before this gets
>>> called, so max_cdclk should already contain something sensible. The
>>> whole init sequence is a bit messy currently, but I think we can put
>>> off cleaning it up after the dc6 stuff gets sorted.
>>>
>>
>> Actually at the end of skl_init_cdclock, intel_update_cdclk will be
>> called and initialize the max_cdclk correctly.
>
> It gets called already earlier from intel_modeset_init().

Yeah, I misunderstood your comment earlier.

>
>> In case there was no
>> sanitization needed, the BIOS programmed cdclk is stored in
>> skl_boot_cdclk and that is used inside the skl_init_cdclk. Same is
>> invoked resume time, so we need to update this variable or else change
>> the logic.
>>
>>>> +	skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv);
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* we did have to sanitize */
>>>> +	return true;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>    /* Adjust CDclk dividers to allow high res or save power if possible */
>>>>    static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
>>>>    {
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>>>> index 0598932..ec10e6a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>>>> @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ void broxton_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_device *dev);
>>>>    void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>    void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>    void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>> +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>    void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>>>    void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>>>>    		      struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
>>>> --
>>>> 2.4.3
>>>
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
index b25e99a..86d43e6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
@@ -2949,10 +2949,14 @@  void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 		cdclk_freq = dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev);
 		dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = cdclk_freq;
-		if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
-			DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");
-		else
-			intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
+		if (skl_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv))
+			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitized cdclk programmed by pre-os\n");
+		else {
+			if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
+				DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");
+			else
+				intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
+		}
 	} else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
 		broxton_init_cdclk(dev);
 		broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 5f37f84..98333d3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -5784,6 +5784,37 @@  void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n");
 }
 
+int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+	uint32_t lcpll1 = I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL);
+	uint32_t cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
+	int freq = dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk;
+
+	/* Is PLL enabled and locked ? */
+	if (!((lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE) && (lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_LOCK)))
+		goto sanitize;
+
+	/* DPLL okay; verify the cdclock
+	 *
+	 * Noticed in some instances that the freq selection is correct but
+	 * decimal part is programmed wrong from BIOS where pre-os does not
+	 * enable display. Verify the same as well.
+	 */
+	if (cdctl == ((cdctl & CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK) | skl_cdclk_decimal(freq)))
+		/* All well; nothing to sanitize */
+		return false;
+sanitize:
+	/*
+	 * As of now initialize with max cdclk till
+	 * we get dynamic cdclk support
+	 * */
+	dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = 675000;
+	skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv);
+
+	/* we did have to sanitize */
+	return true;
+}
+
 /* Adjust CDclk dividers to allow high res or save power if possible */
 static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 0598932..ec10e6a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@  void broxton_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_device *dev);
 void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 		      struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);