Message ID | 1445991421-29938-1-git-send-email-mwelling@ieee.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Headers | show |
Hi Michael, On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 07:17:01PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > Adds support for the i2c based tsc2004. Support was added to the tsc2005 driver > due to the similarity of the devices. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org> > --- > v2: Fixes Kconfig based on report for 0-day build bot. > > .../bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.txt | 38 ++++ > drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig | 7 +- > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++----- Could we maybe split the code into core, spi and i2c drivers instead of keeping everything together and rely on #ifdefs? Thanks!
Hi Michael,
[auto build test ERROR on input/next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Michael-Welling/Input-tsc2005-Add-support-for-tsc2004/20151028-082017
config: x86_64-randconfig-s1-10281141 (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/built-in.o: In function `tsc2005_cmd':
tsc2005.c:(.text+0x21a352): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_write_byte'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `tsc200x_probe_common':
>> tsc2005.c:(.text+0x21b554): undefined reference to `__devm_regmap_init_i2c'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `tsc2005_modinit':
tsc2005.c:(.init.text+0xe2b2): undefined reference to `i2c_register_driver'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `tsc2005_exit':
tsc2005.c:(.exit.text+0xf4c): undefined reference to `i2c_del_driver'
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 06:51:41PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Michael, > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 07:17:01PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > > Adds support for the i2c based tsc2004. Support was added to the tsc2005 driver > > due to the similarity of the devices. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org> > > --- > > v2: Fixes Kconfig based on report for 0-day build bot. > > > > .../bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.txt | 38 ++++ > > drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig | 7 +- > > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++----- > > Could we maybe split the code into core, spi and i2c drivers instead of > keeping everything together and rely on #ifdefs? > Dmitry, So then we have three files? Perhaps: drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.c drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc200x-core.c Please ellaborate exactly how you want things to be structured and named so that I don't waste time in revision. It appears that I can't make the build bot happy the way it is. > Thanks! > > -- > Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:37:35PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Michael, > > [auto build test ERROR on input/next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Michael-Welling/Input-tsc2005-Add-support-for-tsc2004/20151028-082017 > config: x86_64-randconfig-s1-10281141 (attached as .config) > reproduce: > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make ARCH=x86_64 > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tsc2005_cmd': > tsc2005.c:(.text+0x21a352): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_write_byte' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tsc200x_probe_common': > >> tsc2005.c:(.text+0x21b554): undefined reference to `__devm_regmap_init_i2c' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tsc2005_modinit': > tsc2005.c:(.init.text+0xe2b2): undefined reference to `i2c_register_driver' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tsc2005_exit': > tsc2005.c:(.exit.text+0xf4c): undefined reference to `i2c_del_driver' > Sorry Mr. Robot but this configuration does not make sense. How is CONFIG_REGMAP_I2C=m set without CONFIG_I2C being selected? CONFIG_REGMAP_I2C depends on CONFIG_I2C. > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:23:34AM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 06:51:41PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 07:17:01PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > > > Adds support for the i2c based tsc2004. Support was added to the tsc2005 driver > > > due to the similarity of the devices. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org> > > > --- > > > v2: Fixes Kconfig based on report for 0-day build bot. > > > > > > .../bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.txt | 38 ++++ > > > drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig | 7 +- > > > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++----- > > > > Could we maybe split the code into core, spi and i2c drivers instead of > > keeping everything together and rely on #ifdefs? > > > Dmitry, > > So then we have three files? > Perhaps: > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.c > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc200x-core.c > > Please ellaborate exactly how you want things to be structured and named so > that I don't waste time in revision. Sure, the naming above is fine. You'd have to export the tsc_common_probe() and put I2C and SPI bits into tsc2005.c/tsc2004.c I'd probably have separate Kconfig entries for TSC2004 and TSC2005 and have the core be invisible module that the former 2 explicitly "select". Does this make sense? Thanks.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:38:31AM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:37:35PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > [auto build test ERROR on input/next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] > > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Michael-Welling/Input-tsc2005-Add-support-for-tsc2004/20151028-082017 > > config: x86_64-randconfig-s1-10281141 (attached as .config) > > reproduce: > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > make ARCH=x86_64 > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tsc2005_cmd': > > tsc2005.c:(.text+0x21a352): undefined reference to `i2c_smbus_write_byte' > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tsc200x_probe_common': > > >> tsc2005.c:(.text+0x21b554): undefined reference to `__devm_regmap_init_i2c' > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tsc2005_modinit': > > tsc2005.c:(.init.text+0xe2b2): undefined reference to `i2c_register_driver' > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tsc2005_exit': > > tsc2005.c:(.exit.text+0xf4c): undefined reference to `i2c_del_driver' > > > > Sorry Mr. Robot but this configuration does not make sense. > > How is CONFIG_REGMAP_I2C=m set without CONFIG_I2C being selected? > CONFIG_REGMAP_I2C depends on CONFIG_I2C. The call to devm_regmap_init_i2c() in tsc200x_probe_common() is not protected by #ifdef guard and we do not have stub for it in case of !CONFIG_I2C. Thanks.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:41:52PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:23:34AM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 06:51:41PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 07:17:01PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > > > > Adds support for the i2c based tsc2004. Support was added to the tsc2005 driver > > > > due to the similarity of the devices. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org> > > > > --- > > > > v2: Fixes Kconfig based on report for 0-day build bot. > > > > > > > > .../bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.txt | 38 ++++ > > > > drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig | 7 +- > > > > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++----- > > > > > > Could we maybe split the code into core, spi and i2c drivers instead of > > > keeping everything together and rely on #ifdefs? > > > > > Dmitry, > > > > So then we have three files? > > Perhaps: > > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.c > > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c > > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc200x-core.c > > > > Please ellaborate exactly how you want things to be structured and named so > > that I don't waste time in revision. > > Sure, the naming above is fine. You'd have to export the > tsc_common_probe() and put I2C and SPI bits into tsc2005.c/tsc2004.c > > I'd probably have separate Kconfig entries for TSC2004 and TSC2005 and > have the core be invisible module that the former 2 explicitly "select". > > Does this make sense? Yes it does. I have been told that using wildcard names is bad in other subsystems. Perhaps tsc200x-core.c should be called something else because it has nothing to do with the tsc2007 but it is covered by the wildcard. You you think this is a big deal? > > Thanks. > > -- > Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:48:29AM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:41:52PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:23:34AM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 06:51:41PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 07:17:01PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > > > > > Adds support for the i2c based tsc2004. Support was added to the tsc2005 driver > > > > > due to the similarity of the devices. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org> > > > > > --- > > > > > v2: Fixes Kconfig based on report for 0-day build bot. > > > > > > > > > > .../bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.txt | 38 ++++ > > > > > drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig | 7 +- > > > > > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++----- > > > > > > > > Could we maybe split the code into core, spi and i2c drivers instead of > > > > keeping everything together and rely on #ifdefs? > > > > > > > Dmitry, > > > > > > So then we have three files? > > > Perhaps: > > > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.c > > > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c > > > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc200x-core.c > > > > > > Please ellaborate exactly how you want things to be structured and named so > > > that I don't waste time in revision. > > > > Sure, the naming above is fine. You'd have to export the > > tsc_common_probe() and put I2C and SPI bits into tsc2005.c/tsc2004.c > > > > I'd probably have separate Kconfig entries for TSC2004 and TSC2005 and > > have the core be invisible module that the former 2 explicitly "select". > > > > Does this make sense? > > Yes it does. > > I have been told that using wildcard names is bad in other subsystems. > Perhaps tsc200x-core.c should be called something else because it has > nothing to do with the tsc2007 but it is covered by the wildcard. > > You you think this is a big deal? No I do not. Thanks.
On Tuesday 27 October 2015 23:12:58 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Yes it does. > > > > I have been told that using wildcard names is bad in other subsystems. > > Perhaps tsc200x-core.c should be called something else because it has > > nothing to do with the tsc2007 but it is covered by the wildcard. > > > > You you think this is a big deal? > > No I do not. To clarify: using wildcards in DT bindings is bad, because that is the only way to clearly identify small differences between related devices there. In file names or identifiers in the kernel, there is no problem. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..14a37fb --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.txt @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +* Texas Instruments tsc2004 touchscreen controller + +Required properties: + - compatible : "ti,tsc2004" + - interrupts : IRQ specifier + - vio-supply : Regulator specifier + +Optional properties: + - reset-gpios : GPIO specifier + - ti,x-plate-ohms : integer, resistance of the touchscreen's X plates + in ohm (defaults to 280) + - ti,esd-recovery-timeout-ms : integer, if the touchscreen does not respond after + the configured time (in milli seconds), the driver + will reset it. This is disabled by default. + - properties defined in touchscreen.txt + +Example: + +&i2c3 { + tsc2004@48 { + compatible = "ti,tsc2004"; + reg = <0x48>; + vio-supply = <&vio>; + + reset-gpios = <&gpio4 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + interrupts-extended = <&gpio1 27 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + + touchscreen-fuzz-x = <4>; + touchscreen-fuzz-y = <7>; + touchscreen-fuzz-pressure = <2>; + touchscreen-size-x = <4096>; + touchscreen-size-y = <4096>; + touchscreen-max-pressure = <2048>; + + ti,x-plate-ohms = <280>; + ti,esd-recovery-timeout-ms = <8000>; + }; +} diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig index 80cc698..7355579 100644 --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig @@ -940,9 +940,10 @@ config TOUCHSCREEN_TSC_SERIO module will be called tsc40. config TOUCHSCREEN_TSC2005 - tristate "TSC2005 based touchscreens" - depends on SPI_MASTER - select REGMAP_SPI + tristate "TSC2004/TSC2005 based touchscreens" + depends on SPI_MASTER || I2C + select REGMAP_SPI if SPI_MASTER + select REGMAP_I2C if I2C help Say Y here if you have a TSC2005 based touchscreen. diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c index 0f65d02..08decd4 100644 --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/pm.h> #include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/i2c.h> #include <linux/spi/spi.h> #include <linux/spi/tsc2005.h> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> @@ -151,6 +152,8 @@ struct tsc2005_data { struct tsc2005 { struct spi_device *spi; + struct i2c_client *i2c; + struct device *dev; struct regmap *regmap; struct input_dev *idev; @@ -182,9 +185,11 @@ struct tsc2005 { struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio; void (*set_reset)(bool enable); + + int irq; }; -static int tsc2005_cmd(struct tsc2005 *ts, u8 cmd) +static int tsc2005_cmd_spi(struct tsc2005 *ts, u8 cmd) { u8 tx = TSC2005_CMD | TSC2005_CMD_12BIT | cmd; struct spi_transfer xfer = { @@ -200,7 +205,7 @@ static int tsc2005_cmd(struct tsc2005 *ts, u8 cmd) error = spi_sync(ts->spi, &msg); if (error) { - dev_err(&ts->spi->dev, "%s: failed, command: %x, error: %d\n", + dev_err(ts->dev, "%s: failed, command: %x, spi error: %d\n", __func__, cmd, error); return error; } @@ -208,6 +213,32 @@ static int tsc2005_cmd(struct tsc2005 *ts, u8 cmd) return 0; } +static int tsc2005_cmd_i2c(struct tsc2005 *ts, u8 cmd) +{ + u8 tx = TSC2005_CMD | TSC2005_CMD_12BIT | cmd; + s32 data; + + data = i2c_smbus_write_byte(ts->i2c, tx); + if (data < 0) { + dev_err(&ts->dev, "%s: failed, command: %x i2c error: %d\n", + __func__, cmd, data); + return data; + } + + return 0; +} + +static int tsc2005_cmd(struct tsc2005 *ts, u8 cmd) +{ + if (ts->spi) + return tsc2005_cmd_spi(ts, cmd); + + if (ts->i2c) + return tsc2005_cmd_i2c(ts, cmd); + + return -ENODEV; +} + static void tsc2005_update_pen_state(struct tsc2005 *ts, int x, int y, int pressure) { @@ -227,7 +258,7 @@ static void tsc2005_update_pen_state(struct tsc2005 *ts, } } input_sync(ts->idev); - dev_dbg(&ts->spi->dev, "point(%4d,%4d), pressure (%4d)\n", x, y, + dev_dbg(ts->dev, "point(%4d,%4d), pressure (%4d)\n", x, y, pressure); } @@ -329,12 +360,12 @@ static void __tsc2005_disable(struct tsc2005 *ts) { tsc2005_stop_scan(ts); - disable_irq(ts->spi->irq); + disable_irq(ts->irq); del_timer_sync(&ts->penup_timer); cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ts->esd_work); - enable_irq(ts->spi->irq); + enable_irq(ts->irq); } /* must be called with ts->mutex held */ @@ -487,9 +518,9 @@ static void tsc2005_esd_work(struct work_struct *work) * then we should reset the controller as if from power-up and start * scanning again. */ - dev_info(&ts->spi->dev, "TSC2005 not responding - resetting\n"); + dev_info(ts->dev, "TSC2005 not responding - resetting\n"); - disable_irq(ts->spi->irq); + disable_irq(ts->irq); del_timer_sync(&ts->penup_timer); tsc2005_update_pen_state(ts, 0, 0, 0); @@ -498,7 +529,7 @@ static void tsc2005_esd_work(struct work_struct *work) usleep_range(100, 500); /* only 10us required */ tsc2005_set_reset(ts, true); - enable_irq(ts->spi->irq); + enable_irq(ts->irq); tsc2005_start_scan(ts); out: @@ -540,10 +571,10 @@ static void tsc2005_close(struct input_dev *input) mutex_unlock(&ts->mutex); } -static int tsc2005_probe(struct spi_device *spi) +static int tsc200x_probe_common(struct device *dev, int irq, __u16 bustype) { - const struct tsc2005_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&spi->dev); - struct device_node *np = spi->dev.of_node; + const struct tsc2005_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev); + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; struct tsc2005 *ts; struct input_dev *input_dev; @@ -558,12 +589,12 @@ static int tsc2005_probe(struct spi_device *spi) int error; if (!np && !pdata) { - dev_err(&spi->dev, "no platform data\n"); + dev_err(dev, "no platform data\n"); return -ENODEV; } - if (spi->irq <= 0) { - dev_err(&spi->dev, "no irq\n"); + if (irq <= 0) { + dev_err(dev, "no irq\n"); return -ENODEV; } @@ -584,45 +615,46 @@ static int tsc2005_probe(struct spi_device *spi) &esd_timeout); } - spi->mode = SPI_MODE_0; - spi->bits_per_word = 8; - if (!spi->max_speed_hz) - spi->max_speed_hz = TSC2005_SPI_MAX_SPEED_HZ; - - error = spi_setup(spi); - if (error) - return error; - - ts = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*ts), GFP_KERNEL); + ts = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ts), GFP_KERNEL); if (!ts) return -ENOMEM; - input_dev = devm_input_allocate_device(&spi->dev); + input_dev = devm_input_allocate_device(dev); if (!input_dev) return -ENOMEM; - ts->spi = spi; + ts->irq = irq; + ts->dev = dev; ts->idev = input_dev; - ts->regmap = devm_regmap_init_spi(spi, &tsc2005_regmap_config); + if (bustype == BUS_SPI) { + ts->spi = to_spi_device(dev); + ts->regmap = devm_regmap_init_spi(ts->spi, + &tsc2005_regmap_config); + } else if (bustype == BUS_I2C) { + ts->i2c = to_i2c_client(dev); + ts->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(ts->i2c, + &tsc2005_regmap_config); + } + if (IS_ERR(ts->regmap)) return PTR_ERR(ts->regmap); ts->x_plate_ohm = x_plate_ohm; ts->esd_timeout = esd_timeout; - ts->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&spi->dev, "reset", + ts->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH); if (IS_ERR(ts->reset_gpio)) { error = PTR_ERR(ts->reset_gpio); - dev_err(&spi->dev, "error acquiring reset gpio: %d\n", error); + dev_err(dev, "error acquiring reset gpio: %d\n", error); return error; } - ts->vio = devm_regulator_get_optional(&spi->dev, "vio"); + ts->vio = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vio"); if (IS_ERR(ts->vio)) { error = PTR_ERR(ts->vio); - dev_err(&spi->dev, "vio regulator missing (%d)", error); + dev_err(dev, "vio regulator missing (%d)", error); return error; } @@ -637,12 +669,12 @@ static int tsc2005_probe(struct spi_device *spi) INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ts->esd_work, tsc2005_esd_work); snprintf(ts->phys, sizeof(ts->phys), - "%s/input-ts", dev_name(&spi->dev)); + "%s/input-ts", dev_name(dev)); input_dev->name = "TSC2005 touchscreen"; input_dev->phys = ts->phys; - input_dev->id.bustype = BUS_SPI; - input_dev->dev.parent = &spi->dev; + input_dev->id.bustype = bustype; + input_dev->dev.parent = dev; input_dev->evbit[0] = BIT(EV_ABS) | BIT(EV_KEY); input_dev->keybit[BIT_WORD(BTN_TOUCH)] = BIT_MASK(BTN_TOUCH); @@ -661,12 +693,12 @@ static int tsc2005_probe(struct spi_device *spi) /* Ensure the touchscreen is off */ tsc2005_stop_scan(ts); - error = devm_request_threaded_irq(&spi->dev, spi->irq, NULL, + error = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, tsc2005_irq_thread, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT, "tsc2005", ts); if (error) { - dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to request irq, err: %d\n", error); + dev_err(dev, "Failed to request irq, err: %d\n", error); return error; } @@ -677,32 +709,49 @@ static int tsc2005_probe(struct spi_device *spi) return error; } - dev_set_drvdata(&spi->dev, ts); - error = sysfs_create_group(&spi->dev.kobj, &tsc2005_attr_group); + dev_set_drvdata(dev, ts); + error = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, &tsc2005_attr_group); if (error) { - dev_err(&spi->dev, + dev_err(dev, "Failed to create sysfs attributes, err: %d\n", error); goto disable_regulator; } error = input_register_device(ts->idev); if (error) { - dev_err(&spi->dev, + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register input device, err: %d\n", error); goto err_remove_sysfs; } - irq_set_irq_wake(spi->irq, 1); + irq_set_irq_wake(irq, 1); return 0; err_remove_sysfs: - sysfs_remove_group(&spi->dev.kobj, &tsc2005_attr_group); + sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &tsc2005_attr_group); disable_regulator: if (ts->vio) regulator_disable(ts->vio); return error; } + +static int tsc2005_probe(struct spi_device *spi) +{ + int error; + + spi->mode = SPI_MODE_0; + spi->bits_per_word = 8; + if (!spi->max_speed_hz) + spi->max_speed_hz = TSC2005_SPI_MAX_SPEED_HZ; + + error = spi_setup(spi); + if (error) + return error; + + return tsc200x_probe_common(&spi->dev, spi->irq, BUS_SPI); +} + static int tsc2005_remove(struct spi_device *spi) { struct tsc2005 *ts = dev_get_drvdata(&spi->dev); @@ -759,7 +808,78 @@ static struct spi_driver tsc2005_driver = { .remove = tsc2005_remove, }; -module_spi_driver(tsc2005_driver); +static int tsc2004_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, + const struct i2c_device_id *id) + +{ + return tsc200x_probe_common(&i2c->dev, i2c->irq, BUS_I2C); +} + +static int tsc2004_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c) +{ + struct tsc2005 *ts = dev_get_drvdata(&i2c->dev); + + sysfs_remove_group(&i2c->dev.kobj, &tsc2005_attr_group); + + if (ts->vio) + regulator_disable(ts->vio); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct i2c_device_id tsc2004_idtable[] = { + { "tsc2004", 0 }, + { } +}; + +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tsc2004_idtable); + +#ifdef CONFIG_OF +static const struct of_device_id tsc2004_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "ti,tsc2004" }, + { /* sentinel */ } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tsc2004_of_match); +#endif + +static struct i2c_driver tsc2004_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "tsc2004", + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(tsc2004_of_match), + .pm = &tsc2005_pm_ops, + }, + .id_table = tsc2004_idtable, + .probe = tsc2004_probe, + .remove = tsc2004_remove, +}; + +static int __init tsc2005_modinit(void) +{ + int ret = 0; +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C) + ret = i2c_add_driver(&tsc2004_driver); + if (ret != 0) + pr_err("Failed to register tsc2004 I2C driver: %d\n", ret); +#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_SPI_MASTER) + ret = spi_register_driver(&tsc2005_driver); + if (ret != 0) + pr_err("Failed to register tsc2005 SPI driver: %d\n", ret); +#endif + return ret; +} +module_init(tsc2005_modinit); + +static void __exit tsc2005_exit(void) +{ +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C) + i2c_del_driver(&tsc2004_driver); +#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_SPI_MASTER) + spi_unregister_driver(&tsc2005_driver); +#endif +} +module_exit(tsc2005_exit); MODULE_AUTHOR("Lauri Leukkunen <lauri.leukkunen@nokia.com>"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TSC2005 Touchscreen Driver");
Adds support for the i2c based tsc2004. Support was added to the tsc2005 driver due to the similarity of the devices. Signed-off-by: Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org> --- v2: Fixes Kconfig based on report for 0-day build bot. .../bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.txt | 38 ++++ drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig | 7 +- drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++----- 3 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.txt