Message ID | 1445944594-244149-1-git-send-email-huangdaode@hisilicon.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
From: huangdaode <huangdaode@hisilicon.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:16:34 +0800 > From: yankejian <yankejian@huawei.com> > > updates the bindings documents and dtsi file according to the review > comments[https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/21/670] from Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: yankejian <yankejian@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: huangdaode <huangdaode@hisilicon.com> Applied, thanks.
On Tuesday 27 October 2015 19:16:34 huangdaode wrote: > mdio@803c0000 { > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; > - compatible = "hisilicon,mdio","hisilicon,hns-mdio"; > + compatible = "hisilicon,hns-mdio","hisilicon,mdio"; > reg = <0x0 0x803c0000 0x0 0x10000>; > > Does "hisilicon,mdio" actually have a specific meaning? Is that just there for legacy reasons? Arnd
On 2015/10/30 22:20, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 27 October 2015 19:16:34 huangdaode wrote: >> mdio@803c0000 { >> #address-cells = <1>; >> #size-cells = <0>; >> - compatible = "hisilicon,mdio","hisilicon,hns-mdio"; >> + compatible = "hisilicon,hns-mdio","hisilicon,mdio"; >> reg = <0x0 0x803c0000 0x0 0x10000>; >> >> > Does "hisilicon,mdio" actually have a specific meaning? Is that just there > for legacy reasons? > > Arnd > > . > hi Arnd, "hisilicon,mdio" is the gernerical configuation compatible for the default hisilicon chip, We use generic hisilicon since our MDIO/PHY is same across flavour of SoCs.
On 10/31/2015 1:40 AM, huangdaode wrote: > On 2015/10/30 22:20, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Tuesday 27 October 2015 19:16:34 huangdaode wrote: >>> mdio@803c0000 { >>> #address-cells = <1>; >>> #size-cells = <0>; >>> - compatible = "hisilicon,mdio","hisilicon,hns-mdio"; >>> + compatible = "hisilicon,hns-mdio","hisilicon,mdio"; >>> reg = <0x0 0x803c0000 0x0 0x10000>; >>> >> Does "hisilicon,mdio" actually have a specific meaning? Is that just >> there >> for legacy reasons? >> >> Arnd >> >> . >> > hi Arnd, > "hisilicon,mdio" is the gernerical configuation compatible for the > default hisilicon chip, > We use generic hisilicon since our MDIO/PHY is same across flavour of > SoCs. > Hi Arnd, Yes, "hisilicon,mdio" exists for the legacy reasons to support older SoC Hip04. Best Regards Salil
On Saturday 31 October 2015 02:18:19 Salil Mehta wrote: > On 10/31/2015 1:40 AM, huangdaode wrote: > > On 2015/10/30 22:20, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Tuesday 27 October 2015 19:16:34 huangdaode wrote: > >>> mdio@803c0000 { > >>> #address-cells = <1>; > >>> #size-cells = <0>; > >>> - compatible = "hisilicon,mdio","hisilicon,hns-mdio"; > >>> + compatible = "hisilicon,hns-mdio","hisilicon,mdio"; > >>> reg = <0x0 0x803c0000 0x0 0x10000>; > >>> > >> Does "hisilicon,mdio" actually have a specific meaning? Is that just > >> there > >> for legacy reasons? > >> > >> Arnd > >> > >> . > >> > > hi Arnd, > > "hisilicon,mdio" is the gernerical configuation compatible for the > > default hisilicon chip, > > We use generic hisilicon since our MDIO/PHY is same across flavour of > > SoCs. > > > Hi Arnd, > Yes, "hisilicon,mdio" exists for the legacy reasons to support older SoC > Hip04. I see. In that case, that compatible string should probably be mentioned only as 'optional' in the binding, and not used for devices other than hip04. Arnd
On 2015/11/3 6:05, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 31 October 2015 02:18:19 Salil Mehta wrote: >> On 10/31/2015 1:40 AM, huangdaode wrote: >>> On 2015/10/30 22:20, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>> On Tuesday 27 October 2015 19:16:34 huangdaode wrote: >>>>> mdio@803c0000 { >>>>> #address-cells = <1>; >>>>> #size-cells = <0>; >>>>> - compatible = "hisilicon,mdio","hisilicon,hns-mdio"; >>>>> + compatible = "hisilicon,hns-mdio","hisilicon,mdio"; >>>>> reg = <0x0 0x803c0000 0x0 0x10000>; >>>>> >>>> Does "hisilicon,mdio" actually have a specific meaning? Is that just >>>> there >>>> for legacy reasons? >>>> >>>> Arnd >>>> >>>> . >>>> >>> hi Arnd, >>> "hisilicon,mdio" is the gernerical configuation compatible for the >>> default hisilicon chip, >>> We use generic hisilicon since our MDIO/PHY is same across flavour of >>> SoCs. >>> >> Hi Arnd, >> Yes, "hisilicon,mdio" exists for the legacy reasons to support older SoC >> Hip04. > I see. In that case, that compatible string should probably be mentioned > only as 'optional' in the binding, and not used for devices other than > hip04. > > Arnd > > . > Hi, Arnd ok, ill send a patch to specify it, please Ack then. thanks Daode.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/hisilicon-hns-mdio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/hisilicon-hns-mdio.txt index 9940aa0..9c23fdf 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/hisilicon-hns-mdio.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/hisilicon-hns-mdio.txt @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Example: mdio@803c0000 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; - compatible = "hisilicon,mdio","hisilicon,hns-mdio"; + compatible = "hisilicon,hns-mdio","hisilicon,mdio"; reg = <0x0 0x803c0000 0x0 0x10000>; ethernet-phy@0 { diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hip05_hns.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hip05_hns.dtsi index 3500586..606dd5a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hip05_hns.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hip05_hns.dtsi @@ -13,14 +13,12 @@ soc0: soc@000000000 { reg = <0x0 0x803c0000 0x0 0x10000 0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x10000>; - soc0_phy4: ethernet-phy@4 { + soc0_phy0: ethernet-phy@0 { reg = <0x0>; - device_type = "ethernet-phy"; compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22"; }; - soc0_phy5: ethernet-phy@5 { + soc0_phy1: ethernet-phy@1 { reg = <0x1>; - device_type = "ethernet-phy"; compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22"; }; }; @@ -37,7 +35,7 @@ soc0: soc@000000000 { 0x0 0xc7000000 0x0 0x60000 >; - phy-handle = <0 0 0 0 &soc0_phy4 &soc0_phy5 0 0>; + phy-handle = <0 0 0 0 &soc0_phy0 &soc0_phy1 0 0>; interrupts = < /* [14] ge fifo err 8 / xge 6**/ 149 0x4 150 0x4 151 0x4 152 0x4