Message ID | 1303420712-6369-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:18:16 +0100 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > Required so that we don't obliterate the queue if initialising the > rings after the global IRQ handler is installed. > > [Jesse, you recently looked at refactoring the IRQ installation > routines, does moving the initialisation of ring buffer data structures away > from that routine make sense in your grand scheme?] Yeah, this looks fine. It'll cause a trivial conflict with my split patch, but that's ok. Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index 188b497..46ccfc8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c @@ -1688,12 +1688,6 @@ int i915_driver_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev) u32 enable_mask = I915_INTERRUPT_ENABLE_FIX | I915_INTERRUPT_ENABLE_VAR; u32 error_mask; - DRM_INIT_WAITQUEUE(&dev_priv->ring[RCS].irq_queue); - if (HAS_BSD(dev)) - DRM_INIT_WAITQUEUE(&dev_priv->ring[VCS].irq_queue); - if (HAS_BLT(dev)) - DRM_INIT_WAITQUEUE(&dev_priv->ring[BCS].irq_queue); - dev_priv->vblank_pipe = DRM_I915_VBLANK_PIPE_A | DRM_I915_VBLANK_PIPE_B; if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index e9e6f71..884556d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -800,6 +800,7 @@ int intel_init_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev, INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ring->request_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ring->gpu_write_list); + init_waitqueue_head(&ring->irq_queue); spin_lock_init(&ring->irq_lock); ring->irq_mask = ~0;