| Message ID | alpine.LFD.2.00.1105041117170.24613@xanadu.home (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 4 May 2011 17:20, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, 4 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote: > >> On 4 May 2011 05:40, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, 3 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote: >> > >> >> From: Stefan Nilsson XK <stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com> >> >> >> >> If there is only 1 function registered, and IRQ:s are supported and >> >> currently enabled, call the callback handler directly >> >> without checking the CCCR registers. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Nilsson XK <stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org> >> > >> > Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> >> > >> I am working o a patch version 2 after offline discussion with Ulf Hansson. >> Instead of adding this code here. >> Add sdio_single_func member in mmc_card. Set and reset this function >> in sdio_claim_irq and sdio_release_irq. >> process_sdio_pending_irqs would only check if sdio_single_func is != >> null and call it. > > Yes, that's what I was about to propose after thinking about it some > more. > >> This will result in a bigger patch overall but the new code in >> process_sdio_pending_irqs will be minimal. > > Something like this (untested) ? > What I had in mind is similar. Please let me know what you think. I am about to post "patch v2" Regards, Per -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c index b300161..4552727 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c @@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ static int process_sdio_pending_irqs(struct mmc_card *card) int i, ret, count; unsigned char pending; + if (card->sdio_single_irq) { + struct sdio_func *func = card->sdio_single_irq; + func->irq_handler(func); + return 1; + } + ret = mmc_io_rw_direct(card, 0, 0, SDIO_CCCR_INTx, 0, &pending); if (ret) { printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: error %d reading SDIO_CCCR_INTx\n", @@ -166,6 +172,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_get(struct mmc_card *card) host->sdio_irqs--; return err; } + return 1; } return 0; @@ -183,7 +190,7 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_put(struct mmc_card *card) kthread_stop(host->sdio_irq_thread); } - return 0; + return (host->sdio_irqs == 1); } /** @@ -225,8 +232,12 @@ int sdio_claim_irq(struct sdio_func *func, sdio_irq_handler_t *handler) func->irq_handler = handler; ret = sdio_card_irq_get(func->card); - if (ret) + if (ret < 0) { func->irq_handler = NULL; + } else if (ret == 1) { + card->sdio_single_irq = func; + ret = 0; + } return ret; } @@ -250,7 +261,17 @@ int sdio_release_irq(struct sdio_func *func) if (func->irq_handler) { func->irq_handler = NULL; - sdio_card_irq_put(func->card); + if (sdio_card_irq_put(func->card) == 1) { + int i; + for (i = 0, i < 7; i++) { + if (func->card->sdio_func[i].irq_handler) { + func->card->sdio_single_irq = + func->card->sdio_func[i]; + break; + } + } + } else + func->card->sdio_single_irq = NULL; } ret = mmc_io_rw_direct(func->card, 0, 0, SDIO_CCCR_IENx, 0, ®); diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h index adb4888..fee3df3 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ struct mmc_card { struct sdio_cccr cccr; /* common card info */ struct sdio_cis cis; /* common tuple info */ struct sdio_func *sdio_func[SDIO_MAX_FUNCS]; /* SDIO functions (devices) */ + struct sdio_func *sdio_single_irq; /* SDIO function when only one IRQ active */ unsigned num_info; /* number of info strings */ const char **info; /* info strings */ struct sdio_func_tuple *tuples; /* unknown common tuples */