diff mbox

[RFC/PATCH] OMAP PM: remove OMAP_PM_NONE config option

Message ID 1304673087-24643-1-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Jean Pihet May 6, 2011, 9:11 a.m. UTC
The current code base is not linking with the OMAP_PM_NONE
option set.
Since the option OMAP_PM_NOOP provides a no-op/debug layer,
OMAP_PM_NONE can be removed.
OMAP_PM_NOOP is enabled by default by Kconfig.

Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig                |    3 ---
 arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap-pm.h |    8 --------
 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Comments

Jean Pihet May 6, 2011, 6:43 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Paul,

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> wrote:
> Salut Jean
>
> On Fri, 6 May 2011, Jean Pihet wrote:
>
>> The current code base is not linking with the OMAP_PM_NONE
>> option set.
>> Since the option OMAP_PM_NOOP provides a no-op/debug layer,
>> OMAP_PM_NONE can be removed.
>> OMAP_PM_NOOP is enabled by default by Kconfig.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
>
> I'm okay with this but could you please base it on v2.6.39-rc6 so I can
> merge it here?
I checked the patch against the master branch of both Tony's and
Linus's trees, it applies and compiles OK.
Is that OK to you?

Regards,
Jean

>
> thanks
>
>
> - Paul
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Paul Walmsley May 6, 2011, 8:07 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, 6 May 2011, Jean Pihet wrote:

> I checked the patch against the master branch of both Tony's and
> Linus's trees, it applies and compiles OK.
> Is that OK to you?

If it applies cleanly against Linus's current tree, then yes, that's fine.


- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jean Pihet June 20, 2011, 12:58 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Paul,

> On Fri, 6 May 2011, Jean Pihet wrote:
>
>> I checked the patch against the master branch of both Tony's and
>> Linus's trees, it applies and compiles OK.
>> Is that OK to you?
>
> If it applies cleanly against Linus's current tree, then yes, that's fine.
Do you know what happened to this patch? Is it scheduled for merging
into mainline?

>
>
> - Paul
>

Thanks,
Jean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Paul Walmsley July 9, 2011, 10:34 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Jean

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Jean Pihet wrote:

> > On Fri, 6 May 2011, Jean Pihet wrote:
> >
> >> I checked the patch against the master branch of both Tony's and
> >> Linus's trees, it applies and compiles OK.
> >> Is that OK to you?
> >
> > If it applies cleanly against Linus's current tree, then yes, that's fine.
> Do you know what happened to this patch? Is it scheduled for merging
> into mainline?

This patch has been queued for 3.1 at git://git.pwsan.com/linux-2.6 in the 
'omap_pm_cleanup_3.1' branch.

thanks,

- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig b/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig
index cd5f993..16e3293 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig
@@ -209,9 +209,6 @@  choice
 	depends on ARCH_OMAP
 	default OMAP_PM_NOOP
 
-config OMAP_PM_NONE
-	bool "No PM layer"
-
 config OMAP_PM_NOOP
 	bool "No-op/debug PM layer"
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap-pm.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap-pm.h
index c0a7520..0840df8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap-pm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap-pm.h
@@ -40,11 +40,7 @@ 
  * framework starts.  The "_if_" is to avoid name collisions with the
  * PM idle-loop code.
  */
-#ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NONE
-#define omap_pm_if_early_init() 0
-#else
 int __init omap_pm_if_early_init(void);
-#endif
 
 /**
  * omap_pm_if_init - OMAP PM init code called after clock fw init
@@ -52,11 +48,7 @@  int __init omap_pm_if_early_init(void);
  * The main initialization code.  OPP tables are passed in here.  The
  * "_if_" is to avoid name collisions with the PM idle-loop code.
  */
-#ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NONE
-#define omap_pm_if_init() 0
-#else
 int __init omap_pm_if_init(void);
-#endif
 
 /**
  * omap_pm_if_exit - OMAP PM exit code