Message ID | 1452459243-23739-1-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
On 10-01-16, 20:54, Mans Rullgard wrote: > Commit 61e183f83069 ("dmaengine/dw_dmac: Reconfigure interrupt and > chan_cfg register on resume") moved some channel initialisation to > a new function which must be called before starting a transfer. > > This adds the necessary dwc_initialize() call to dw_dma_cyclic_start() > which was missed in the original commit. > > Fixes: 61e183f83069 ("dmaengine/dw_dmac: Reconfigure interrupt and chan_cfg register on resume") > Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com> > --- > Andy, do you want to collect this with your other patches? It's trivial > enough that it can go in separately without conflicts too. > --- > drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw/core.c b/drivers/dma/dw/core.c > index 7067b6ddc1db..2917f75b67b4 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/dw/core.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw/core.c > @@ -1265,6 +1265,8 @@ int dw_dma_cyclic_start(struct dma_chan *chan) > return -EBUSY; > } > > + dwc_initialize(dwc); > + > dma_writel(dw, CLEAR.ERROR, dwc->mask); > dma_writel(dw, CLEAR.XFER, dwc->mask); Ahh, that's a very very old bug :( Okay, things got cleaned up by putting the dwc_initialize() call within dwc_dostart() and so it worked for all other DMA APIs. What about calling dwc_dostart() from within dw_dma_cyclic_start()? That will simplify it and remove code duplication issue as well.
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> writes: > On 10-01-16, 20:54, Mans Rullgard wrote: >> Commit 61e183f83069 ("dmaengine/dw_dmac: Reconfigure interrupt and >> chan_cfg register on resume") moved some channel initialisation to >> a new function which must be called before starting a transfer. >> >> This adds the necessary dwc_initialize() call to dw_dma_cyclic_start() >> which was missed in the original commit. >> >> Fixes: 61e183f83069 ("dmaengine/dw_dmac: Reconfigure interrupt and chan_cfg register on resume") >> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com> >> --- >> Andy, do you want to collect this with your other patches? It's trivial >> enough that it can go in separately without conflicts too. >> --- >> drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw/core.c b/drivers/dma/dw/core.c >> index 7067b6ddc1db..2917f75b67b4 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dma/dw/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw/core.c >> @@ -1265,6 +1265,8 @@ int dw_dma_cyclic_start(struct dma_chan *chan) >> return -EBUSY; >> } >> >> + dwc_initialize(dwc); >> + >> dma_writel(dw, CLEAR.ERROR, dwc->mask); >> dma_writel(dw, CLEAR.XFER, dwc->mask); > > Ahh, that's a very very old bug :( It's not the only one, I'm afraid. > Okay, things got cleaned up by putting the dwc_initialize() call > within dwc_dostart() and so it worked for all other DMA APIs. > > What about calling dwc_dostart() from within dw_dma_cyclic_start()? > That will simplify it and remove code duplication issue as well. Good idea. New patch coming up.
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw/core.c b/drivers/dma/dw/core.c index 7067b6ddc1db..2917f75b67b4 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dw/core.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dw/core.c @@ -1265,6 +1265,8 @@ int dw_dma_cyclic_start(struct dma_chan *chan) return -EBUSY; } + dwc_initialize(dwc); + dma_writel(dw, CLEAR.ERROR, dwc->mask); dma_writel(dw, CLEAR.XFER, dwc->mask);
Commit 61e183f83069 ("dmaengine/dw_dmac: Reconfigure interrupt and chan_cfg register on resume") moved some channel initialisation to a new function which must be called before starting a transfer. This adds the necessary dwc_initialize() call to dw_dma_cyclic_start() which was missed in the original commit. Fixes: 61e183f83069 ("dmaengine/dw_dmac: Reconfigure interrupt and chan_cfg register on resume") Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com> --- Andy, do you want to collect this with your other patches? It's trivial enough that it can go in separately without conflicts too. --- drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)