diff mbox

btrfs: async-thread: Fix a use-after-free error for trace

Message ID 1453426118-11198-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Qu Wenruo Jan. 22, 2016, 1:28 a.m. UTC
Parameter of trace_btrfs_work_queued() can be freed in its workqueue.
So no one use use that pointer after queue_work().

Fix the user-after-free bug by move the trace line before queue_work().

Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Chris Mason Jan. 22, 2016, 1:34 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 09:28:38AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Parameter of trace_btrfs_work_queued() can be freed in its workqueue.
> So no one use use that pointer after queue_work().
> 
> Fix the user-after-free bug by move the trace line before queue_work().
> 
> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
> index 88d9af3..5fb60ea 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
> @@ -328,8 +328,8 @@ static inline void __btrfs_queue_work(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq,
>  		list_add_tail(&work->ordered_list, &wq->ordered_list);
>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wq->list_lock, flags);
>  	}
> -	queue_work(wq->normal_wq, &work->normal_work);
>  	trace_btrfs_work_queued(work);
> +	queue_work(wq->normal_wq, &work->normal_work);
>  }

Thanks

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
David Sterba Jan. 22, 2016, 2:03 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 09:28:38AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Parameter of trace_btrfs_work_queued() can be freed in its workqueue.
> So no one use use that pointer after queue_work().
> 
> Fix the user-after-free bug by move the trace line before queue_work().
> 
> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
index 88d9af3..5fb60ea 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
@@ -328,8 +328,8 @@  static inline void __btrfs_queue_work(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq,
 		list_add_tail(&work->ordered_list, &wq->ordered_list);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wq->list_lock, flags);
 	}
-	queue_work(wq->normal_wq, &work->normal_work);
 	trace_btrfs_work_queued(work);
+	queue_work(wq->normal_wq, &work->normal_work);
 }
 
 void btrfs_queue_work(struct btrfs_workqueue *wq,