Message ID | 1454394031.2873.10.camel@linux (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 02/02/16 06:20, Dongli Zhang wrote: > While npo.copy and npo.meta are initialized in xenvif_rx_action, fields > such as npo.meta_prod are directly used later in xenvif_gop_skb without > being initialized first. Although the output of xenvif_rx_action is based > on the difference between new npo->meta_prod and old npo->meta_prod, it is > better to initialize them to 0 at the beginning. Fields that are omitted from an initializer are initialized to zero. So this patch is not needed. David > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > @@ -560,6 +560,10 @@ static void xenvif_rx_action(struct xenvif_queue *queue) > bool need_to_notify = false; > > struct netrx_pending_operations npo = { > + .copy_prod = 0, > + .copy_cons = 0, > + .meta_prod = 0, > + .meta_cons = 0, > .copy = queue->grant_copy_op, > .meta = queue->meta, > }; >
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c index 61b97c3..32f0fbd 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c @@ -560,6 +560,10 @@ static void xenvif_rx_action(struct xenvif_queue *queue) bool need_to_notify = false; struct netrx_pending_operations npo = { + .copy_prod = 0, + .copy_cons = 0, + .meta_prod = 0, + .meta_cons = 0, .copy = queue->grant_copy_op, .meta = queue->meta, };
While npo.copy and npo.meta are initialized in xenvif_rx_action, fields such as npo.meta_prod are directly used later in xenvif_gop_skb without being initialized first. Although the output of xenvif_rx_action is based on the difference between new npo->meta_prod and old npo->meta_prod, it is better to initialize them to 0 at the beginning. Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com> --- drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)