diff mbox

drm/i915: add sanity check for partial view creation

Message ID 1456765862-25589-1-git-send-email-matthew.auld@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Matthew Auld Feb. 29, 2016, 5:11 p.m. UTC
When binding pages for a partial view we should check that the offset +
size is valid relative to the size of the gem object.

Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Ville Syrjälä Feb. 29, 2016, 5:57 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 05:11:02PM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> When binding pages for a partial view we should check that the offset +
> size is valid relative to the size of the gem object.
> 
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index 49e4f26..a477bb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -3500,6 +3500,10 @@ intel_partial_pages(const struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
>  	struct sg_page_iter obj_sg_iter;
>  	int ret = -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	if (view->params.partial.offset + view->params.partial.size >
> +	    obj->pages->nents)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

It seems to me that if we hit this, there must a bug somewhere higher
up.

> +
>  	st = kmalloc(sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!st)
>  		goto err_st_alloc;
> -- 
> 2.4.3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Joonas Lahtinen March 2, 2016, 1:29 p.m. UTC | #2
On ma, 2016-02-29 at 17:11 +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> When binding pages for a partial view we should check that the offset +
> size is valid relative to the size of the gem object.
> 
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index 49e4f26..a477bb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -3500,6 +3500,10 @@ intel_partial_pages(const struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
>  	struct sg_page_iter obj_sg_iter;
>  	int ret = -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	if (view->params.partial.offset + view->params.partial.size >
> +	    obj->pages->nents)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
>  	st = kmalloc(sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!st)
>  		goto err_st_alloc;
Tvrtko Ursulin March 2, 2016, 1:33 p.m. UTC | #3
On 29/02/16 17:11, Matthew Auld wrote:
> When binding pages for a partial view we should check that the offset +
> size is valid relative to the size of the gem object.
>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index 49e4f26..a477bb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -3500,6 +3500,10 @@ intel_partial_pages(const struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
>   	struct sg_page_iter obj_sg_iter;
>   	int ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> +	if (view->params.partial.offset + view->params.partial.size >
> +	    obj->pages->nents)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +

obj->pages->nents is not guaranteed to be equal to number of pages but 
can be less than due sg entry coalescing.

I suggest replacing with a check against "obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT".

>   	st = kmalloc(sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!st)
>   		goto err_st_alloc;
>

Regards,

Tvrtko
Chris Wilson March 2, 2016, 1:35 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:29:12PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ma, 2016-02-29 at 17:11 +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > When binding pages for a partial view we should check that the offset +
> > size is valid relative to the size of the gem object.
> > 
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > index 49e4f26..a477bb2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > @@ -3500,6 +3500,10 @@ intel_partial_pages(const struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
> >  	struct sg_page_iter obj_sg_iter;
> >  	int ret = -ENOMEM;
> >  
> > +	if (view->params.partial.offset + view->params.partial.size >
> > +	    obj->pages->nents)
> > +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

Wrong. Tell me again what nents has to do with the object size?
-Chris
Joonas Lahtinen March 2, 2016, 1:37 p.m. UTC | #5
On ma, 2016-02-29 at 19:57 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 05:11:02PM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > 
> > When binding pages for a partial view we should check that the offset +
> > size is valid relative to the size of the gem object.
> > 
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > index 49e4f26..a477bb2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > @@ -3500,6 +3500,10 @@ intel_partial_pages(const struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
> >  	struct sg_page_iter obj_sg_iter;
> >  	int ret = -ENOMEM;
> >  
> > +	if (view->params.partial.offset + view->params.partial.size >
> > +	    obj->pages->nents)
> > +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> It seems to me that if we hit this, there must a bug somewhere higher
> up.
> 

Currently yes. This is in preparation of the more widespread support
for partial views and was chosen as a good get-to-know-GEM-code
candidate.

Regards, Joonas

> > 
> > +
> >  	st = kmalloc(sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!st)
> >  		goto err_st_alloc;
> > -- 
> > 2.4.3
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index 49e4f26..a477bb2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -3500,6 +3500,10 @@  intel_partial_pages(const struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
 	struct sg_page_iter obj_sg_iter;
 	int ret = -ENOMEM;
 
+	if (view->params.partial.offset + view->params.partial.size >
+	    obj->pages->nents)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
 	st = kmalloc(sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!st)
 		goto err_st_alloc;