diff mbox

[05/15] OMAP: GPIO: Make gpio_context part of gpio_bank structure

Message ID 1306247094-25372-6-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Tarun Kanti DebBarma May 24, 2011, 2:24 p.m. UTC
From: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>

gpio_context array, which is used to save gpio bank's context,
is used only for OMAP3 architecture.

Move gpio_context as part of gpio_bank structure so that
it can be specific to each gpio bank and can be used for
any OMAP architecture

TODO: extend the gpio save/restore context function for OMAP4
architecture. This is done in one of the next patches in this
series

Signed-off-by: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio_omap.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

Comments

Kevin Hilman May 25, 2011, 9:41 p.m. UTC | #1
Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com> writes:

> From: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
>
> gpio_context array, which is used to save gpio bank's context,
> is used only for OMAP3 architecture.
>
> Move gpio_context as part of gpio_bank structure so that
> it can be specific to each gpio bank and can be used for
> any OMAP architecture
>
> TODO: extend the gpio save/restore context function for OMAP4
> architecture. This is done in one of the next patches in this
> series
>
> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>

Looks good.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sanjeev Premi May 26, 2011, 9:58 a.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org 
> [mailto:linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of 
> DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 7:55 PM
> To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Hilman, Kevin; Shilimkar, Santosh; tony@atomide.com; 
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Varadarajan, Charulatha
> Subject: [PATCH 05/15] OMAP: GPIO: Make gpio_context part of 
> gpio_bank structure
> 
> From: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
> 
> gpio_context array, which is used to save gpio bank's context,
> is used only for OMAP3 architecture.
> 
> Move gpio_context as part of gpio_bank structure so that
> it can be specific to each gpio bank and can be used for
> any OMAP architecture
> 
> TODO: extend the gpio save/restore context function for OMAP4
> architecture. This is done in one of the next patches in this
> series

[sp] Should this TODO be part of commit?
     BTW, this is the last patch in the series.

~sanjeev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sanjeev Premi May 26, 2011, 9:59 a.m. UTC | #3
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Premi, Sanjeev 
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 3:29 PM
> To: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Hilman, Kevin; Shilimkar, Santosh; tony@atomide.com; 
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Varadarajan, Charulatha
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 05/15] OMAP: GPIO: Make gpio_context part 
> of gpio_bank structure
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org 
> > [mailto:linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of 
> > DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 7:55 PM
> > To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Hilman, Kevin; Shilimkar, Santosh; tony@atomide.com; 
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Varadarajan, Charulatha
> > Subject: [PATCH 05/15] OMAP: GPIO: Make gpio_context part of 
> > gpio_bank structure
> > 
> > From: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
> > 
> > gpio_context array, which is used to save gpio bank's context,
> > is used only for OMAP3 architecture.
> > 
> > Move gpio_context as part of gpio_bank structure so that
> > it can be specific to each gpio bank and can be used for
> > any OMAP architecture
> > 
> > TODO: extend the gpio save/restore context function for OMAP4
> > architecture. This is done in one of the next patches in this
> > series
> 
> [sp] Should this TODO be part of commit?
>      BTW, this is the last patch in the series.
> 

Sorry, mistake... This showed up last on my mailbox.
~sanjeev

> ~sanjeev
> --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
charu@ti.com May 26, 2011, 10:07 a.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 15:28, Premi, Sanjeev <premi@ti.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
>> [mailto:linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
>> DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 7:55 PM
>> To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Hilman, Kevin; Shilimkar, Santosh; tony@atomide.com;
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Varadarajan, Charulatha
>> Subject: [PATCH 05/15] OMAP: GPIO: Make gpio_context part of
>> gpio_bank structure
>>
>> From: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
>>
>> gpio_context array, which is used to save gpio bank's context,
>> is used only for OMAP3 architecture.
>>
>> Move gpio_context as part of gpio_bank structure so that
>> it can be specific to each gpio bank and can be used for
>> any OMAP architecture
>>
>> TODO: extend the gpio save/restore context function for OMAP4
>> architecture. This is done in one of the next patches in this
>> series
>
> [sp] Should this TODO be part of commit?

Probably this could be moved into diff section.

<<<snip>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio_omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio_omap.c
index 3f1c932..5673951 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio_omap.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio_omap.c
@@ -30,6 +30,19 @@ 
 
 static LIST_HEAD(omap_gpio_list);
 
+struct gpio_regs {
+	u32 irqenable1;
+	u32 irqenable2;
+	u32 wake_en;
+	u32 ctrl;
+	u32 oe;
+	u32 leveldetect0;
+	u32 leveldetect1;
+	u32 risingdetect;
+	u32 fallingdetect;
+	u32 dataout;
+};
+
 struct gpio_bank {
 	struct list_head node;
 	unsigned long pbase;
@@ -43,7 +56,7 @@  struct gpio_bank {
 #endif
 	u32 non_wakeup_gpios;
 	u32 enabled_non_wakeup_gpios;
-
+	struct gpio_regs context;
 	u32 saved_datain;
 	u32 saved_fallingdetect;
 	u32 saved_risingdetect;
@@ -66,23 +79,6 @@  struct gpio_bank {
 	struct omap_gpio_reg_offs *regs;
 };
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3
-struct omap3_gpio_regs {
-	u32 irqenable1;
-	u32 irqenable2;
-	u32 wake_en;
-	u32 ctrl;
-	u32 oe;
-	u32 leveldetect0;
-	u32 leveldetect1;
-	u32 risingdetect;
-	u32 fallingdetect;
-	u32 dataout;
-};
-
-static struct omap3_gpio_regs gpio_context[OMAP34XX_NR_GPIOS];
-#endif
-
 #define GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio) (gpio % bank->width)
 #define GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio) (1 << GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio))
 #define GPIO_MOD_CTRL_BIT	BIT(0)
@@ -1486,33 +1482,31 @@  void omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle(void)
 void omap_gpio_save_context(void)
 {
 	struct gpio_bank *bank;
-	int i = 0;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(bank, &omap_gpio_list, node) {
-		i++;
 
 		if (!bank->loses_context)
 			continue;
 
-		gpio_context[i].irqenable1 =
+		bank->context.irqenable1 =
 			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE1);
-		gpio_context[i].irqenable2 =
+		bank->context.irqenable2 =
 			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE2);
-		gpio_context[i].wake_en =
+		bank->context.wake_en =
 			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_WAKE_EN);
-		gpio_context[i].ctrl =
+		bank->context.ctrl =
 			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_CTRL);
-		gpio_context[i].oe =
+		bank->context.oe =
 			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_OE);
-		gpio_context[i].leveldetect0 =
+		bank->context.leveldetect0 =
 			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0);
-		gpio_context[i].leveldetect1 =
+		bank->context.leveldetect1 =
 			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1);
-		gpio_context[i].risingdetect =
+		bank->context.risingdetect =
 			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_RISINGDETECT);
-		gpio_context[i].fallingdetect =
+		bank->context.fallingdetect =
 			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_FALLINGDETECT);
-		gpio_context[i].dataout =
+		bank->context.dataout =
 			__raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_DATAOUT);
 	}
 }
@@ -1520,33 +1514,31 @@  void omap_gpio_save_context(void)
 void omap_gpio_restore_context(void)
 {
 	struct gpio_bank *bank;
-	int i = 0;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(bank, &omap_gpio_list, node) {
-		i++;
 
 		if (!bank->loses_context)
 			continue;
 
-		__raw_writel(gpio_context[i].irqenable1,
+		__raw_writel(bank->context.irqenable1,
 				bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE1);
-		__raw_writel(gpio_context[i].irqenable2,
+		__raw_writel(bank->context.irqenable2,
 				bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE2);
-		__raw_writel(gpio_context[i].wake_en,
+		__raw_writel(bank->context.wake_en,
 				bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_WAKE_EN);
-		__raw_writel(gpio_context[i].ctrl,
+		__raw_writel(bank->context.ctrl,
 				bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_CTRL);
-		__raw_writel(gpio_context[i].oe,
+		__raw_writel(bank->context.oe,
 				bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_OE);
-		__raw_writel(gpio_context[i].leveldetect0,
+		__raw_writel(bank->context.leveldetect0,
 				bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0);
-		__raw_writel(gpio_context[i].leveldetect1,
+		__raw_writel(bank->context.leveldetect1,
 				bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1);
-		__raw_writel(gpio_context[i].risingdetect,
+		__raw_writel(bank->context.risingdetect,
 				bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_RISINGDETECT);
-		__raw_writel(gpio_context[i].fallingdetect,
+		__raw_writel(bank->context.fallingdetect,
 				bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_FALLINGDETECT);
-		__raw_writel(gpio_context[i].dataout,
+		__raw_writel(bank->context.dataout,
 				bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_DATAOUT);
 	}
 }