diff mbox

[v2] OMAP: iovmm: fix SW flags passed by user

Message ID 1301083471-11284-1-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

omar ramirez March 25, 2011, 8:04 p.m. UTC
None

Comments

omar ramirez April 15, 2011, 3:49 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Hiroshi,

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@ti.com> wrote:
> Commit d038aee24dcd5a2a0d8547f5396f67ae9698ac8e
> "omap: iovmm: don't check 'da' to set IOVMF_DA_FIXED flag",
> changes iovmm to receive flags specified by user, however
> the upper 16 bits of the flags are wiped by iovmm itself.
>
> This fixes IOVMF_DA_FIXED flags from being lost, and lets the user
> map its desired "device addresses".
>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
> ---
>
> v2:
> Include missing reference (commit and name) to patch in
> description.

If no comments, could you ack this patch?

Regards,

Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tony Lindgren May 31, 2011, 10:14 a.m. UTC | #2
* Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com> [110418 00:03]:
> From: "ext Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] OMAP: iovmm: fix SW flags passed by user
> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:49:42 -0500
> 
> > Hi Hiroshi,
> > 
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@ti.com> wrote:
> >> Commit d038aee24dcd5a2a0d8547f5396f67ae9698ac8e
> >> "omap: iovmm: don't check 'da' to set IOVMF_DA_FIXED flag",
> >> changes iovmm to receive flags specified by user, however
> >> the upper 16 bits of the flags are wiped by iovmm itself.
> >>
> >> This fixes IOVMF_DA_FIXED flags from being lost, and lets the user
> >> map its desired "device addresses".
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> v2:
> >> Include missing reference (commit and name) to patch in
> >> description.
> > 
> > If no comments, could you ack this patch?
> 
> Tony, please put this in your queue too.

I take that as your ack, will queue into fixes.

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/iovmm.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/iovmm.h
index 32a2f6c..e992b96 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/iovmm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/iovmm.h
@@ -29,9 +29,6 @@  struct iovm_struct {
  * lower 16 bit is used for h/w and upper 16 bit is for s/w.
  */
 #define IOVMF_SW_SHIFT		16
-#define IOVMF_HW_SIZE		(1 << IOVMF_SW_SHIFT)
-#define IOVMF_HW_MASK		(IOVMF_HW_SIZE - 1)
-#define IOVMF_SW_MASK		(~IOVMF_HW_MASK)UL
 
 /*
  * iovma: h/w flags derived from cam and ram attribute
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c
index 51ef43e..83a37c5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c
@@ -648,7 +648,6 @@  u32 iommu_vmap(struct iommu *obj, u32 da, const struct sg_table *sgt,
 			return PTR_ERR(va);
 	}
 
-	flags &= IOVMF_HW_MASK;
 	flags |= IOVMF_DISCONT;
 	flags |= IOVMF_MMIO;
 
@@ -706,7 +705,6 @@  u32 iommu_vmalloc(struct iommu *obj, u32 da, size_t bytes, u32 flags)
 	if (!va)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	flags &= IOVMF_HW_MASK;
 	flags |= IOVMF_DISCONT;
 	flags |= IOVMF_ALLOC;
 
@@ -795,7 +793,6 @@  u32 iommu_kmap(struct iommu *obj, u32 da, u32 pa, size_t bytes,
 	if (!va)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	flags &= IOVMF_HW_MASK;
 	flags |= IOVMF_LINEAR;
 	flags |= IOVMF_MMIO;
 
@@ -853,7 +850,6 @@  u32 iommu_kmalloc(struct iommu *obj, u32 da, size_t bytes, u32 flags)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	pa = virt_to_phys(va);
 
-	flags &= IOVMF_HW_MASK;
 	flags |= IOVMF_LINEAR;
 	flags |= IOVMF_ALLOC;