| Message ID | 1459957147-10133-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:39:07PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > There is no reason to limit the TWD to be used on SMP kernels only if the > hardware has it available. > On Wandboard i.MX6SOLO, running PREEMPT-RT and cyclictest I see as max > immediately after start in idle: > UP : ~90us > SMP: ~50us > UP + TWD: ~20us. > Based on this numbers I prefer the TWD over the slightly slower MXC > timer. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Applied, thanks.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig index 8ceda2844c4f..08bcf8fb76f2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ config SOC_IMX6Q bool "i.MX6 Quad/DualLite support" select ARM_ERRATA_764369 if SMP select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP - select HAVE_ARM_TWD if SMP + select HAVE_ARM_TWD select PCI_DOMAINS if PCI select PINCTRL_IMX6Q select SOC_IMX6
There is no reason to limit the TWD to be used on SMP kernels only if the hardware has it available. On Wandboard i.MX6SOLO, running PREEMPT-RT and cyclictest I see as max immediately after start in idle: UP : ~90us SMP: ~50us UP + TWD: ~20us. Based on this numbers I prefer the TWD over the slightly slower MXC timer. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> --- arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)