Message ID | 1459769860-6629-7-git-send-email-julien.grall@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:37:37PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Fill up the recently introduced gic_kvm_info with the hardware > information used for virtualization. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> > > --- > Changes in v5: > - Remove the alignment check for GICV. It's already done in the > KVM code. > - Fix initialization of KVM with ACPI. > > Changes in v4: > - Change the flow to call gic_kvm_set_info only when all the > mandatory information are valid. > - Remove unecessary code in ACPI parsing (the virtual control > interface doesn't exist for GICv3). > - Rework commit message > - Rework the ACPI support as it didn't collect hardware info for > virtualization when there is more than 1 redistributor region > > Changes in v3: > - Add ACPI support > > Changes in v2: > - Use 0 rather than a negative value to know when the maintenance IRQ > is not present. > - Use resource for vcpu and vctrl > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > index 50e87e6..08afbfe 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <linux/irqchip.h> > +#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h> > #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h> > > #include <asm/cputype.h> > @@ -56,6 +57,8 @@ struct gic_chip_data { > static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly; > static struct static_key supports_deactivate = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE; > > +static struct gic_kvm_info gic_v3_kvm_info; > + > #define gic_data_rdist() (this_cpu_ptr(gic_data.rdists.rdist)) > #define gic_data_rdist_rd_base() (gic_data_rdist()->rd_base) > #define gic_data_rdist_sgi_base() (gic_data_rdist_rd_base() + SZ_64K) > @@ -901,6 +904,30 @@ static int __init gic_validate_dist_version(void __iomem *dist_base) > return 0; > } > > +static void __init gic_of_setup_kvm_info(struct device_node *node) > +{ > + int ret; > + struct resource r; > + u32 gicv_idx; > + > + gic_v3_kvm_info.type = GIC_V3; > + > + gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0); > + if (!gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq) > + return; > + > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "#redistributor-regions", > + &gicv_idx)) > + gicv_idx = 1; > + > + gicv_idx += 3; /* Also skip GICD, GICC, GICH */ > + ret = of_address_to_resource(node, gicv_idx, &r); > + if (!ret) > + gic_v3_kvm_info.vcpu = r; > + > + gic_set_kvm_info(&gic_v3_kvm_info); > +} > + > static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent) > { > void __iomem *dist_base; > @@ -952,8 +979,10 @@ static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *pare > > err = gic_init_bases(dist_base, rdist_regs, nr_redist_regions, > redist_stride, &node->fwnode); > - if (!err) > + if (!err) { > + gic_of_setup_kvm_info(node); > return 0; > + } > > out_unmap_rdist: > for (i = 0; i < nr_redist_regions; i++) > @@ -974,6 +1003,9 @@ static struct > struct redist_region *redist_regs; > u32 nr_redist_regions; > bool single_redist; > + u32 maint_irq; > + int maint_irq_mode; > + phys_addr_t vcpu_base; > } acpi_data __initdata; > > static void __init > @@ -1110,7 +1142,81 @@ static bool __init acpi_validate_gic_table(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, > return true; > } > > +static int __init gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, > + const unsigned long end) > +{ > + struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc = > + (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header; > + int maint_irq_mode; > + static int first_madt = true; > + > + maint_irq_mode = (gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_VGIC_IRQ_MODE) ? > + ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE : ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE; > + > + if (first_madt) { > + first_madt = false; > + > + acpi_data.maint_irq = gicc->vgic_interrupt; > + acpi_data.maint_irq_mode = maint_irq_mode; > + acpi_data.vcpu_base = gicc->gicv_base_address; > + > + return 0; > + } > + > + /* > + * The maintenance interrupt and GICV should be the same for every CPU > + */ > + if ((acpi_data.maint_irq != gicc->vgic_interrupt) || > + (acpi_data.maint_irq_mode != maint_irq_mode) || > + (acpi_data.vcpu_base != gicc->gicv_base_address)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static bool __init gic_acpi_collect_virt_info(void) > +{ > + int count; > + > + count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT, > + gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc, 0); > + > + return (count > 0); > +} > + > #define ACPI_GICV3_DIST_MEM_SIZE (SZ_64K) > +#define ACPI_GICV2_VCTRL_MEM_SIZE (SZ_4K) > +#define ACPI_GICV2_VCPU_MEM_SIZE (SZ_8K) > + > +static void __init gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(void) > +{ > + int irq; > + > + if (!gic_acpi_collect_virt_info()) { > + pr_warn("Unable to get hardware information used for virtualization\n"); perhaps this should say something about gicv3 as well? > + return; > + } > + > + gic_v3_kvm_info.type = GIC_V3; > + > + irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, acpi_data.maint_irq, > + acpi_data.maint_irq_mode, > + ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH); > + if (irq <= 0) > + return; > + > + gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq; > + > + if (acpi_data.vcpu_base) { > + struct resource *vcpu = &gic_v3_kvm_info.vcpu; > + > + vcpu->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; > + vcpu->start = acpi_data.vcpu_base; > + vcpu->end = vcpu->start + ACPI_GICV2_VCPU_MEM_SIZE - 1; > + } > + > + gic_set_kvm_info(&gic_v3_kvm_info); > +} > > static int __init > gic_acpi_init(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, const unsigned long end) > @@ -1159,6 +1265,8 @@ gic_acpi_init(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, const unsigned long end) > goto out_fwhandle_free; > > acpi_set_irq_model(ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC, domain_handle); > + gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(); > + > return 0; > > out_fwhandle_free: > diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h > index ef34f6f..c647b05 100644 > --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h > +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ > > enum gic_type { > GIC_V2, > + GIC_V3, > }; > > struct gic_kvm_info { > -- > 1.9.1 > Otherwise (with my extremely limited acpi understanding): Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Christoffer, On 06/04/2016 18:22, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:37:37PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> +static void __init gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(void) >> +{ >> + int irq; >> + >> + if (!gic_acpi_collect_virt_info()) { >> + pr_warn("Unable to get hardware information used for virtualization\n"); > > perhaps this should say something about gicv3 as well? Actually, none of the pr_* call contain GICv3 and there is no pr_fmt. I'm thinking to send a patch to add pr_fmt in the GICv3 driver. > > Otherwise (with my extremely limited acpi understanding): > > Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Thank you! Regards,
Hi Julien, On 04/04/2016 06:37 AM, Julien Grall wrote: > Fill up the recently introduced gic_kvm_info with the hardware > information used for virtualization. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> > > --- > Changes in v5: > - Remove the alignment check for GICV. It's already done in the > KVM code. > - Fix initialization of KVM with ACPI. > > Changes in v4: > - Change the flow to call gic_kvm_set_info only when all the > mandatory information are valid. > - Remove unecessary code in ACPI parsing (the virtual control > interface doesn't exist for GICv3). > - Rework commit message > - Rework the ACPI support as it didn't collect hardware info for > virtualization when there is more than 1 redistributor region > > Changes in v3: > - Add ACPI support > > Changes in v2: > - Use 0 rather than a negative value to know when the maintenance > IRQ > is not present. > - Use resource for vcpu and vctrl > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 110 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > index 50e87e6..08afbfe 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <linux/irqchip.h> > +#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h> > #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h> > > #include <asm/cputype.h> > @@ -56,6 +57,8 @@ struct gic_chip_data { > static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly; > static struct static_key supports_deactivate = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE; > > +static struct gic_kvm_info gic_v3_kvm_info; > + > #define gic_data_rdist() > (this_cpu_ptr(gic_data.rdists.rdist)) > #define gic_data_rdist_rd_base() (gic_data_rdist()->rd_base) > #define gic_data_rdist_sgi_base() (gic_data_rdist_rd_base() + > SZ_64K) > @@ -901,6 +904,30 @@ static int __init gic_validate_dist_version(void > __iomem *dist_base) > return 0; > } > > +static void __init gic_of_setup_kvm_info(struct device_node *node) > +{ > + int ret; > + struct resource r; > + u32 gicv_idx; > + > + gic_v3_kvm_info.type = GIC_V3; > + > + gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0); > + if (!gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq) > + return; > + > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "#redistributor-regions", > + &gicv_idx)) > + gicv_idx = 1; > + > + gicv_idx += 3; /* Also skip GICD, GICC, GICH */ > + ret = of_address_to_resource(node, gicv_idx, &r); > + if (!ret) > + gic_v3_kvm_info.vcpu = r; > + > + gic_set_kvm_info(&gic_v3_kvm_info); > +} > + > static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct > device_node *parent) > { > void __iomem *dist_base; > @@ -952,8 +979,10 @@ static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node > *node, struct device_node *pare > > err = gic_init_bases(dist_base, rdist_regs, nr_redist_regions, > redist_stride, &node->fwnode); > - if (!err) > + if (!err) { > + gic_of_setup_kvm_info(node); > return 0; > + } > > out_unmap_rdist: > for (i = 0; i < nr_redist_regions; i++) > @@ -974,6 +1003,9 @@ static struct > struct redist_region *redist_regs; > u32 nr_redist_regions; > bool single_redist; > + u32 maint_irq; > + int maint_irq_mode; > + phys_addr_t vcpu_base; > } acpi_data __initdata; > > static void __init > @@ -1110,7 +1142,81 @@ static bool __init acpi_validate_gic_table(struct > acpi_subtable_header *header, > return true; > } > > +static int __init gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc(struct > acpi_subtable_header *header, > + const unsigned long end) > +{ > + struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc = > + (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header; > + int maint_irq_mode; > + static int first_madt = true; > + > + maint_irq_mode = (gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_VGIC_IRQ_MODE) ? > + ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE : ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE; > + Do you think GICC parameters are valid for an unusable processor? If not we need a validation check here, some thing like this to skip GICC subtable entry. if (!(gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED)) return 0; > + if (first_madt) { > + first_madt = false; > + > + acpi_data.maint_irq = gicc->vgic_interrupt; > + acpi_data.maint_irq_mode = maint_irq_mode; > + acpi_data.vcpu_base = gicc->gicv_base_address; > + > + return 0; > + } > + > + /* > + * The maintenance interrupt and GICV should be the same for every > CPU > + */ > + if ((acpi_data.maint_irq != gicc->vgic_interrupt) || > + (acpi_data.maint_irq_mode != maint_irq_mode) || > + (acpi_data.vcpu_base != gicc->gicv_base_address)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static bool __init gic_acpi_collect_virt_info(void) > +{ > + int count; > + > + count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT, > + gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc, 0); > + > + return (count > 0); > +} > + > #define ACPI_GICV3_DIST_MEM_SIZE (SZ_64K) > +#define ACPI_GICV2_VCTRL_MEM_SIZE (SZ_4K) > +#define ACPI_GICV2_VCPU_MEM_SIZE (SZ_8K) > + > +static void __init gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(void) > +{ > + int irq; > + > + if (!gic_acpi_collect_virt_info()) { > + pr_warn("Unable to get hardware information used for > virtualization\n"); > + return; > + } > + > + gic_v3_kvm_info.type = GIC_V3; > + > + irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, acpi_data.maint_irq, > + acpi_data.maint_irq_mode, > + ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH); > + if (irq <= 0) > + return; > + > + gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq; > + > + if (acpi_data.vcpu_base) { > + struct resource *vcpu = &gic_v3_kvm_info.vcpu; > + > + vcpu->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; > + vcpu->start = acpi_data.vcpu_base; > + vcpu->end = vcpu->start + ACPI_GICV2_VCPU_MEM_SIZE - 1; > + } > + > + gic_set_kvm_info(&gic_v3_kvm_info); > +} > > static int __init > gic_acpi_init(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, const unsigned long > end) > @@ -1159,6 +1265,8 @@ gic_acpi_init(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, > const unsigned long end) > goto out_fwhandle_free; > > acpi_set_irq_model(ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC, domain_handle); > + gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(); > + > return 0; > > out_fwhandle_free: > diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h > b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h > index ef34f6f..c647b05 100644 > --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h > +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ > > enum gic_type { > GIC_V2, > + GIC_V3, > }; > > struct gic_kvm_info {
On 2016/4/4 19:37, Julien Grall wrote: > Fill up the recently introduced gic_kvm_info with the hardware > information used for virtualization. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> > > --- > Changes in v5: > - Remove the alignment check for GICV. It's already done in the > KVM code. > - Fix initialization of KVM with ACPI. > > Changes in v4: > - Change the flow to call gic_kvm_set_info only when all the > mandatory information are valid. > - Remove unecessary code in ACPI parsing (the virtual control > interface doesn't exist for GICv3). > - Rework commit message > - Rework the ACPI support as it didn't collect hardware info for > virtualization when there is more than 1 redistributor region > > Changes in v3: > - Add ACPI support > > Changes in v2: > - Use 0 rather than a negative value to know when the maintenance IRQ > is not present. > - Use resource for vcpu and vctrl > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > index 50e87e6..08afbfe 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <linux/irqchip.h> > +#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h> > #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h> > > #include <asm/cputype.h> > @@ -56,6 +57,8 @@ struct gic_chip_data { > static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly; > static struct static_key supports_deactivate = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE; > > +static struct gic_kvm_info gic_v3_kvm_info; > + > #define gic_data_rdist() (this_cpu_ptr(gic_data.rdists.rdist)) > #define gic_data_rdist_rd_base() (gic_data_rdist()->rd_base) > #define gic_data_rdist_sgi_base() (gic_data_rdist_rd_base() + SZ_64K) > @@ -901,6 +904,30 @@ static int __init gic_validate_dist_version(void __iomem *dist_base) > return 0; > } > > +static void __init gic_of_setup_kvm_info(struct device_node *node) > +{ > + int ret; > + struct resource r; > + u32 gicv_idx; > + > + gic_v3_kvm_info.type = GIC_V3; > + > + gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0); > + if (!gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq) > + return; > + > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "#redistributor-regions", > + &gicv_idx)) > + gicv_idx = 1; > + > + gicv_idx += 3; /* Also skip GICD, GICC, GICH */ > + ret = of_address_to_resource(node, gicv_idx, &r); > + if (!ret) > + gic_v3_kvm_info.vcpu = r; > + > + gic_set_kvm_info(&gic_v3_kvm_info); > +} > + > static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent) > { > void __iomem *dist_base; > @@ -952,8 +979,10 @@ static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *pare > > err = gic_init_bases(dist_base, rdist_regs, nr_redist_regions, > redist_stride, &node->fwnode); > - if (!err) > + if (!err) { > + gic_of_setup_kvm_info(node); > return 0; > + } > > out_unmap_rdist: > for (i = 0; i < nr_redist_regions; i++) > @@ -974,6 +1003,9 @@ static struct > struct redist_region *redist_regs; > u32 nr_redist_regions; > bool single_redist; > + u32 maint_irq; > + int maint_irq_mode; > + phys_addr_t vcpu_base; > } acpi_data __initdata; > > static void __init > @@ -1110,7 +1142,81 @@ static bool __init acpi_validate_gic_table(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, > return true; > } > > +static int __init gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, > + const unsigned long end) > +{ > + struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc = > + (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header; > + int maint_irq_mode; > + static int first_madt = true; > + > + maint_irq_mode = (gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_VGIC_IRQ_MODE) ? > + ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE : ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE; > + > + if (first_madt) { > + first_madt = false; > + > + acpi_data.maint_irq = gicc->vgic_interrupt; > + acpi_data.maint_irq_mode = maint_irq_mode; > + acpi_data.vcpu_base = gicc->gicv_base_address; > + > + return 0; > + } > + > + /* > + * The maintenance interrupt and GICV should be the same for every CPU > + */ > + if ((acpi_data.maint_irq != gicc->vgic_interrupt) || > + (acpi_data.maint_irq_mode != maint_irq_mode) || > + (acpi_data.vcpu_base != gicc->gicv_base_address)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static bool __init gic_acpi_collect_virt_info(void) > +{ > + int count; > + > + count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT, > + gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc, 0); > + > + return (count > 0); > +} > + > #define ACPI_GICV3_DIST_MEM_SIZE (SZ_64K) > +#define ACPI_GICV2_VCTRL_MEM_SIZE (SZ_4K) > +#define ACPI_GICV2_VCPU_MEM_SIZE (SZ_8K) > + > +static void __init gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(void) > +{ > + int irq; > + > + if (!gic_acpi_collect_virt_info()) { > + pr_warn("Unable to get hardware information used for virtualization\n"); > + return; > + } > + > + gic_v3_kvm_info.type = GIC_V3; > + > + irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, acpi_data.maint_irq, > + acpi_data.maint_irq_mode, > + ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH); > + if (irq <= 0) > + return; > + > + gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq; > + > + if (acpi_data.vcpu_base) { Sorry, I'm not familiar with KVM, but I got a question here, will KVM works without valid vcpu_base in GICv3 mode? Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 09/04/16 03:29, Shanker Donthineni wrote: > Hi Julien, Hello Shanker, > On 04/04/2016 06:37 AM, Julien Grall wrote: >> +static int __init gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc(struct >> acpi_subtable_header *header, >> + const unsigned long end) >> +{ >> + struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc = >> + (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header; >> + int maint_irq_mode; >> + static int first_madt = true; >> + >> + maint_irq_mode = (gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_VGIC_IRQ_MODE) ? >> + ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE : ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE; >> + > Do you think GICC parameters are valid for an unusable processor? Good point. We don't know if the value will be valid when the processor is unusable. > If not we need a validation check here, some thing like this to skip > GICC subtable entry. > > if (!(gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED)) > return 0; I will add this check. Regards,
Hello Hanjun, On 11/04/16 06:27, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2016/4/4 19:37, Julien Grall wrote: >> +static void __init gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(void) >> +{ >> + int irq; >> + >> + if (!gic_acpi_collect_virt_info()) { >> + pr_warn("Unable to get hardware information used for >> virtualization\n"); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + gic_v3_kvm_info.type = GIC_V3; >> + >> + irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, acpi_data.maint_irq, >> + acpi_data.maint_irq_mode, >> + ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH); >> + if (irq <= 0) >> + return; >> + >> + gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq; >> + >> + if (acpi_data.vcpu_base) { > > Sorry, I'm not familiar with KVM, but I got a question here, will > KVM works without valid vcpu_base in GICv3 mode? vcpu_base is only required for supporting GICv2 on GICv3. Regards,
Hi Julien, On 04/11/2016 09:27 AM, Julien Grall wrote: > Hello Hanjun, > > On 11/04/16 06:27, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> On 2016/4/4 19:37, Julien Grall wrote: >>> +static void __init gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(void) >>> +{ >>> + int irq; >>> + >>> + if (!gic_acpi_collect_virt_info()) { >>> + pr_warn("Unable to get hardware information used for >>> virtualization\n"); >>> + return; >>> + } >>> + >>> + gic_v3_kvm_info.type = GIC_V3; >>> + >>> + irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, acpi_data.maint_irq, >>> + acpi_data.maint_irq_mode, >>> + ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH); >>> + if (irq <= 0) >>> + return; >>> + >>> + gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq; >>> + >>> + if (acpi_data.vcpu_base) { >> >> Sorry, I'm not familiar with KVM, but I got a question here, will >> KVM works without valid vcpu_base in GICv3 mode? > Yes, KVM works without vcpu_base in GICv3 mode. The vcpu_base will be used for emulatingvGICv2 feature. The vGICv3 emulation isdone through the system registers. > vcpu_base is only required for supporting GICv2 on GICv3. > Yes, you are right, > Regards, >
Hi Shanker, Julien, On 2016/4/11 23:25, Shanker Donthineni wrote: > Hi Julien, > > On 04/11/2016 09:27 AM, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hello Hanjun, >> >> On 11/04/16 06:27, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>> On 2016/4/4 19:37, Julien Grall wrote: >>>> +static void __init gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(void) >>>> +{ >>>> + int irq; >>>> + >>>> + if (!gic_acpi_collect_virt_info()) { >>>> + pr_warn("Unable to get hardware information used for >>>> virtualization\n"); >>>> + return; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + gic_v3_kvm_info.type = GIC_V3; >>>> + >>>> + irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, acpi_data.maint_irq, >>>> + acpi_data.maint_irq_mode, >>>> + ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH); >>>> + if (irq <= 0) >>>> + return; >>>> + >>>> + gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq; >>>> + >>>> + if (acpi_data.vcpu_base) { >>> >>> Sorry, I'm not familiar with KVM, but I got a question here, will >>> KVM works without valid vcpu_base in GICv3 mode? >> > Yes, KVM works without vcpu_base in GICv3 mode. The vcpu_base will be used > for emulatingvGICv2 feature. The vGICv3 emulation isdone through the > system registers. > >> vcpu_base is only required for supporting GICv2 on GICv3. >> > Yes, you are right, Thanks for the clarify. Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c index 50e87e6..08afbfe 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/irqchip.h> +#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h> #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h> #include <asm/cputype.h> @@ -56,6 +57,8 @@ struct gic_chip_data { static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly; static struct static_key supports_deactivate = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE; +static struct gic_kvm_info gic_v3_kvm_info; + #define gic_data_rdist() (this_cpu_ptr(gic_data.rdists.rdist)) #define gic_data_rdist_rd_base() (gic_data_rdist()->rd_base) #define gic_data_rdist_sgi_base() (gic_data_rdist_rd_base() + SZ_64K) @@ -901,6 +904,30 @@ static int __init gic_validate_dist_version(void __iomem *dist_base) return 0; } +static void __init gic_of_setup_kvm_info(struct device_node *node) +{ + int ret; + struct resource r; + u32 gicv_idx; + + gic_v3_kvm_info.type = GIC_V3; + + gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0); + if (!gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq) + return; + + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "#redistributor-regions", + &gicv_idx)) + gicv_idx = 1; + + gicv_idx += 3; /* Also skip GICD, GICC, GICH */ + ret = of_address_to_resource(node, gicv_idx, &r); + if (!ret) + gic_v3_kvm_info.vcpu = r; + + gic_set_kvm_info(&gic_v3_kvm_info); +} + static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent) { void __iomem *dist_base; @@ -952,8 +979,10 @@ static int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *pare err = gic_init_bases(dist_base, rdist_regs, nr_redist_regions, redist_stride, &node->fwnode); - if (!err) + if (!err) { + gic_of_setup_kvm_info(node); return 0; + } out_unmap_rdist: for (i = 0; i < nr_redist_regions; i++) @@ -974,6 +1003,9 @@ static struct struct redist_region *redist_regs; u32 nr_redist_regions; bool single_redist; + u32 maint_irq; + int maint_irq_mode; + phys_addr_t vcpu_base; } acpi_data __initdata; static void __init @@ -1110,7 +1142,81 @@ static bool __init acpi_validate_gic_table(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, return true; } +static int __init gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, + const unsigned long end) +{ + struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc = + (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header; + int maint_irq_mode; + static int first_madt = true; + + maint_irq_mode = (gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_VGIC_IRQ_MODE) ? + ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE : ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE; + + if (first_madt) { + first_madt = false; + + acpi_data.maint_irq = gicc->vgic_interrupt; + acpi_data.maint_irq_mode = maint_irq_mode; + acpi_data.vcpu_base = gicc->gicv_base_address; + + return 0; + } + + /* + * The maintenance interrupt and GICV should be the same for every CPU + */ + if ((acpi_data.maint_irq != gicc->vgic_interrupt) || + (acpi_data.maint_irq_mode != maint_irq_mode) || + (acpi_data.vcpu_base != gicc->gicv_base_address)) + return -EINVAL; + + return 0; +} + +static bool __init gic_acpi_collect_virt_info(void) +{ + int count; + + count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT, + gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc, 0); + + return (count > 0); +} + #define ACPI_GICV3_DIST_MEM_SIZE (SZ_64K) +#define ACPI_GICV2_VCTRL_MEM_SIZE (SZ_4K) +#define ACPI_GICV2_VCPU_MEM_SIZE (SZ_8K) + +static void __init gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(void) +{ + int irq; + + if (!gic_acpi_collect_virt_info()) { + pr_warn("Unable to get hardware information used for virtualization\n"); + return; + } + + gic_v3_kvm_info.type = GIC_V3; + + irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, acpi_data.maint_irq, + acpi_data.maint_irq_mode, + ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH); + if (irq <= 0) + return; + + gic_v3_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq; + + if (acpi_data.vcpu_base) { + struct resource *vcpu = &gic_v3_kvm_info.vcpu; + + vcpu->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; + vcpu->start = acpi_data.vcpu_base; + vcpu->end = vcpu->start + ACPI_GICV2_VCPU_MEM_SIZE - 1; + } + + gic_set_kvm_info(&gic_v3_kvm_info); +} static int __init gic_acpi_init(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, const unsigned long end) @@ -1159,6 +1265,8 @@ gic_acpi_init(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, const unsigned long end) goto out_fwhandle_free; acpi_set_irq_model(ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC, domain_handle); + gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(); + return 0; out_fwhandle_free: diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h index ef34f6f..c647b05 100644 --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ enum gic_type { GIC_V2, + GIC_V3, }; struct gic_kvm_info {
Fill up the recently introduced gic_kvm_info with the hardware information used for virtualization. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> --- Changes in v5: - Remove the alignment check for GICV. It's already done in the KVM code. - Fix initialization of KVM with ACPI. Changes in v4: - Change the flow to call gic_kvm_set_info only when all the mandatory information are valid. - Remove unecessary code in ACPI parsing (the virtual control interface doesn't exist for GICv3). - Rework commit message - Rework the ACPI support as it didn't collect hardware info for virtualization when there is more than 1 redistributor region Changes in v3: - Add ACPI support Changes in v2: - Use 0 rather than a negative value to know when the maintenance IRQ is not present. - Use resource for vcpu and vctrl --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)