Message ID | 1464307708-4315-1-git-send-email-longli@microsoft.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, 05/26 17:08, Long Li wrote: > The block sector size should be in unit of 512 bytes, not in bytes. > > Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com> > > --- > drivers/scsi/sd.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c > index 428c03e..4bce17e 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c > @@ -2862,9 +2862,11 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk) > if (sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks && > sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= dev_max && > sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= SD_DEF_XFER_BLOCKS && > - sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) > - rw_max = q->limits.io_opt = > + sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) { > + q->limits.io_opt = > sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size; > + rw_max = (q->limits.io_opt >> 9); Other than the superfluous parenthesis, looks good to me. Fam > + } > else > rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS; > > -- > 1.8.5.6 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
dOn Thu, 2016-05-26 at 17:08 -0700, Long Li wrote: > The block sector size should be in unit of 512 bytes, not in bytes. Thanks. The patch subject should use something like: [PATCH] sd: Use the correct size to set block max sectors to show what subsystem is being modified. > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c [] > @@ -2862,9 +2862,11 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk) > if (sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks && > sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= dev_max && > sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= SD_DEF_XFER_BLOCKS && > - sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) > - rw_max = q->limits.io_opt = > + sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) { > + q->limits.io_opt = > sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size; > + rw_max = (q->limits.io_opt >> 9); > + } > else > rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS; And style trivia: it'd be more kernel style consistent as: if (... sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) { q->limits.io_opt = sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size; rw_max = q->limits.io_opt >> 9; } else { rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS; } ie: no parentheses necessary around the shifted value and braces around both arms. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 05/26/16 17:08, Long Li wrote: > The block sector size should be in unit of 512 bytes, not in bytes. > > Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com> > > --- > drivers/scsi/sd.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c > index 428c03e..4bce17e 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c > @@ -2862,9 +2862,11 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk) > if (sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks && > sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= dev_max && > sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= SD_DEF_XFER_BLOCKS && > - sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) > - rw_max = q->limits.io_opt = > + sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) { > + q->limits.io_opt = > sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size; > + rw_max = (q->limits.io_opt >> 9); > + } > else > rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS; Isn't this a duplicate of a patch Martin Petersen posted three weeks ago? See also http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi/113746. Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bart Van Assche [mailto:bart.vanassche@sandisk.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:19 PM > To: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>; James E.J. Bottomley > <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Martin K. Petersen > <martin.petersen@oracle.com> > Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use the correct size to set block max sectors > > On 05/26/16 17:08, Long Li wrote: > > The block sector size should be in unit of 512 bytes, not in bytes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com> > > > > --- > > drivers/scsi/sd.c | 6 ++++-- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c index > > 428c03e..4bce17e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c > > @@ -2862,9 +2862,11 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk) > > if (sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks && > > sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= dev_max && > > sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= SD_DEF_XFER_BLOCKS && > > - sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) > > - rw_max = q->limits.io_opt = > > + sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) { > > + q->limits.io_opt = > > sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size; > > + rw_max = (q->limits.io_opt >> 9); > > + } > > else > > rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS; > > Isn't this a duplicate of a patch Martin Petersen posted three weeks ago? See > also > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fthread.g > mane.org%2fgmane.linux.scsi%2f113746&data=01%7c01%7clongli%40micros > oft.com%7c4396718e6f9749d178bf08d385d53bba%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2 > d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=UpiYwEdYMtqcwuNS1llVuXcQ6riFT3b5%2b44Sn56 > Bl14%3d. > > Bart. > > Yes, this has been fixed in that patch. Please drop this one. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>> "Long" == Long Li <longli@microsoft.com> writes:
Long,
Long> Yes, this has been fixed in that patch.
I'd like to get my patch into scsi-fixes but it needs another set of
eyes. Would you mind either testing or reviewing it?
Thanks!
Hi Martin, Yes I would like to test it. Please let me know when they get in there. Thanks Long > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin K. Petersen [mailto:martin.petersen@oracle.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 7:44 PM > To: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com> > Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>; James E.J. Bottomley > <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Martin K. Petersen > <martin.petersen@oracle.com>; KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>; linux- > scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use the correct size to set block max sectors > > >>>>> "Long" == Long Li <longli@microsoft.com> writes: > > Long, > > Long> Yes, this has been fixed in that patch. > > I'd like to get my patch into scsi-fixes but it needs another set of eyes. Would > you mind either testing or reviewing it? > > Thanks! > > -- > Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c index 428c03e..4bce17e 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c @@ -2862,9 +2862,11 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk) if (sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks && sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= dev_max && sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= SD_DEF_XFER_BLOCKS && - sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) - rw_max = q->limits.io_opt = + sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) { + q->limits.io_opt = sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size; + rw_max = (q->limits.io_opt >> 9); + } else rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS;
The block sector size should be in unit of 512 bytes, not in bytes. Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com> --- drivers/scsi/sd.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)