| Message ID | 1464369565-12259-5-git-send-email-kieran@bingham.xyz (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Headers | show |
Hi Kieran, On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Kieran Bingham <kieran@ksquared.org.uk> wrote: > The example misses the power-domains usage, and documentation that the > property is used by the node. > > Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran@bingham.xyz> Thanks for your patch! > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt > index 1c0718b501ef..464bb7ae4b92 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ are paired with. These DT bindings currently support the FCPV and FCPF. > > - reg: the register base and size for the device registers > - clocks: Reference to the functional clock > + - power-domains : power-domain property defined with a phandle > + to respective power domain. I'd write "power domain specifier" instead of "phandle". While SYSC on R-Car Gen3 uses #power-domain-cells = 0, the FCP module may show up on another SoC that uses a different value, needing more than just a phandle. In fact I'm inclined to leave out the power-domains property completely: it's not a feature of the FCP, but of the SoC the FCP is part of. power-domains properties may appear in any device node where needed. > Device node example > @@ -30,4 +32,5 @@ Device node example > compatible = "renesas,r8a7795-fcpv", "renesas,fcpv"; > reg = <0 0xfea2f000 0 0x200>; > clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 602>; > + power-domains = <&sysc R8A7795_PD_A3VP>; Adding it to the example doesn't hurt, though. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Hi Geert, On 28/05/16 20:03, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Kieran, > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Kieran Bingham <kieran@ksquared.org.uk> wrote: >> The example misses the power-domains usage, and documentation that the >> property is used by the node. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran@bingham.xyz> > > Thanks for your patch! > >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt >> index 1c0718b501ef..464bb7ae4b92 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt >> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ are paired with. These DT bindings currently support the FCPV and FCPF. >> >> - reg: the register base and size for the device registers >> - clocks: Reference to the functional clock >> + - power-domains : power-domain property defined with a phandle >> + to respective power domain. > > I'd write "power domain specifier" instead of "phandle". While SYSC on R-Car > Gen3 uses #power-domain-cells = 0, the FCP module may show up on another > SoC that uses a different value, needing more than just a phandle. > > In fact I'm inclined to leave out the power-domains property completely: > it's not a feature of the FCP, but of the SoC the FCP is part of. > power-domains properties may appear in any device node where needed. I'm happy to just drop this part. It was mainly the addition to the example I was after, as I had followed the example, and thus missed the power-domain setting. >> Device node example >> @@ -30,4 +32,5 @@ Device node example >> compatible = "renesas,r8a7795-fcpv", "renesas,fcpv"; >> reg = <0 0xfea2f000 0 0x200>; >> clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 602>; >> + power-domains = <&sysc R8A7795_PD_A3VP>; > > Adding it to the example doesn't hurt, though. Ok, I'll adjust and just keep the example in v2.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt index 1c0718b501ef..464bb7ae4b92 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ are paired with. These DT bindings currently support the FCPV and FCPF. - reg: the register base and size for the device registers - clocks: Reference to the functional clock + - power-domains : power-domain property defined with a phandle + to respective power domain. Device node example @@ -30,4 +32,5 @@ Device node example compatible = "renesas,r8a7795-fcpv", "renesas,fcpv"; reg = <0 0xfea2f000 0 0x200>; clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 602>; + power-domains = <&sysc R8A7795_PD_A3VP>; };
The example misses the power-domains usage, and documentation that the property is used by the node. Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran@bingham.xyz> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/renesas,fcp.txt | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)