Message ID | e315008b5e9dc3f1490507508fd2f6e94767dfbb.1464130597.git.hramrach@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 07:25:24PM -0000, Michal Suchanek wrote: > When testing SPI without DMA I noticed that filling the FIFO on the > spi controller causes timeout. > > Always leave room for one byte in the FIFO. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com> Sending it to stable would be great (with a fixes tag too). > > --- > v2: > use EMSGSIZE instead of EINVAL > --- > drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c > index fe63bbd..04f1b77 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c > @@ -180,7 +180,9 @@ static int sun4i_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, > > /* We don't support transfer larger than the FIFO */ > if (tfr->len > SUN4I_FIFO_DEPTH) > - return -EINVAL; > + return -EMSGSIZE; One new line here. > + if (tfr->tx_buf && tfr->len >= SUN4I_FIFO_DEPTH) > + return -EMSGSIZE; > > reinit_completion(&sspi->done); > sspi->tx_buf = tfr->tx_buf; > @@ -271,7 +273,9 @@ static int sun4i_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, > sun4i_spi_write(sspi, SUN4I_XMIT_CNT_REG, SUN4I_XMIT_CNT(tx_len)); > > /* Fill the TX FIFO */ > - sun4i_spi_fill_fifo(sspi, SUN4I_FIFO_DEPTH); > + /* Filling the FIFO fully causes timeout for some reason > + * at least on spi2 on A10s */ This is not the proper comment style and generate a warning with checkpatch, please fix that (and merge the comment with the previous comment). Thanks! Maxime
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c index fe63bbd..04f1b77 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c @@ -180,7 +180,9 @@ static int sun4i_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, /* We don't support transfer larger than the FIFO */ if (tfr->len > SUN4I_FIFO_DEPTH) - return -EINVAL; + return -EMSGSIZE; + if (tfr->tx_buf && tfr->len >= SUN4I_FIFO_DEPTH) + return -EMSGSIZE; reinit_completion(&sspi->done); sspi->tx_buf = tfr->tx_buf; @@ -271,7 +273,9 @@ static int sun4i_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, sun4i_spi_write(sspi, SUN4I_XMIT_CNT_REG, SUN4I_XMIT_CNT(tx_len)); /* Fill the TX FIFO */ - sun4i_spi_fill_fifo(sspi, SUN4I_FIFO_DEPTH); + /* Filling the FIFO fully causes timeout for some reason + * at least on spi2 on A10s */ + sun4i_spi_fill_fifo(sspi, SUN4I_FIFO_DEPTH - 1); /* Enable the interrupts */ sun4i_spi_write(sspi, SUN4I_INT_CTL_REG, SUN4I_INT_CTL_TC);
When testing SPI without DMA I noticed that filling the FIFO on the spi controller causes timeout. Always leave room for one byte in the FIFO. Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com> --- v2: use EMSGSIZE instead of EINVAL --- drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)