diff mbox

[V8,9/9] pci, acpi: ARM64 support for ACPI based generic PCI host controller

Message ID 1464621262-26770-10-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Tomasz Nowicki May 30, 2016, 3:14 p.m. UTC
This patch implements pci_acpi_scan_root call so that ARM64 can start
using ACPI to setup and enumerate PCI buses.

The implementation of pci_acpi_scan_root() looks up config space regions
through MCFG interface. Then ECAM library is doing a new mapping
and attach generic ECAM ops which are used for accessing config space.

On ARM64, ACPI and DT can be enabled together, and in that case
we need to use generic domains. In order to do that we implement
ARM64 specific way of retrieving domain number from pci_config_window
structure.

Since we enable PCI for ACPI we need to implement raw_pci_{read|write}
at the same time. ARM64 provides RAW accessors as long as there is
correlated valid pci_bus structure, but not before.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Signed-off-by: Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com>
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig      |   2 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/pci.h     |   5 ++
 3 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann May 30, 2016, 3:38 p.m. UTC | #1
On Monday, May 30, 2016 5:14:22 PM CEST Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> +       bsz = 1 << pci_generic_ecam_ops.bus_shift;
> +       cfgres.start = root->mcfg_addr + bus_res->start * bsz;
> +       cfgres.end = cfgres.start + resource_size(bus_res) * bsz - 1;
> +       cfgres.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> +       cfg = pci_ecam_create(&root->device->dev, &cfgres, bus_res,
> +                             &pci_generic_ecam_ops);
> +       if (IS_ERR(cfg)) {
> +               pr_err("%04x:%pR error %ld mapping CAM\n", seg, bus_res,
> +                      PTR_ERR(cfg));
> +               return PTR_ERR(cfg);
> +       }
> +
> +       ri->cfg = cfg;
> +       return 0;
> +}

I wonder if we could do this a little simpler and just put a pointer
to the mmconfig space into struct pci_host_bridge, and then have a trivial
map_bus function alongside pci_generic_config_read/pci_generic_config_write.

As this code is specific to arch/arm64, we don't need any of the complexity
of drivers/pci/ecam.c, which basically only exists to work around the
limited virtual address space of 32-bit machines.

	Arnd
Jayachandran C. May 30, 2016, 4:13 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Monday, May 30, 2016 5:14:22 PM CEST Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>> +       bsz = 1 << pci_generic_ecam_ops.bus_shift;
>> +       cfgres.start = root->mcfg_addr + bus_res->start * bsz;
>> +       cfgres.end = cfgres.start + resource_size(bus_res) * bsz - 1;
>> +       cfgres.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
>> +       cfg = pci_ecam_create(&root->device->dev, &cfgres, bus_res,
>> +                             &pci_generic_ecam_ops);
>> +       if (IS_ERR(cfg)) {
>> +               pr_err("%04x:%pR error %ld mapping CAM\n", seg, bus_res,
>> +                      PTR_ERR(cfg));
>> +               return PTR_ERR(cfg);
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       ri->cfg = cfg;
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>
> I wonder if we could do this a little simpler and just put a pointer
> to the mmconfig space into struct pci_host_bridge, and then have a trivial
> map_bus function alongside pci_generic_config_read/pci_generic_config_write.
>
> As this code is specific to arch/arm64, we don't need any of the complexity
> of drivers/pci/ecam.c, which basically only exists to work around the
> limited virtual address space of 32-bit machines.

The map_bus provided by pci-ecam.h is already trivial in 64bit case,
it was written so that it could be optimized at compile time. The
pci_ecam_create is a useful to have here instead of redoing the
request_resource/ioremap sequence.

The struct pci_config_window can be moved into struct
pci_host_bridge (or a wrapper of pci_host_bridge) when we have
the setup to point bus->sysdata to something like that. The ECAM
API can be fixed up to handle that case as well. I did not make
any changes since the pci_host_bridge discussion is still going on.

JC.
Lorenzo Pieralisi June 2, 2016, 9:35 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> This patch implements pci_acpi_scan_root call so that ARM64 can start
> using ACPI to setup and enumerate PCI buses.
> 
> The implementation of pci_acpi_scan_root() looks up config space regions
> through MCFG interface. Then ECAM library is doing a new mapping
> and attach generic ECAM ops which are used for accessing config space.
> 
> On ARM64, ACPI and DT can be enabled together, and in that case
> we need to use generic domains. In order to do that we implement
> ARM64 specific way of retrieving domain number from pci_config_window
> structure.
> 
> Since we enable PCI for ACPI we need to implement raw_pci_{read|write}
> at the same time. ARM64 provides RAW accessors as long as there is
> correlated valid pci_bus structure, but not before.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com>

[...]

> +/* release_info: free resrouces allocated by init_info */

Nit: s/resrouces/resources

> +static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri;
> +
> +	ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common);
> +	pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg);
> +	kfree(ri);
> +}
> +
> +static struct acpi_pci_root_ops acpi_pci_root_ops = {
> +	.release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info,
> +};
> +
> +/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */
>  struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>  {
> -	/* TODO: Should be revisited when implementing PCI on ACPI */
> -	return NULL;
> +	int node = acpi_get_node(root->device->handle);
> +	struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri;
> +	struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	ri = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL, node);
> +	if (!ri)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	err = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root, ri);
> +	if (err)
> +		return NULL;
                ^
Leaking memory -> kfree(ri)

> +	acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops;
> +	bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, &ri->common,
> +				   ri->cfg);
> +	if (!bus)
> +		return NULL;

Ditto.

> +
> +	pci_bus_size_bridges(bus);
> +	pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
> +		pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
> +
> +	return bus;
>  }
>  
>  void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 9661c85..f66d188 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1390,7 +1390,12 @@ static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
>  {
>  	return bus->domain_nr;
>  }
> +/* Arch specific ACPI hook to set-up domain number */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus);

Technically speaking, this should be introduced in a separate patch;
given that I know it is a temporary plaster and no other architecture will
have to implement it I reckon it is fine to leave it here, I will make
it disappear as fast as I can.

We can argue if it is best to move the ACPI bits into a separate file
(acpi-pci.c), I am fine with keeping DT/ACPI in one file if that's fine
with Catalin and Will.

You can send the fix-ups above in the final pull request which I hope
is nigh.

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

> +#else
>  static inline int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return -1; }
> +#endif
>  void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent);
>  #else
>  static inline void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus,
Tomasz Nowicki June 2, 2016, 9:44 a.m. UTC | #4
On 02.06.2016 11:35, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>> This patch implements pci_acpi_scan_root call so that ARM64 can start
>> using ACPI to setup and enumerate PCI buses.
>>
>> The implementation of pci_acpi_scan_root() looks up config space regions
>> through MCFG interface. Then ECAM library is doing a new mapping
>> and attach generic ECAM ops which are used for accessing config space.
>>
>> On ARM64, ACPI and DT can be enabled together, and in that case
>> we need to use generic domains. In order to do that we implement
>> ARM64 specific way of retrieving domain number from pci_config_window
>> structure.
>>
>> Since we enable PCI for ACPI we need to implement raw_pci_{read|write}
>> at the same time. ARM64 provides RAW accessors as long as there is
>> correlated valid pci_bus structure, but not before.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com>
>
> [...]
>
>> +/* release_info: free resrouces allocated by init_info */
>
> Nit: s/resrouces/resources
>
>> +static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
>> +{
>> +	struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri;
>> +
>> +	ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common);
>> +	pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg);
>> +	kfree(ri);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct acpi_pci_root_ops acpi_pci_root_ops = {
>> +	.release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */
>>   struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>>   {
>> -	/* TODO: Should be revisited when implementing PCI on ACPI */
>> -	return NULL;
>> +	int node = acpi_get_node(root->device->handle);
>> +	struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri;
>> +	struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	ri = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL, node);
>> +	if (!ri)
>> +		return NULL;
>> +
>> +	err = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root, ri);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		return NULL;
>                  ^
> Leaking memory -> kfree(ri)

I missed that. Will fix.

>
>> +	acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops;
>> +	bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, &ri->common,
>> +				   ri->cfg);
>> +	if (!bus)
>> +		return NULL;
>
> Ditto.

Here kfree(ri) is not needed. __acpi_pci_root_release_info will free ri 
inside of acpi_pci_root_create.

>
>> +
>> +	pci_bus_size_bridges(bus);
>> +	pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
>> +		pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
>> +
>> +	return bus;
>>   }
>>
>>   void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index 9661c85..f66d188 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> @@ -1390,7 +1390,12 @@ static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
>>   {
>>   	return bus->domain_nr;
>>   }
>> +/* Arch specific ACPI hook to set-up domain number */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> +int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus);
>
> Technically speaking, this should be introduced in a separate patch;
> given that I know it is a temporary plaster and no other architecture will
> have to implement it I reckon it is fine to leave it here, I will make
> it disappear as fast as I can.
>
> We can argue if it is best to move the ACPI bits into a separate file
> (acpi-pci.c), I am fine with keeping DT/ACPI in one file if that's fine
> with Catalin and Will.
>
> You can send the fix-ups above in the final pull request which I hope
> is nigh.
>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

Thanks,
Tomasz
Bjorn Helgaas June 8, 2016, 2:14 a.m. UTC | #5
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> This patch implements pci_acpi_scan_root call so that ARM64 can start
> using ACPI to setup and enumerate PCI buses.
> 
> The implementation of pci_acpi_scan_root() looks up config space regions
> through MCFG interface. Then ECAM library is doing a new mapping
> and attach generic ECAM ops which are used for accessing config space.
> 
> On ARM64, ACPI and DT can be enabled together, and in that case
> we need to use generic domains. In order to do that we implement
> ARM64 specific way of retrieving domain number from pci_config_window
> structure.
> 
> Since we enable PCI for ACPI we need to implement raw_pci_{read|write}
> at the same time. ARM64 provides RAW accessors as long as there is
> correlated valid pci_bus structure, but not before.

I think this is important and needs to be spelled out a little more
explicitly using the terms from the ACPI spec so it will make sense to
people like BIOS writers who might be bitten by this.

"raw_pci_read()" is a Linux term that won't mean anything to them.
But they might expect that AML can access PCI config space before the
Linux driver claims the host bridge, and I think you're saying that
will not work.

> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig      |   2 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/pci.h     |   5 ++
>  3 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 76747d9..87c48ad 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ config ARM64
>  	select ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED if ACPI
>  	select ACPI_GENERIC_GSI if ACPI
>  	select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI
> +	select ACPI_MCFG if ACPI
>  	select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
>  	select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
>  	select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE
> @@ -96,6 +97,7 @@ config ARM64
>  	select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE
>  	select OF_NUMA if NUMA && OF
>  	select OF_RESERVED_MEM
> +	select PCI_ECAM if ACPI
>  	select PERF_USE_VMALLOC
>  	select POWER_RESET
>  	select POWER_SUPPLY
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> index 3663be1..39f2a40 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/of_pci.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  
>  /*
> @@ -71,13 +73,21 @@ int pcibios_alloc_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
>  		  unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val)
>  {
> -	return -ENXIO;
> +	struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus);
> +
> +	if (!b)
> +		return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> +	return b->ops->read(b, devfn, reg, len, val);
>  }
>  
>  int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
>  		unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val)
>  {
> -	return -ENXIO;
> +	struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus);
> +
> +	if (!b)
> +		return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> +	return b->ops->write(b, devfn, reg, len, val);
>  }

I think these functions could be under #ifdef ACPI, couldn't they?
I see x86 and ia64 don't do that, and they do call them from non-ACPI
places.  So maybe there'd be no point in doing it differently here.

You could split this out into a separate patch, though, which would be
a nice way to highlight the issue of AML access before pci_root.c
claims the bridge.

>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> @@ -91,11 +101,111 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibus_to_node);
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> -/* Root bridge scanning */
> +
> +struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info {
> +	struct acpi_pci_root_info	common;
> +	struct pci_config_window	*cfg;	/* config space mapping */
> +};
> +
> +int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +{
> +	struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata;
> +	struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent);
> +	struct acpi_pci_root *root = acpi_driver_data(adev);
> +
> +	return root->segment;
> +}
> +
> +int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> +	if (!acpi_disabled) {
> +		struct pci_config_window *cfg = bridge->bus->sysdata;
> +		struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent);
> +		ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, adev);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space
> + * mapping.
> + */
> +static int pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
> +				       struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri)

Maybe return the "struct pci_config_window *" and do the assignment in
the caller?  Then I don't think you'd have to pass in "ri".

> +{
> +	struct resource *bus_res = &root->secondary;
> +	u16 seg = root->segment;
> +	struct pci_config_window *cfg;
> +	struct resource cfgres;
> +	unsigned int bsz;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	err = pci_mcfg_lookup(root);
> +	if (err) {
> +		pr_err("%04x:%pR MCFG region not found\n", seg, bus_res);

dev_err()

> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	bsz = 1 << pci_generic_ecam_ops.bus_shift;
> +	cfgres.start = root->mcfg_addr + bus_res->start * bsz;
> +	cfgres.end = cfgres.start + resource_size(bus_res) * bsz - 1;
> +	cfgres.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> +	cfg = pci_ecam_create(&root->device->dev, &cfgres, bus_res,
> +			      &pci_generic_ecam_ops);
> +	if (IS_ERR(cfg)) {
> +		pr_err("%04x:%pR error %ld mapping CAM\n", seg, bus_res,
> +		       PTR_ERR(cfg));

dev_err()

> +		return PTR_ERR(cfg);
> +	}
> +
> +	ri->cfg = cfg;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* release_info: free resrouces allocated by init_info */
> +static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri;
> +
> +	ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common);
> +	pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg);
> +	kfree(ri);
> +}
> +
> +static struct acpi_pci_root_ops acpi_pci_root_ops = {
> +	.release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info,
> +};
> +
> +/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */
>  struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>  {
> -	/* TODO: Should be revisited when implementing PCI on ACPI */
> -	return NULL;
> +	int node = acpi_get_node(root->device->handle);
> +	struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri;
> +	struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	ri = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL, node);
> +	if (!ri)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	err = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root, ri);
> +	if (err)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops;
> +	bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, &ri->common,
> +				   ri->cfg);
> +	if (!bus)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	pci_bus_size_bridges(bus);
> +	pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
> +		pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
> +
> +	return bus;
>  }
>  
>  void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 9661c85..f66d188 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1390,7 +1390,12 @@ static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
>  {
>  	return bus->domain_nr;
>  }
> +/* Arch specific ACPI hook to set-up domain number */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus);
> +#else
>  static inline int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return -1; }
> +#endif
>  void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent);
>  #else
>  static inline void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus,
> -- 
> 1.9.1
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 76747d9..87c48ad 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@  config ARM64
 	select ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED if ACPI
 	select ACPI_GENERIC_GSI if ACPI
 	select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI
+	select ACPI_MCFG if ACPI
 	select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
 	select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
 	select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE
@@ -96,6 +97,7 @@  config ARM64
 	select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE
 	select OF_NUMA if NUMA && OF
 	select OF_RESERVED_MEM
+	select PCI_ECAM if ACPI
 	select PERF_USE_VMALLOC
 	select POWER_RESET
 	select POWER_SUPPLY
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
index 3663be1..39f2a40 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
@@ -17,7 +17,9 @@ 
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/of_pci.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
+#include <linux/pci-ecam.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
 /*
@@ -71,13 +73,21 @@  int pcibios_alloc_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
 int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
 		  unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val)
 {
-	return -ENXIO;
+	struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus);
+
+	if (!b)
+		return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
+	return b->ops->read(b, devfn, reg, len, val);
 }
 
 int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus,
 		unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val)
 {
-	return -ENXIO;
+	struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus);
+
+	if (!b)
+		return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
+	return b->ops->write(b, devfn, reg, len, val);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
@@ -91,11 +101,111 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibus_to_node);
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-/* Root bridge scanning */
+
+struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info {
+	struct acpi_pci_root_info	common;
+	struct pci_config_window	*cfg;	/* config space mapping */
+};
+
+int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+	struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata;
+	struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent);
+	struct acpi_pci_root *root = acpi_driver_data(adev);
+
+	return root->segment;
+}
+
+int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
+{
+	if (!acpi_disabled) {
+		struct pci_config_window *cfg = bridge->bus->sysdata;
+		struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent);
+		ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, adev);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space
+ * mapping.
+ */
+static int pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
+				       struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri)
+{
+	struct resource *bus_res = &root->secondary;
+	u16 seg = root->segment;
+	struct pci_config_window *cfg;
+	struct resource cfgres;
+	unsigned int bsz;
+	int err;
+
+	err = pci_mcfg_lookup(root);
+	if (err) {
+		pr_err("%04x:%pR MCFG region not found\n", seg, bus_res);
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	bsz = 1 << pci_generic_ecam_ops.bus_shift;
+	cfgres.start = root->mcfg_addr + bus_res->start * bsz;
+	cfgres.end = cfgres.start + resource_size(bus_res) * bsz - 1;
+	cfgres.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
+	cfg = pci_ecam_create(&root->device->dev, &cfgres, bus_res,
+			      &pci_generic_ecam_ops);
+	if (IS_ERR(cfg)) {
+		pr_err("%04x:%pR error %ld mapping CAM\n", seg, bus_res,
+		       PTR_ERR(cfg));
+		return PTR_ERR(cfg);
+	}
+
+	ri->cfg = cfg;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* release_info: free resrouces allocated by init_info */
+static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
+{
+	struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri;
+
+	ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common);
+	pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg);
+	kfree(ri);
+}
+
+static struct acpi_pci_root_ops acpi_pci_root_ops = {
+	.release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info,
+};
+
+/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */
 struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
 {
-	/* TODO: Should be revisited when implementing PCI on ACPI */
-	return NULL;
+	int node = acpi_get_node(root->device->handle);
+	struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri;
+	struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
+	int err;
+
+	ri = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL, node);
+	if (!ri)
+		return NULL;
+
+	err = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root, ri);
+	if (err)
+		return NULL;
+
+	acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops;
+	bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, &ri->common,
+				   ri->cfg);
+	if (!bus)
+		return NULL;
+
+	pci_bus_size_bridges(bus);
+	pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
+		pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
+
+	return bus;
 }
 
 void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index 9661c85..f66d188 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -1390,7 +1390,12 @@  static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
 {
 	return bus->domain_nr;
 }
+/* Arch specific ACPI hook to set-up domain number */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus);
+#else
 static inline int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return -1; }
+#endif
 void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent);
 #else
 static inline void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus,