| Message ID | 577E291002000078000FBF18@prv-mh.provo.novell.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:04:00AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > Only a positive return value indicates success. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> /Jarkko > --- > drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- 4.7-rc6-xenbus_scanf.orig/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c > +++ 4.7-rc6-xenbus_scanf/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c > @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static void backend_changed(struct xenbu > break; > > if (xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, > - "feature-protocol-v2", "%d", &val) < 0) > + "feature-protocol-v2", "%d", &val) <= 0) > val = 0; > if (!val) { > xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, -EINVAL, > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:35:54PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:04:00AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > Only a positive return value indicates success. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Applied. Should this be CC'd to stable or not? /Jarkko > /Jarkko > > > --- > > drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > --- 4.7-rc6-xenbus_scanf.orig/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c > > +++ 4.7-rc6-xenbus_scanf/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c > > @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static void backend_changed(struct xenbu > > break; > > > > if (xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, > > - "feature-protocol-v2", "%d", &val) < 0) > > + "feature-protocol-v2", "%d", &val) <= 0) > > val = 0; > > if (!val) { > > xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, -EINVAL, > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape
>>> On 07.07.16 at 12:38, <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:35:54PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:04:00AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > Only a positive return value indicates success. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> >> >> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> > > Applied. Should this be CC'd to stable or not? Actually the Xen code maintainers dislike this kind of change (expressed in reply to a change elsewhere in the tree), so maybe you want to sync with them whether to pull it back out. In any event I don't think it needs Cc-ing to stable@. Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:00:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 07.07.16 at 12:38, <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:35:54PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:04:00AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> > Only a positive return value indicates success. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> > > > > Applied. Should this be CC'd to stable or not? > > Actually the Xen code maintainers dislike this kind of change > (expressed in reply to a change elsewhere in the tree), so > maybe you want to sync with them whether to pull it back out. > In any event I don't think it needs Cc-ing to stable@. OK, it's in my master branch (bleeding edge) so no harm done yet. > Jan /Jarkko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape
--- 4.7-rc6-xenbus_scanf.orig/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c +++ 4.7-rc6-xenbus_scanf/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static void backend_changed(struct xenbu break; if (xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, - "feature-protocol-v2", "%d", &val) < 0) + "feature-protocol-v2", "%d", &val) <= 0) val = 0; if (!val) { xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, -EINVAL,
Only a positive return value indicates success. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape