Message ID | 1468546827-28501-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
At 07/15/2016 09:40 AM, Liu Bo wrote: > I have a valid btrfs image which contains, > ... > item 10 key (1103101952 BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM 1288372224) itemoff 15947 itemsize 24 > block group used 655360 chunk_objectid 256 flags DATA|RAID5 > item 11 key (1103364096 EXTENT_ITEM 131072) itemoff 15894 itemsize 53 > extent refs 1 gen 11 flags DATA > extent data backref root 5 objectid 258 offset 0 count 1 > item 12 key (1103888384 EXTENT_ITEM 262144) itemoff 15841 itemsize 53 > extent refs 1 gen 15 flags DATA > extent data backref root 1 objectid 256 offset 0 count 1 > item 13 key (1104281600 EXTENT_ITEM 262144) itemoff 15788 itemsize 53 > extent refs 1 gen 15 flags DATA > extent data backref root 1 objectid 257 offset 0 count 1 > ... > > The extent [1103364096, 131072) has length 131072, but if we run > > "btrfs-map-logical -l 1103364096 -b $((65536 * 3)) /dev/sda" > > it will return mapping info 's of non-existing extents. > > It's because it assumes that extents's are contiguous on logical address, > when it's not true, after one loop (cur_logical += cur_len) and mapping > the next extent, we can get an extent that is out of our search range and > we end up with a negative @real_len and printing all mapping infos till > the disk end. > > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Yes, the assumption of all extents are contiguous is quite wrong. So your check is needed. Thanks, Qu > --- > btrfs-map-logical.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/btrfs-map-logical.c b/btrfs-map-logical.c > index fd0286d..f421a50 100644 > --- a/btrfs-map-logical.c > +++ b/btrfs-map-logical.c > @@ -329,6 +329,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > goto out_close_fd; > if (ret > 0) > break; > + /* check again if there is overlap. */ > + if (cur_logical + cur_len < logical || > + cur_logical >= logical + bytes) > + break; > + > real_logical = max(logical, cur_logical); > real_len = min(logical + bytes, cur_logical + cur_len) - > real_logical; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:22:52AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > At 07/15/2016 09:40 AM, Liu Bo wrote: > > I have a valid btrfs image which contains, > > ... > > item 10 key (1103101952 BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM 1288372224) itemoff 15947 itemsize 24 > > block group used 655360 chunk_objectid 256 flags DATA|RAID5 > > item 11 key (1103364096 EXTENT_ITEM 131072) itemoff 15894 itemsize 53 > > extent refs 1 gen 11 flags DATA > > extent data backref root 5 objectid 258 offset 0 count 1 > > item 12 key (1103888384 EXTENT_ITEM 262144) itemoff 15841 itemsize 53 > > extent refs 1 gen 15 flags DATA > > extent data backref root 1 objectid 256 offset 0 count 1 > > item 13 key (1104281600 EXTENT_ITEM 262144) itemoff 15788 itemsize 53 > > extent refs 1 gen 15 flags DATA > > extent data backref root 1 objectid 257 offset 0 count 1 > > ... > > > > The extent [1103364096, 131072) has length 131072, but if we run > > > > "btrfs-map-logical -l 1103364096 -b $((65536 * 3)) /dev/sda" > > > > it will return mapping info 's of non-existing extents. > > > > It's because it assumes that extents's are contiguous on logical address, > > when it's not true, after one loop (cur_logical += cur_len) and mapping > > the next extent, we can get an extent that is out of our search range and > > we end up with a negative @real_len and printing all mapping infos till > > the disk end. > > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> > > Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Applied, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/btrfs-map-logical.c b/btrfs-map-logical.c index fd0286d..f421a50 100644 --- a/btrfs-map-logical.c +++ b/btrfs-map-logical.c @@ -329,6 +329,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) goto out_close_fd; if (ret > 0) break; + /* check again if there is overlap. */ + if (cur_logical + cur_len < logical || + cur_logical >= logical + bytes) + break; + real_logical = max(logical, cur_logical); real_len = min(logical + bytes, cur_logical + cur_len) - real_logical;
I have a valid btrfs image which contains, ... item 10 key (1103101952 BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM 1288372224) itemoff 15947 itemsize 24 block group used 655360 chunk_objectid 256 flags DATA|RAID5 item 11 key (1103364096 EXTENT_ITEM 131072) itemoff 15894 itemsize 53 extent refs 1 gen 11 flags DATA extent data backref root 5 objectid 258 offset 0 count 1 item 12 key (1103888384 EXTENT_ITEM 262144) itemoff 15841 itemsize 53 extent refs 1 gen 15 flags DATA extent data backref root 1 objectid 256 offset 0 count 1 item 13 key (1104281600 EXTENT_ITEM 262144) itemoff 15788 itemsize 53 extent refs 1 gen 15 flags DATA extent data backref root 1 objectid 257 offset 0 count 1 ... The extent [1103364096, 131072) has length 131072, but if we run "btrfs-map-logical -l 1103364096 -b $((65536 * 3)) /dev/sda" it will return mapping info 's of non-existing extents. It's because it assumes that extents's are contiguous on logical address, when it's not true, after one loop (cur_logical += cur_len) and mapping the next extent, we can get an extent that is out of our search range and we end up with a negative @real_len and printing all mapping infos till the disk end. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> --- btrfs-map-logical.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)