Message ID | 20160904213152.25837-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
On 09/04, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > USB0_DDR_BRIDGE and USB1_DDR_BRIDGE1 are needed for the related > dwc2 usb controller. USB, USB0 and USB1 are needed for the PHYs. > Expose these clocks to DT and comment out in clk driver. > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Is authorship correct on this patch? Did Jerome author it instead?
On 09/04, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > USB0_DDR_BRIDGE and USB1_DDR_BRIDGE1 are needed for the related > dwc2 usb controller. USB, USB0 and USB1 are needed for the PHYs. > Expose these clocks to DT and comment out in clk driver. > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > --- Assuming authorship is resolved: Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 09/04, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: >> USB0_DDR_BRIDGE and USB1_DDR_BRIDGE1 are needed for the related >> dwc2 usb controller. USB, USB0 and USB1 are needed for the PHYs. >> Expose these clocks to DT and comment out in clk driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > > Is authorship correct on this patch? Did Jerome author it > instead? We (Jerome and I) have both worked on this patch, that's why you have two signed-off-by's. Or is this simply about the order (author = from address should be listed first)? Regards, Martin
On 09/07, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > On 09/04, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > >> USB0_DDR_BRIDGE and USB1_DDR_BRIDGE1 are needed for the related > >> dwc2 usb controller. USB, USB0 and USB1 are needed for the PHYs. > >> Expose these clocks to DT and comment out in clk driver. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > > > > Is authorship correct on this patch? Did Jerome author it > > instead? > We (Jerome and I) have both worked on this patch, that's why you have > two signed-off-by's. > Or is this simply about the order (author = from address should be > listed first)? Yes. Typically author is listed first in the signed-off-by chain.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 09/07, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote: >> > On 09/04, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: >> >> USB0_DDR_BRIDGE and USB1_DDR_BRIDGE1 are needed for the related >> >> dwc2 usb controller. USB, USB0 and USB1 are needed for the PHYs. >> >> Expose these clocks to DT and comment out in clk driver. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> >> > >> > Is authorship correct on this patch? Did Jerome author it >> > instead? >> We (Jerome and I) have both worked on this patch, that's why you have >> two signed-off-by's. >> Or is this simply about the order (author = from address should be >> listed first)? > > Yes. Typically author is listed first in the signed-off-by chain. > And if you use git-format-patch + git-send-email, there would also be a From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> at the beginning so that when it gets applied by the maintainer, authorship is correct. Kevin
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> writes: > On 09/04, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: >> USB0_DDR_BRIDGE and USB1_DDR_BRIDGE1 are needed for the related >> dwc2 usb controller. USB, USB0 and USB1 are needed for the PHYs. >> Expose these clocks to DT and comment out in clk driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> >> --- > > Assuming authorship is resolved: > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> After some clarification from Jerome (Martin is the primary author), I've applied this, with the SoB order swapped. Kevin
diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h index 3606e875..c66df2d 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.h @@ -218,12 +218,12 @@ #define CLKID_AIU 47 #define CLKID_UART1 48 #define CLKID_G2D 49 -#define CLKID_USB0 50 -#define CLKID_USB1 51 +/* CLKID_USB0 */ +/* CLKID_USB1 */ #define CLKID_RESET 52 #define CLKID_NAND 53 #define CLKID_DOS_PARSER 54 -#define CLKID_USB 55 +/* CLKID_USB */ #define CLKID_VDIN1 56 #define CLKID_AHB_ARB0 57 #define CLKID_EFUSE 58 @@ -232,8 +232,8 @@ #define CLKID_AHB_CTRL_BUS 61 #define CLKID_HDMI_INTR_SYNC 62 #define CLKID_HDMI_PCLK 63 -#define CLKID_USB1_DDR_BRIDGE 64 -#define CLKID_USB0_DDR_BRIDGE 65 +/* CLKID_USB1_DDR_BRIDGE */ +/* CLKID_USB0_DDR_BRIDGE */ #define CLKID_MMC_PCLK 66 #define CLKID_DVIN 67 #define CLKID_UART2 68 diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h index 244ea6e..a03463f 100644 --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/gxbb-clkc.h @@ -10,6 +10,11 @@ #define CLKID_CLK81 12 #define CLKID_MPLL2 15 #define CLKID_ETH 36 +#define CLKID_USB0 50 +#define CLKID_USB1 51 +#define CLKID_USB 55 +#define CLKID_USB1_DDR_BRIDGE 64 +#define CLKID_USB0_DDR_BRIDGE 65 #define CLKID_SD_EMMC_A 94 #define CLKID_SD_EMMC_B 95 #define CLKID_SD_EMMC_C 96