diff mbox

[RESEND,v4] thermal: tango: add resume support

Message ID 57CFD031.7020500@sigmadesigns.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Marc Gonzalez Sept. 7, 2016, 8:30 a.m. UTC
When this platform is suspended, firmware powers the entire SoC down,
except a few hardware blocks waiting for wakeup events. There is no
context to save for this particular block.

Therefore, there is nothing useful for the driver to do on suspend;
so we define a NULL suspend hook. On resume, the driver initializes
the block exactly as is done in the probe callback.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com>
---
Add Kevin's Reviewed-by tag.
Earlier versions of this patch were reviewed by Kevin and Thierry.
The current form is preferred by Arnd.
Rui, could you take this patch before the next merge window opens?
---
 drivers/thermal/tango_thermal.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann Sept. 7, 2016, 8:55 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 10:30:41 AM CEST Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> When this platform is suspended, firmware powers the entire SoC down,
> except a few hardware blocks waiting for wakeup events. There is no
> context to save for this particular block.
> 
> Therefore, there is nothing useful for the driver to do on suspend;
> so we define a NULL suspend hook. On resume, the driver initializes
> the block exactly as is done in the probe callback.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com>

Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Marc Gonzalez Sept. 14, 2016, 3:35 p.m. UTC | #2
On 07/09/2016 10:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 10:30:41 AM CEST Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> When this platform is suspended, firmware powers the entire SoC down,
>> except a few hardware blocks waiting for wakeup events. There is no
>> context to save for this particular block.
>>
>> Therefore, there is nothing useful for the driver to do on suspend;
>> so we define a NULL suspend hook. On resume, the driver initializes
>> the block exactly as is done in the probe callback.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Hello Rui, Eduardo,

The present patch has been reviewed by both Kevin Hilman and Arnd Bergmann,
two arm-soc maintainers. Can you pick it up in time for inclusion in v4.9?

Regards.
Zhang Rui Sept. 18, 2016, 1:58 a.m. UTC | #3
On 三, 2016-09-14 at 17:35 +0200, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 07/09/2016 10:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 10:30:41 AM CEST Marc Gonzalez
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > When this platform is suspended, firmware powers the entire SoC
> > > down,
> > > except a few hardware blocks waiting for wakeup events. There is
> > > no
> > > context to save for this particular block.
> > > 
> > > Therefore, there is nothing useful for the driver to do on
> > > suspend;
> > > so we define a NULL suspend hook. On resume, the driver
> > > initializes
> > > the block exactly as is done in the probe callback.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Hello Rui, Eduardo,
> 
> The present patch has been reviewed by both Kevin Hilman and Arnd
> Bergmann,
> two arm-soc maintainers. Can you pick it up in time for inclusion in
> v4.9?

It has already been in thermal -release branch for a while, and queued
for 4.9.

thanks,
rui
> 
> Regards.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Marc Gonzalez Sept. 19, 2016, 1:33 p.m. UTC | #4
On 18/09/2016 03:58, Zhang Rui wrote:

> On 2016-09-14 at 17:35 +0200, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> Hello Rui, Eduardo,
>>
>> The present patch has been reviewed by both Kevin Hilman and Arnd Bergmann,
>> two arm-soc maintainers. Can you pick it up in time for inclusion in v4.9?
> 
> It has already been in thermal -release branch for a while, and queued
> for 4.9.

Sorry, I was expecting an ACK on the list. It never occurred to me
to check your tree. Thanks for taking the patch.

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux.git/commit/?h=release&id=186e2aa3954c3201583e5ec3149faa6caa67d2b9

Regards.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tango_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/tango_thermal.c
index 70e0d9f406e9..201304aeafeb 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/tango_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/tango_thermal.c
@@ -64,6 +64,12 @@  static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops ops = {
 	.get_temp	= tango_get_temp,
 };
 
+static void tango_thermal_init(struct tango_thermal_priv *priv)
+{
+	writel(0, priv->base + TEMPSI_CFG);
+	writel(CMD_ON, priv->base + TEMPSI_CMD);
+}
+
 static int tango_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct resource *res;
@@ -79,14 +85,22 @@  static int tango_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
 		return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
 
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
 	priv->thresh_idx = IDX_MIN;
-	writel(0, priv->base + TEMPSI_CFG);
-	writel(CMD_ON, priv->base + TEMPSI_CMD);
+	tango_thermal_init(priv);
 
 	tzdev = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev, 0, priv, &ops);
 	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(tzdev);
 }
 
+static int __maybe_unused tango_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	tango_thermal_init(dev_get_drvdata(dev));
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tango_thermal_pm, NULL, tango_thermal_resume);
+
 static const struct of_device_id tango_sensor_ids[] = {
 	{
 		.compatible = "sigma,smp8758-thermal",
@@ -99,6 +113,7 @@  static struct platform_driver tango_thermal_driver = {
 	.driver	= {
 		.name		= "tango-thermal",
 		.of_match_table	= tango_sensor_ids,
+		.pm		= &tango_thermal_pm,
 	},
 };