| Message ID | 1308566761-2850-2-git-send-email-tushar.behera@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Rejected |
| Delegated to: | Tomi Valkeinen |
| Headers | show |
> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tushar Behera > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 4:16 PM > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk; tony@atomide.com; > lethal@linux-sh.org; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; > patches@linaro.org; Nilofer, Samreen > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] config: omap2+: force fb and dss support > as built-in > > In certain board files, there are references to vram related functions > which are defined in drivers/video/omap2/vram.c. Because of > this direct > dependency, CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 should be a built-in feature. > > As per the current architecture, CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 is dependent on > CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS. Hence CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS support should also > be selected > by default. > > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> > Cc: Samreen <samreen@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `rx51_video_mem_init': > linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-video.c:97: > undefined reference to `omap_vram_set_sdram_vram' > arch/arm/plat-omap/built-in.o: In function `omap_reserve': > linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c:66: undefined > reference to `omap_vram_reserve_sdram_memblock' > arch/arm/plat-omap/built-in.o: In function `omap_detect_sram': > linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c:179: undefined > reference to `omap_vram_reserve_sram' > make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig > b/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig > index d5f00d7..c3ffff2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig > @@ -138,11 +138,11 @@ CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID=y > CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS=y > CONFIG_FB_TILEBLITTING=y > CONFIG_FB_OMAP_LCD_VGA=y > -CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS=m > +CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS=y > CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_RFBI=y > CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_SDI=y > CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_DSI=y > -CONFIG_FB_OMAP2=m > +CONFIG_FB_OMAP2=y > CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC_DPI=m > CONFIG_PANEL_SHARP_LS037V7DW01=m > CONFIG_PANEL_NEC_NL8048HL11_01B=m [sp] Instead of changing the omap2plus_defconfig, shouldn't the board specific file be fixed instead? ~sanjeev > -- > 1.7.4.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:37:07PM +0530, Premi, Sanjeev wrote: > [sp] Instead of changing the omap2plus_defconfig, shouldn't the > board specific file be fixed instead? The board specific configuration files in the mainline kernel are deprecated and are gradually being removed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> -----Original Message----- > From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux@arm.linux.org.uk] > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 5:51 PM > To: Premi, Sanjeev > Cc: Tushar Behera; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; > tony@atomide.com; lethal@linux-sh.org; > linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; patches@linaro.org; Nilofer, Samreen > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] config: omap2+: force fb and dss > support as built-in > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:37:07PM +0530, Premi, Sanjeev wrote: > > [sp] Instead of changing the omap2plus_defconfig, shouldn't the > > board specific file be fixed instead? > > The board specific configuration files in the mainline kernel are > deprecated and are gradually being removed. > [sp] I didn't mean board specific config file, but: linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-video.c ~sanjeev-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 16:16 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > In certain board files, there are references to vram related functions > which are defined in drivers/video/omap2/vram.c. Because of this direct > dependency, CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 should be a built-in feature. arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/vram.h defines dummy inline function in case vram.c is not compiled in, so the board files should compile fine. > As per the current architecture, CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 is dependent on > CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS. Hence CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS support should also be selected > by default. The configuration is fine as it is. And anyway, if things do not compile when something is configured as a module, the correct fix is hardly just changing the feature to be compiled built-in =). > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> > Cc: Samreen <samreen@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `rx51_video_mem_init': > linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-video.c:97: undefined reference to `omap_vram_set_sdram_vram' > arch/arm/plat-omap/built-in.o: In function `omap_reserve': > linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c:66: undefined reference to `omap_vram_reserve_sdram_memblock' > arch/arm/plat-omap/built-in.o: In function `omap_detect_sram': > linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c:179: undefined reference to `omap_vram_reserve_sram' > make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 Compiles fine for me. Perhaps you are using some old kernel? Tomi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Monday 20 June 2011 06:34 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 16:16 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: >> In certain board files, there are references to vram related functions >> which are defined in drivers/video/omap2/vram.c. Because of this direct >> dependency, CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 should be a built-in feature. > > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/vram.h defines dummy inline function in > case vram.c is not compiled in, so the board files should compile fine. > >> As per the current architecture, CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 is dependent on >> CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS. Hence CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS support should also be selected >> by default. > > The configuration is fine as it is. And anyway, if things do not compile > when something is configured as a module, the correct fix is hardly just > changing the feature to be compiled built-in =). Agreed. :) I am not an expert in DSS. I just wanted to raise my concern. > >> Cc: Tony Lindgren<tony@atomide.com> >> Cc: Samreen<samreen@ti.com> >> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera<tushar.behera@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `rx51_video_mem_init': >> linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-video.c:97: undefined reference to `omap_vram_set_sdram_vram' >> arch/arm/plat-omap/built-in.o: In function `omap_reserve': >> linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c:66: undefined reference to `omap_vram_reserve_sdram_memblock' >> arch/arm/plat-omap/built-in.o: In function `omap_detect_sram': >> linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c:179: undefined reference to `omap_vram_reserve_sram' >> make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 >> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > Compiles fine for me. Perhaps you are using some old kernel? As mentioned in the cover letter, we get this error only if 2/2 is applied and 1/2 is not applied. I tested this by applying 2/2 on v3.0-rc4 and using omap2plus_defconfig. > > Tomi > >
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig index d5f00d7..c3ffff2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig @@ -138,11 +138,11 @@ CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID=y CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS=y CONFIG_FB_TILEBLITTING=y CONFIG_FB_OMAP_LCD_VGA=y -CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS=m +CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS=y CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_RFBI=y CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_SDI=y CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_DSI=y -CONFIG_FB_OMAP2=m +CONFIG_FB_OMAP2=y CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC_DPI=m CONFIG_PANEL_SHARP_LS037V7DW01=m CONFIG_PANEL_NEC_NL8048HL11_01B=m
In certain board files, there are references to vram related functions which are defined in drivers/video/omap2/vram.c. Because of this direct dependency, CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 should be a built-in feature. As per the current architecture, CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 is dependent on CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS. Hence CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS support should also be selected by default. Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Samreen <samreen@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `rx51_video_mem_init': linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-video.c:97: undefined reference to `omap_vram_set_sdram_vram' arch/arm/plat-omap/built-in.o: In function `omap_reserve': linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c:66: undefined reference to `omap_vram_reserve_sdram_memblock' arch/arm/plat-omap/built-in.o: In function `omap_detect_sram': linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c:179: undefined reference to `omap_vram_reserve_sram' make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)