diff mbox

dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix merge conflict

Message ID 20160915155118.3008739-1-arnd@arndb.de (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Arnd Bergmann Sept. 15, 2016, 3:50 p.m. UTC
The sdma_handle_channel_loop() function was modified in one patch
and removed in another, and the merge between those patches left
an unused function in place:

drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:673:13: error: 'sdma_handle_channel_loop' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]

This removes it again.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 48dc77e2d4fc ("dmaengine: imx-sdma: convert callback to helper function")
Fixes: 15f30f513111 ("dmaengine: imx-sdma - reduce transfer latency for DMA cyclic clients")
---
 drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann Sept. 22, 2016, 11:42 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 5:50:49 PM CEST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The sdma_handle_channel_loop() function was modified in one patch
> and removed in another, and the merge between those patches left
> an unused function in place:
> 
> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:673:13: error: 'sdma_handle_channel_loop' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> 
> This removes it again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Fixes: 48dc77e2d4fc ("dmaengine: imx-sdma: convert callback to helper function")
> Fixes: 15f30f513111 ("dmaengine: imx-sdma - reduce transfer latency for DMA cyclic clients")
> ---

Hi Vinod,

I still see the warning in linux-next, can you apply the patch?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Vinod Koul Sept. 23, 2016, 3:45 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 01:42:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, September 15, 2016 5:50:49 PM CEST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The sdma_handle_channel_loop() function was modified in one patch
> > and removed in another, and the merge between those patches left
> > an unused function in place:
> > 
> > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:673:13: error: 'sdma_handle_channel_loop' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> > 
> > This removes it again.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Fixes: 48dc77e2d4fc ("dmaengine: imx-sdma: convert callback to helper function")
> > Fixes: 15f30f513111 ("dmaengine: imx-sdma - reduce transfer latency for DMA cyclic clients")
> > ---
> 
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> I still see the warning in linux-next, can you apply the patch?

Applied, now. Sorry had missed earlier
Arnd Bergmann Oct. 4, 2016, 7:43 a.m. UTC | #3
On Friday, September 23, 2016 9:15:57 AM CEST Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 01:42:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 15, 2016 5:50:49 PM CEST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > The sdma_handle_channel_loop() function was modified in one patch
> > > and removed in another, and the merge between those patches left
> > > an unused function in place:
> > > 
> > > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:673:13: error: 'sdma_handle_channel_loop' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> > > 
> > > This removes it again.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > Fixes: 48dc77e2d4fc ("dmaengine: imx-sdma: convert callback to helper function")
> > > Fixes: 15f30f513111 ("dmaengine: imx-sdma - reduce transfer latency for DMA cyclic clients")
> > > ---
> > 
> > Hi Vinod,
> > 
> > I still see the warning in linux-next, can you apply the patch?
> 
> Applied, now. Sorry had missed earlier

The problem was fixed after you applied the patch, but it seems the
same one is now back in linux-next.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Vinod Koul Oct. 4, 2016, 8:02 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:43:16AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday, September 23, 2016 9:15:57 AM CEST Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 01:42:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Thursday, September 15, 2016 5:50:49 PM CEST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > The sdma_handle_channel_loop() function was modified in one patch
> > > > and removed in another, and the merge between those patches left
> > > > an unused function in place:
> > > > 
> > > > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:673:13: error: 'sdma_handle_channel_loop' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> > > > 
> > > > This removes it again.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > > Fixes: 48dc77e2d4fc ("dmaengine: imx-sdma: convert callback to helper function")
> > > > Fixes: 15f30f513111 ("dmaengine: imx-sdma - reduce transfer latency for DMA cyclic clients")
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > Hi Vinod,
> > > 
> > > I still see the warning in linux-next, can you apply the patch?
> > 
> > Applied, now. Sorry had missed earlier
> 
> The problem was fixed after you applied the patch, but it seems the
> same one is now back in linux-next.

Opps I am sorry for that.

To prepare for pull request I rebased my next, and I fixed it while merging
with tty. I was planning to send this to Linus as reference.

But then i had to redo this as I merged some other code not going
for 4.9 and messed up in second try.

Thanks for pointing it out. It is fixed now and pushed
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
index 695f1603a224..7fb55ddf637b 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
@@ -670,11 +670,6 @@  static void sdma_event_disable(struct sdma_channel *sdmac, unsigned int event)
 	writel_relaxed(val, sdma->regs + chnenbl);
 }
 
-static void sdma_handle_channel_loop(struct sdma_channel *sdmac)
-{
-	dmaengine_desc_get_callback_invoke(&sdmac->desc, NULL);
-}
-
 static void sdma_update_channel_loop(struct sdma_channel *sdmac)
 {
 	struct sdma_buffer_descriptor *bd;