Message ID | 20161117175752.16475-5-andre.przywara@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:57:52PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote: > Add a simple test for the GICv3 TYPER test, which does only one basic > check to ensure we have actually enough interrupt IDs if we support > LPIs. > Allow a GICv3 guest to do the common MMIO checks as well, where the > register semantics are shared with a GICv2. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> > --- > arm/gic.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > arm/unittests.cfg | 6 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c > index 02b1be1..7de0e47 100644 > --- a/arm/gic.c > +++ b/arm/gic.c > @@ -327,6 +327,30 @@ static bool test_typer_v2(uint32_t reg) > return true; > } > > +static bool test_typer_v3(uint32_t reg) > +{ > + int nr_intids; > + > + report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s MBIs", 1, > + reg & BIT(16) ? "" : "does not ", > + reg & BIT(16) ? "s" : ""); Could just do the test once ("...%s...", reg & BIT(16) ? "supports" : "does not support" > + report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s LPIs", 1, > + reg & BIT(17) ? "" : "does not ", > + reg & BIT(17) ? "s" : ""); > + report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s Aff3", 1, > + reg & BIT(24) ? "" : "does not ", > + reg & BIT(24) ? "s" : ""); > + > + nr_intids = BIT(((reg >> 19) & 0x1f) + 1); > + report("%d interrupt IDs implemented", 1, nr_intids); > + > + if (reg & BIT(17)) > + report("%d LPIs supported", nr_intids > 8192, > + nr_intids > 8192 ? nr_intids - 8192 : 0); I'm wondering if we should try to keep the number of report lines the same host to host. So anywhere we can't do a PASS/FAIL test we should do a SKIP. Doing that will allow us to cleanly diff test results between hosts. (I'm not sure I've been doing a good job of that with the existing tests though...) > + > + return true; No need to return a value. > +} > + > #define BYTE(reg32, byte) (((reg32) >> ((byte) * 8)) & 0xff) > #define REPLACE_BYTE(reg32, byte, new) (((reg32) & ~(0xff << ((byte) * 8))) |\ > ((new) << ((byte) * 8))) > @@ -460,8 +484,9 @@ static int gic_test_mmio(int gic_version) > idreg = gic_dist_base + 0xfe8; > break; > case 0x3: > - report_abort("GICv3 MMIO tests NYI"); > - return -1; > + gic_dist_base = gicv3_dist_base(); > + idreg = gic_dist_base + 0xffe8; No define for this ID reg? > + break; > default: > report_abort("GIC version %d not supported", gic_version); > return 0; > @@ -471,7 +496,10 @@ static int gic_test_mmio(int gic_version) > nr_irqs = 32 * ((reg & 0x1f) + 1); > report("number of implemented SPIs: %d", 1, nr_irqs - 32); > > - test_typer_v2(reg); > + if (gic_version == 2) > + test_typer_v2(reg); > + else > + test_typer_v3(reg); Maybe we should use a switch here too, preparing for v4 > > report("IIDR: 0x%x", 1, readl(gic_dist_base + GICD_IIDR)); > > diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg > index 0162e5a..b432346 100644 > --- a/arm/unittests.cfg > +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg > @@ -78,3 +78,9 @@ file = gic.flat > smp = $MAX_SMP > extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'ipi' > groups = gic > + > +[gicv3-mmio] > +file = gic.flat > +smp = $MAX_SMP > +extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'mmio' > +groups = gic > -- > 2.9.0 > > Thanks, drew
Hi, On 18/11/2016 15:41, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:57:52PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote: >> Add a simple test for the GICv3 TYPER test, which does only one basic >> check to ensure we have actually enough interrupt IDs if we support >> LPIs. >> Allow a GICv3 guest to do the common MMIO checks as well, where the >> register semantics are shared with a GICv2. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> >> --- >> arm/gic.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> arm/unittests.cfg | 6 ++++++ >> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c nit: in the top comments you could add "GICv3 MMIO test" for homogeneity >> index 02b1be1..7de0e47 100644 >> --- a/arm/gic.c >> +++ b/arm/gic.c >> @@ -327,6 +327,30 @@ static bool test_typer_v2(uint32_t reg) >> return true; >> } >> >> +static bool test_typer_v3(uint32_t reg) >> +{ >> + int nr_intids; >> + >> + report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s MBIs", 1, >> + reg & BIT(16) ? "" : "does not ", >> + reg & BIT(16) ? "s" : ""); > > Could just do the test once > > ("...%s...", reg & BIT(16) ? "supports" : "does not support" > >> + report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s LPIs", 1, >> + reg & BIT(17) ? "" : "does not ", >> + reg & BIT(17) ? "s" : ""); >> + report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s Aff3", 1, >> + reg & BIT(24) ? "" : "does not ", >> + reg & BIT(24) ? "s" : ""); >> + >> + nr_intids = BIT(((reg >> 19) & 0x1f) + 1); >> + report("%d interrupt IDs implemented", 1, nr_intids); >> + >> + if (reg & BIT(17)) >> + report("%d LPIs supported", nr_intids > 8192, Maybe I misunderstand the spec but LPIs start at 8192 (>=) and also the spec says that "In an implementation that includes LPIs, at least 8192 LPIs are supported (>= 2x 8192)" Thanks Eric >> + nr_intids > 8192 ? nr_intids - 8192 : 0); > > I'm wondering if we should try to keep the number of report lines > the same host to host. So anywhere we can't do a PASS/FAIL test we > should do a SKIP. Doing that will allow us to cleanly diff test > results between hosts. (I'm not sure I've been doing a good job of > that with the existing tests though...) > >> + >> + return true; > > No need to return a value. > >> +} >> + >> #define BYTE(reg32, byte) (((reg32) >> ((byte) * 8)) & 0xff) >> #define REPLACE_BYTE(reg32, byte, new) (((reg32) & ~(0xff << ((byte) * 8))) |\ >> ((new) << ((byte) * 8))) >> @@ -460,8 +484,9 @@ static int gic_test_mmio(int gic_version) >> idreg = gic_dist_base + 0xfe8; >> break; >> case 0x3: >> - report_abort("GICv3 MMIO tests NYI"); >> - return -1; >> + gic_dist_base = gicv3_dist_base(); >> + idreg = gic_dist_base + 0xffe8; > > No define for this ID reg? > >> + break; >> default: >> report_abort("GIC version %d not supported", gic_version); >> return 0; >> @@ -471,7 +496,10 @@ static int gic_test_mmio(int gic_version) >> nr_irqs = 32 * ((reg & 0x1f) + 1); >> report("number of implemented SPIs: %d", 1, nr_irqs - 32); >> >> - test_typer_v2(reg); >> + if (gic_version == 2) >> + test_typer_v2(reg); >> + else >> + test_typer_v3(reg); > > Maybe we should use a switch here too, preparing for v4 > >> >> report("IIDR: 0x%x", 1, readl(gic_dist_base + GICD_IIDR)); >> >> diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg >> index 0162e5a..b432346 100644 >> --- a/arm/unittests.cfg >> +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg >> @@ -78,3 +78,9 @@ file = gic.flat >> smp = $MAX_SMP >> extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'ipi' >> groups = gic >> + >> +[gicv3-mmio] >> +file = gic.flat >> +smp = $MAX_SMP >> +extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'mmio' >> +groups = gic >> -- >> 2.9.0 >> >> > > Thanks, > drew >
diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c index 02b1be1..7de0e47 100644 --- a/arm/gic.c +++ b/arm/gic.c @@ -327,6 +327,30 @@ static bool test_typer_v2(uint32_t reg) return true; } +static bool test_typer_v3(uint32_t reg) +{ + int nr_intids; + + report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s MBIs", 1, + reg & BIT(16) ? "" : "does not ", + reg & BIT(16) ? "s" : ""); + report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s LPIs", 1, + reg & BIT(17) ? "" : "does not ", + reg & BIT(17) ? "s" : ""); + report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s Aff3", 1, + reg & BIT(24) ? "" : "does not ", + reg & BIT(24) ? "s" : ""); + + nr_intids = BIT(((reg >> 19) & 0x1f) + 1); + report("%d interrupt IDs implemented", 1, nr_intids); + + if (reg & BIT(17)) + report("%d LPIs supported", nr_intids > 8192, + nr_intids > 8192 ? nr_intids - 8192 : 0); + + return true; +} + #define BYTE(reg32, byte) (((reg32) >> ((byte) * 8)) & 0xff) #define REPLACE_BYTE(reg32, byte, new) (((reg32) & ~(0xff << ((byte) * 8))) |\ ((new) << ((byte) * 8))) @@ -460,8 +484,9 @@ static int gic_test_mmio(int gic_version) idreg = gic_dist_base + 0xfe8; break; case 0x3: - report_abort("GICv3 MMIO tests NYI"); - return -1; + gic_dist_base = gicv3_dist_base(); + idreg = gic_dist_base + 0xffe8; + break; default: report_abort("GIC version %d not supported", gic_version); return 0; @@ -471,7 +496,10 @@ static int gic_test_mmio(int gic_version) nr_irqs = 32 * ((reg & 0x1f) + 1); report("number of implemented SPIs: %d", 1, nr_irqs - 32); - test_typer_v2(reg); + if (gic_version == 2) + test_typer_v2(reg); + else + test_typer_v3(reg); report("IIDR: 0x%x", 1, readl(gic_dist_base + GICD_IIDR)); diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg index 0162e5a..b432346 100644 --- a/arm/unittests.cfg +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg @@ -78,3 +78,9 @@ file = gic.flat smp = $MAX_SMP extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'ipi' groups = gic + +[gicv3-mmio] +file = gic.flat +smp = $MAX_SMP +extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'mmio' +groups = gic
Add a simple test for the GICv3 TYPER test, which does only one basic check to ensure we have actually enough interrupt IDs if we support LPIs. Allow a GICv3 guest to do the common MMIO checks as well, where the register semantics are shared with a GICv2. Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> --- arm/gic.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- arm/unittests.cfg | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)