Message ID | 20170102152621.26639-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 05:26:21PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > LPE Audio driver should take care of DMA IPs by itself. Keeping an ID like this > in dw_dma_pci.c is anyway wrong since that block has two DMA controllers under > one ID (like MFD device). > > That's also why I didn't include LPE Audio ID for Intel Merrifield previously. Applied now
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw/pci.c b/drivers/dma/dw/pci.c index d07e65c48208..7778ed705a1a 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dw/pci.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dw/pci.c @@ -108,9 +108,8 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops dw_pci_dev_pm_ops = { }; static const struct pci_device_id dw_pci_id_table[] = { - /* Medfield */ + /* Medfield (GPDMA) */ { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x0827) }, - { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x0830) }, /* BayTrail */ { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x0f06) },
LPE Audio driver should take care of DMA IPs by itself. Keeping an ID like this in dw_dma_pci.c is anyway wrong since that block has two DMA controllers under one ID (like MFD device). That's also why I didn't include LPE Audio ID for Intel Merrifield previously. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/dma/dw/pci.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)